The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fractures Attributable to Osteoporosis: Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation
Abstract
To assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent osteoporosis, it is necessary to estimate total health care expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures. Resources utilized for the treatment of many diseases can be estimated from secondary databases using relevant diagnosis codes, but such codes do not indicate which fractures are osteoporotic in nature. Therefore, a panel of experts was convened to make judgments about the probabilities that fractures of different types might be related to osteoporosis according to patient age, gender, and race. A three-round Delphi process was applied to estimate the proportion of fractures related to osteoporosis (i.e., the osteoporosis attribution probabilities) in 72 categories comprised of four specific fracture types (hip, spine, forearm, all other sites combined) stratified by three age groups (45–64 years, 65–84 years, 85 years and older), three racial groups (white, black, all others), and both genders (female, male). It was estimated that at least 90% of all hip and spine fractures among elderly white women should be attributed to osteoporosis. Much smaller proportions of the other fractures were attributed to osteoporosis. Regardless of fracture type, attribution probabilities were less for men than women and generally less for non-whites than whites. These probabilities will be used to estimate the total direct medical costs associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 · Cited by 2,446
Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use
Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M., & Brook, R. H. (1984) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.74.9.979 · Cited by 2,089
Cited by
Bazedoxifene for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis
Gennari, L. (2008) · Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management · doi:10.2147/tcrm.s3476 · Cited by 39
Femoral Strength Changes Faster With Age Than BMD in Both Women and Men: A Biomechanical Study
Rezaei, A., & Dragomir-Daescu, D. (2015) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.2572 · Cited by 36
Breuil, V., Cortet, B., Cotté, F.-E., Arnould, B., Dias-Barbosa, C., Gaudin, A.-F., Regnault, A., Roborel de Climens, A., & Legrand, E. (2012) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1555-8 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Melton, L. J., Thamer, M., Ray, N. F., Chan, J. K., Chesnut, C. H., Einhorn, T. A., Johnston, C. C., Raisz, L. G., Silverman, S. L., & Siris, E. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-23
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2031400196
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.