The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound
Open accessAbstract
Possessing the ability to noninvasively elicit brain circuit activity yields immense experimental and therapeutic power. Most currently employed neurostimulation methods rely on the somewhat invasive use of stimulating electrodes or photon-emitting devices. Due to its ability to noninvasively propagate through bone and other tissues in a focused manner, the implementation of ultrasound (US) represents a compelling alternative approach to current neuromodulation strategies. Here, we investigated the influence of low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound (LILFU) on neuronal activity. By transmitting US waveforms through hippocampal slice cultures and ex vivo mouse brains, we determined LILFU is capable of remotely and noninvasively exciting neurons and network activity. Our results illustrate that LILFU can stimulate electrical activity in neurons by activating voltage-gated sodium channels, as well as voltage-gated calcium channels. The LILFU-induced changes in neuronal activity were sufficient to trigger SNARE-mediated exocytosis and synaptic transmission in hippocampal circuits. Because LILFU can stimulate electrical activity and calcium signaling in neurons as well as central synaptic transmission we conclude US provides a powerful tool for remotely modulating brain circuit activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice
Ang, E. S. B. C., Gluncic, V., Duque, A., Schafer, M. E., & Rakic, P. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605294103 · Cited by 265
In vitro effects of ultrasound with different energies on the conduction properties of neural tissue
Tsui, P.-H., Wang, S.-H., & Huang, C.-C. (2005) · Ultrasonics · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2004.12.003 · Cited by 149
Cited by
The blood-brain barrier: Physiology and strategies for drug delivery
Pandit, R., Chen, L., & Götz, J. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.11.009 · Cited by 651
Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing
Rivnay, J., Wang, H., Fenno, L., Deisseroth, K., & Malliaras, G. G. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601649 · Cited by 514
Low-intensity ultrasound neuromodulation: An overview of mechanisms and emerging human applications
Fomenko, A., Neudorfer, C., Dallapiazza, R. F., Kalia, S. K., & Lozano, A. M. (2018) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.013 · Cited by 322
Retinal stimulation strategies to restore vision: fundamentals and systems
Yue, L., Weiland, J. D., Roska, B., & Humayun, M. S. (2016) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.05.002 · Cited by 272
Transcranial Ultrasound (TUS) Effects on Mental States: A Pilot Study
Hameroff, S., Trakas, M., Duffield, C., Annabi, E., Gerace, M. B., Boyle, P., Lucas, A., Amos, Q., Buadu, A., & Badal, J. J. (2013) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.002 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Tyler, W. J., Tufail, Y., Finsterwald, M., Tauchmann, M. L., Olson, E. J., & Majestic, C.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-10-29
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e3511
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089845241
- Cited by
- 707
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0003511
- The paper
- Tyler, W. J., Tufail, Y., Finsterwald, M., Tauchmann, M. L., Olson, E. J., & Majestic, C. (2008). Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.