The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence of Vertebral Fracture in Europe: Results From the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS)
Open accessAbstract
Vertebral fracture is one of the major adverse clinical consequences of osteoporosis; however, there are few data concerning the incidence of vertebral fracture in population samples of men and women. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of vertebral fracture in European men and women. A total of 14,011 men and women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population-based registers in 29 European centers and had an interviewer-administered questionnaire and lateral spinal radiographs performed. The response rate for participation in the study was approximately 50%. Repeat spinal radiographs were performed a mean of 3.8 years following the baseline film. All films were evaluated morphometrically. The definition of a morphometric fracture was a vertebra in which there was evidence of a 20% (+4 mm) or more reduction in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral height between films—plus the additional requirement that a vertebra satisfy criteria for a prevalent deformity (using the McCloskey-Kanis method) in the follow-up film. There were 3174 men, mean age 63.1 years, and 3614 women, mean age 62.2 years, with paired duplicate spinal radiographs (48% of those originally recruited to the baseline survey). The age standardized incidence of morphometric fracture was 10.7/1000 person years (pyr) in women and 5.7/1000 pyr in men. The age-standardized incidence of vertebral fracture as assessed qualitatively by the radiologist was broadly similar—12.1/1000 pyr and 6.8/1000 pyr, respectively. The incidence increased markedly with age in both men and women. There was some evidence of geographic variation in fracture occurrence; rates were higher in Sweden than elsewhere in Europe. This is the first large population-based study to ascertain the incidence of vertebral fracture in men and women over 50 years of age across Europe. The data confirm the frequent occurrence of the disorder in men as well as in women and the rise in incidence with age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pre-Existing Fractures and Bone Mass Predict Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Women
Ross, P. D., Davis, J. W., Epstein, R. S., & Wasnich, R. D. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-11-919 · Cited by 1,107
Cited by
Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures
Cummings, S. R., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9 · Cited by 3,821
Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: A meta-analysis
De Laet, C., Kanis, J. A., Odén, A., Johanson, H., Johnell, O., Delmas, P., Eisman, J. A., Kroger, H., Fujiwara, S., Garnero, P., et al. (2005) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-005-1863-y · Cited by 1,622
The Decline of Androgen Levels in Elderly Men and Its Clinical and Therapeutic Implications
Kaufman, J. M., & Vermeulen, A. (2005) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2004-0013 · Cited by 1,079
Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis
Kanis, J. A., Johnell, O., Oden, A., Johansson, H., De Laet, C., Eisman, J. A., Fujiwara, S., Kroger, H., McCloskey, E. V., Mellstrom, D., et al. (2005) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-004-1640-3 · Cited by 999
A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk.
Kanis, J. A., Johansson, H., Oden, A., Johnell, O., de Laet, C., Melton, L. J., Tenenhouse, A., Reeve, J., Silman, A. J., Pols, H. A., et al. (2004) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.040134 · Cited by 839
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Neill, D. D. A. M. G. A. J. W. D. L. A. A. J. C. J. R. B. W. S. K. I. J. O. J. G. V. A. R. G. P. C. T. G. H. G. H. D. W. N. J. C. K. A. O. J. T. W. F. S. L. A. I. F. C. B. B. B. B. C. C. D. E. F. G. H. H. J. J. J. K. K. L. L. L. M. M. M. P. P. P. R. R. R. S. S. T. W. W. Y. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 716-724
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2172539773
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.