Cited by 1,140Bone health and treatmentsBone health and osteoporosis researchProstate Cancer Treatment and Research

Denosumab in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Open access
Smith, Matthew R., Egerdie, Blair, Toriz, Narciso Hernández, Feldman, Robert, Tammela, Teuvo L.J., Saad, Fred, Heracek, Jiri, Szwedowski, Maciej +4 more·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Androgen-deprivation therapy is well-established for treating prostate cancer but is associated with bone loss and an increased risk of fracture. We investigated the effects of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, on bone mineral density and fractures in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: In this double-blind, multicenter study, we randomly assigned patients to receive denosumab at a dose of 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months or placebo (734 patients in each group). The primary end point was percent change in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine at 24 months. Key secondary end points included percent change in bone mineral densities at the femoral neck and total hip at 24 months and at all three sites at 36 months, as well as incidence of new vertebral fractures. RESULTS: At 24 months, bone mineral density of the lumbar spine had increased by 5.6% in the denosumab group as compared with a loss of 1.0% in the placebo group (P<0.001); significant differences between the two groups were seen at as early as 1 month and sustained through 36 months. Denosumab therapy was also associated with significant increases in bone mineral density at the total hip, femoral neck, and distal third of the radius at all time points. Patients who received denosumab had a decreased incidence of new vertebral fractures at 36 months (1.5%, vs. 3.9% with placebo) (relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.78; P=0.006). Rates of adverse events were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab was associated with increased bone mineral density at all sites and a reduction in the incidence of new vertebral fractures among men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00089674.)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0809003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 1468 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy, who have castrate levels of sex steroids, denosumab reduced vertebral fracture risk by 62%.

    “In 1468 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy, who have castrate levels of sex steroids, denosumab reduced vertebral fracture risk by 62% (49).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. R., Egerdie, B., Toriz, N. H., Feldman, R., Tammela, T. L. J., Saad, F., Heracek, J., Szwedowski, M., Ke, C., Kupic, A., Leder, B. Z., & Goessl, C.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI (MX)
  • Tampere University Hospital (FI)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-08-20
Volume
361
Issue
8
Pages
745-755
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1992053982
Cited by
1,140
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 134
FWCI
63.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • New England Research Institutes
  • Astellas Pharma
  • National Institutes of Health (5k24ca121990-02)
  • National Cancer Institute (K24-CA121990, 5K24 CA121990-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Keywords
denosumab, androgen deprivation therapy, prostate cancer, bone mineral density, vertebral fractures, bone loss, RANKL inhibition, non-metastatic prostate cancer, lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip
MeSH terms
Denosumab, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Androgen Antagonists, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Injections, Subcutaneous, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Lumbar Vertebrae, Male, Middle Aged, Orchiectomy, Osteoporosis, Prostatic Neoplasms, Bone Density, Incidence, Spinal Fractures, Bone Remodeling, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Fractures, Bone, RANK Ligand, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review