The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long-Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures
Abstract
In a large cohort of U.S. women aged 65 and older, we report the relationships of BMD measured at several sites, and subsequent fracture risk at multiple sites over >8 years of follow-up. Although we found almost all fracture types to be related to low BMD, the overall proportion of fractures attributable to low BMD is modest. Introduction: Although several studies have reported the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and subsequent fracture risk, most have been limited by short follow-up time, BMD measures at only one or two sites, or availability of data for only select fracture types. Materials and Methods: In the multicenter Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF), we studied the relationship of several different BMD measures to fracture risk of multiple types in 9704 non-black women aged 65 and older. We previously reported on the relationship of peripheral BMD measures to risk of several types of fracture during an average 2.2-year follow-up period. In this expanded analysis, we present results of the relationship of both peripheral and central BMD measures and fractures of multiple types during 10.4 and 8.5 years of follow-up, respectively. We also report population attributable risk (PAR) estimates for osteoporosis and risk of several types of fracture. Results: Our results show that almost all types of fractures have an increased incidence in women with low BMD. However, hip BMD is somewhat more strongly related to most of the fracture types studied than spine or peripheral BMD measures. Nonetheless, the proportion of fractures attributable to osteoporosis (based on a standard definition of osteoporosis) is modest, ranging from <10% to 44% based on the most commonly used definition of osteoporosis (BMD T-score < −2.5). Conclusion: Finding effective prevention strategies for fractures in older women will require additional interventions beside preventions for bone loss, such as prevention of falls and other fracture risk factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Self-citationBone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 · Cited by 2,446
Self-citationHe, J., Ogden, L. G., Bazzano, L. A., Vupputuri, S., Loria, C., & Whelton, P. K. (2001) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.161.7.996 · Cited by 1,172 · cited 1×
“However, these PAR estimates are comparable with or higher than PAR estimates in the 10–35% range reported for cardiovascular disease based on commonly recognized risk factors such as hypertension,((26,27)) high cholesterol levels,((28)) and lipid profiles.”
Background
Cited by
Denosumab for Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
Cummings, S. R., Martin, J. S., McClung, M. R., Siris, E. S., Eastell, R., Reid, I. R., Delmas, P., Zoog, H. B., Austin, M., Wang, A., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0809493 · Cited by 3,489
Self-citationCompston, J. E., McClung, M. R., & Leslie, W. D. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32112-3 · Cited by 2,449
Camacho, P. M., Petak, S. M., Binkley, N., Diab, D. L., Eldeiry, L. S., Farooki, A., Harris, S. T., Hurley, D. L., Kelly, J., Lewiecki, E. M., et al. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/gl-2020-0524suppl · Cited by 1,182
Camacho, P. M., Petak, S. M., Binkley, N., Clarke, B. L., Harris, S. T., Hurley, D. L., Kleerekoper, M., Lewiecki, E. M., Miller, P. D., Narula, H. S., et al. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161435.esgl · Cited by 1,140
Denosumab in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
Smith, M. R., Egerdie, B., Toriz, N. H., Feldman, R., Tammela, T. L. J., Saad, F., Heracek, J., Szwedowski, M., Ke, C., Kupic, A., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0809003 · Cited by 1,140
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, K. L., Seeley, D. G., Lui, L.-Y., Cauley, J. A., Ensrud, K., Browner, W. S., Nevitt, M. C., & Cummings, S. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1947-1954
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2161555525
- Cited by
- 1,051
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long-Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947
- The paper
- Stone, K. L., Seeley, D. G., Lui, L.-Y., Cauley, J. A., Ensrud, K., Browner, W. S., Nevitt, M. C., & Cummings, S. R. (2003). BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long-Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
