Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low‐Magnitude Mechanical Loading Becomes Osteogenic When Rest Is Inserted Between Each Load Cycle

Open access
Srinivasan, Sundar, Weimer, David A., Agans, Steven C., Bain, Steven D., Gross, Ted S.·2002·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Strategies to counteract bone loss with exercise have had fairly limited success, particularly those regimens subjecting the skeleton to mild activity such as walking. In contrast, here we show that it is possible to induce substantial bone formation with low‐magnitude loading. In two distinct in vivo models of bone adaptation, we found that insertion of a 10‐s rest interval between each load cycle transformed a locomotion‐like loading regime that minimally influenced osteoblast activity into a potent anabolic stimulus. In the avian ulna model, the minimal mean (+SE) periosteal labeled surface (Ps.LS) observed in the intact contralateral bones (1.6 ± 1.5%) was doubled after 3 consecutive days of low‐magnitude loading (3.8 ± 1.5%; p = 0.03). However, modifying the regimen by inserting 10 s of rest between each load cycle significantly enhanced the periosteal response (21.9 + 4.5%; p = 0.03). In the murine tibia model, 5 consecutive days of 100 low‐magnitude loading cycles did not significantly alter mean periosteal bone formation rate (BFR) compared with contralateral bones (0.011 ± 0.005 μm 3/μm 2 per day vs. 0.021 ± 0.013 μm 3/μm 2 per day). In contrast, separating each of 10 of the same loading cycles with 10 s of rest significantly elevated periosteal BFR (0.167 ± 0.049 μm 3/μm 2 per day; p = 0.01). Endocortical bone formation parameters were not altered by any loading regimen in either model. We conclude that 10 s of rest between each load cycle of a low‐magnitude loading protocol greatly enhances the osteogenic potential of the regimen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.9.1613

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Srinivasan, S., Weimer, D. A., Agans, S. C., Bain, S. D., & Gross, T. S.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2002-09
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1613-1620
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2036338634
Cited by
299
References
1
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.