The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-Term Effects of Calcium Supplementation on Serum Parathyroid Hormone Level, Bone Turnover, and Bone Loss in Elderly Women
Abstract
We report a 4-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 236 normal postmenopausal women (mean age ± SE, 66.3 ± 0.2 years) who were randomized to a calcium (1600 mg/day as the citrate) or placebo group. The women were seen every 6 months; 177 completed the trial. Net percentage changes in each group are given relative to baseline. The differences in net percentage changes (calcium group minus placebo group) in medians were: for lumbar spine bone density, 2.0% (p < 0.001) at year 1 and 0.3% (not significant) at year 4; for proximal femur bone density, 1.3% (p = 0.003) at year 1 and 1.3% (p = 0.015) at year 4; and for total body bone mineral, 0.4% (p = 0.002) at year 1 and 0.9% (p = 0.017) at year 4. Similar differences at year 4 were: −18.9% (p = 0.002) for parathyroid hormone (PTH), −11.9% (p = 0.026) for serum osteocalcin, and −32.2% (p = 0.003) for urine free pyridinoline. We conclude that long-term administration of calcium supplements to elderly women partially reverses age-related increases in serum PTH level and bone resorption and decreases bone loss. However, the effects on bone loss were weaker than those reported for estrogen, bisphosphonates, or calcitonin therapy, indicating that calcium supplements alone cannot substitute for these in treating established osteoporosis. Nonetheless, because of their safety, high tolerance, and low expense, calcium supplements may be a useful preventive measure for elderly postmenopausal women whose bone mineral density values are normal for their age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project
Melton, L. J. (1996) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/71.3.266 · Cited by 1,443
Self-citationGALLAGHER, J. C., RIGGS, B. L., & DELUCA, H. F. (1980) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-51-6-1359 · Cited by 428 · cited 1×
“The findings that estrogen replacement in postmenopausal women increases calcium absorption((39,40)) and enhances renal calcium conservation((5,6)) may explain why only estrogen can decrease bone loss during the rapid, early postmenopausal phase whereas either estrogen replacement or large doses of calcium supplements…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Tang, B. M., Eslick, G. D., Nowson, C., Smith, C., & Bensoussan, A. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61342-7 · Cited by 1,248
Bolland, M. J., Avenell, A., Baron, J. A., Grey, A., MacLennan, G. S., Gamble, G. D., & Reid, I. R. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c3691 · Cited by 1,099
Bolland, M. J., Grey, A., Avenell, A., Gamble, G. D., & Reid, I. R. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d2040 · Cited by 851
Qaseem, A., Forciea, M. A., McLean, R. M., Denberg, T. D., & for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians* (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-1361 · Cited by 676
Endocrine Regulation of Male Fertility by the Skeleton
Oury, F., Sumara, G., Sumara, O., Ferron, M., Chang, H., Smith, C. E., Hermo, L., Suarez, S., Roth, B. L., Ducy, P., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.004 · Cited by 628
Metadata
- Authors
- Riggs, B. L., O'Fallon, W. M., Muhs, J., O'Connor, M. K., Kumar, R., & Melton, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-174
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1972391190
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.