Cited by 105Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Elevated Zero-maze: A paradigm to evaluate anti-anxiety effects of drugs

Singh, K., Bishnoi, M., Kulkarni, S.K.·2007·Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Elevated zero maze is a modification of the elevated plus maze model of anxiety in rodents. The novel design comprises an elevated annular platform with two opposite, enclosed quadrants and two open quadrants, removing any ambiguity in the interpretation of the time spent in the central square of the traditional design and allowing uninterrupted exploration. In the present study, we validated elevated zero maze as a tool to study antianxiety activity, using various standard anxiolytics belonging to different pharmacological groups, such as benzodiazepines, barbiturates, alcohol etc., and compared the results with elevated plus maze. Bidirectional sensitivity of the model was also assessed using picrotoxin, pentylenetetrazol and flumazenil, the modulators of GABA(A) and benzodiazepine modulators. Animals were administered different standard antianxiety and anxiogenic drugs, and were allowed to explore the elevated zero maze (time spent in open arm, latency to enter in open arm, total number of entries in open arm and number of stretch attend postures [SAPs]) and elevated plus maze (time spent in open arm, latency to enter in open arm, total number of entries in open arm, first preference of the animal [open/closed] and number of stretchings). Selected drugs and doses were then assessed on the mirror chamber paradigm. Results of the present study indicated that elevated zero maze offered a better animal model to study antianxiety activity, when compared with elevated plus maze and mirror chamber.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1358/mf.2007.29.5.1117557

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The elevated-zero maze is considered less ambiguous for anxiolytic testing than the elevated-plus maze or mirror chamber.

    “The elevated-zero maze is a modification of the elevated-plus maze model of anxiety in rodents and has been found to be a less ambiguous model to study anxiolytic activity compared with elevated-plus maze and mirror chamber (Kulkarni et al., 2007).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, K., Bishnoi, M., & Kulkarni, S. K.
Affiliations
Panjab University (IN)
Venue
Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Portico
Published
2007
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
343
ISSN
  • 0379-0355 (ISSN-L)
  • 2013-0155
OpenAlex
W2018820468
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
elevated zero maze, anxiety, antianxiety drugs, elevated plus maze, anxiolytics, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, alcohol, GABAA receptor, picrotoxin, pentylenetetrazole, flumazenil, model validation
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Disease Models, Animal, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review