The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Perimenopausal Bone Loss: A Prospective Study
Open accessAbstract
This study characterized the change in bone mass, bone markers, pituitary/gonadal hormones, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and anthropometric variables in a cohort of healthy women as they passed through normal menopause. We recruited 75 women > 46 years old who had premenopausal estradiol (E2) and gonadotropin levels and regular menses. During 9.5 years of observation, 54 experienced normal menopause (PM group) and 21 remained estrogen replete (ER group). Before the beginning of the menopausal drop and after its completion, the slope of bone mass on time in the PM group was 0% for the spine, −0.61% per year for the total body, and −0.45% per year for the femoral neck. Designating these losses as “age related,” there were 0, 4.88, and 3.40% losses for spine, total body bone mineral (TBBM), and femoral neck, respectively, in the 8-year period for which the data were analyzed. Across menopause, we found a sigmoid pattern of bone loss in the PM group beginning about 2–3 years before the last menses and ending about 3–4 years after the last menses. The total estrogen-deprivation bone losses were 10.50, 7.73, and 5.30% for the spine, TBBM, and femoral neck, respectively. In the ER group, we found a 0, 0.59, and 0.93% per year loss in spine, TBBM, and femoral neck, respectively. Serum osteocalcin rose 77%, serum total alkaline phosphatase rose 34%, and urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine (Hypro/Cr) ratio rose 44% in the PM group, while remaining stable in the ER group. We conclude that menopausal bone loss is a composite of loss caused by estrogen deprivation and age per se for the hip and total body, but is caused by estrogen deprivation alone for the spine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of menopause on longitudinal bone loss from the spine
Pouilles, J. M., Tremollieres, F., & Ribot, C. (1993) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf00310195 · Cited by 149
Cited by
Sex Steroids and the Construction and Conservation of the Adult Skeleton
Riggs, B. L., Khosla, S., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.23.3.0465 · Cited by 1,846
Estrogens and androgens in skeletal physiology and pathophysiology
Almeida, M., Laurent, M. R., Dubois, V., Claessens, F., O'Brien, C. A., Bouillon, R., Vanderschueren, D., & Manolagas, S. C. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2015 · Cited by 860
Hernandez, C. J., Beaupr�, G. S., & Carter, D. R. (2003) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1454-8 · Cited by 570
Changes in body composition and weight during the menopause transition
Greendale, G. A., Sternfeld, B., Huang, M., Han, W., Karvonen-Gutierrez, C., Ruppert, K., Cauley, J. A., Finkelstein, J. S., Jiang, S.-F., & Karlamangla, A. S. (2019) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.124865 · Cited by 491
Pathophysiology of Osteoporosis
Armas, L. A. G., & Recker, R. R. (2012) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2012.04.006 · Cited by 466
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Recker, R., Lappe, J., Davies, K., & Heaney, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1965-1973
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2061644594
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.