The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct Anabolic Response of Osteoblast to Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound
Abstract
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, a form of mechanical energy transmitted as high-frequency acoustical pressure waves, provides noninvasive therapeutic treatment for accelerating fracture repair and distraction osteogenesis. Relatively young osteoblasts respond to ultrasound by transiently upregulating message levels of immediate-early genes as well as that of osteocalcin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Osteocytes derived from newborn rat tibia and calvaria responded to a lesser extent only in c-fos and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) messages. Compared with the stretched osteocytes, which use stretch-activated and parathyroid hormone (PTH)-potentiated Ca2+ influx as an entry route to the protein kinase A (PKA) signal transduction pathways, there was no evidence of Ca2+ internalization by any of the cells tested on exposure to the ultrasound. On the other hand, inhibitors of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and upstream phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) blocked COX-2 and osteocalcin upregulation by the ultrasound-exposed ST2, murine bone marrow-derived cells. This is distinct from the aforementioned osteocytic response to low-frequency stretching and implies the involvement of integrins. Our findings suggested that accelerated fracture repair and distraction osteogenesis by the low-intensity pulsed ultrasound depend, at least in part, on the stimulation of osteoblastic cells at relatively early stages of osteogenic lineage. Bone is under control of multiple regulatory mechanisms so that diverse physical forces can be reflected to the microenvironment of each cell, in turn, to the entire bone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Activation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation
Dimmeler, S., Fleming, I., Fisslthaler, B., Hermann, C., Busse, R., & Zeiher, A. M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21224 · Cited by 3,591
Kleinnulend, J., Semeins, C. M., Ajubi, N. E., Nijweide, P. J., & Burger, E. H. (1995) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.2822 · Cited by 425
Rubin, J., Biskobing, D. M., Jadhav, L., Fan, D., Nanes, M. S., Perkins, S., & Fan, X. (1998) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo.139.3.5778 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound
Tyler, W. J., Tufail, Y., Finsterwald, M., Tauchmann, M. L., Olson, E. J., & Majestic, C. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003511 · Cited by 707
Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology
Huang, H., Kamm, R. D., & Lee, R. T. (2004) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00559.2003 · Cited by 548
p38 MAPK Signaling in Osteoblast Differentiation
Rodríguez-Carballo, E., Gámez, B., & Ventura, F. (2016) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2016.00040 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Naruse, K., Miyauchi, A., Itoman, M., & Mikuni-Takagaki, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 360-369
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2020802601
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct Anabolic Response of Osteoblast to Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.2.360
- The paper
- Naruse, K., Miyauchi, A., Itoman, M., & Mikuni-Takagaki, Y. (2003). Distinct Anabolic Response of Osteoblast to Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.2.360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.