The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adverse Outcomes of Osteoporotic Fractures in the General Population
Abstract
Osteoporotic fractures exact a terrible toll on the population with respect to morbidity and cost, and to a lesser extent mortality, which will increase dramatically with the growing elderly population. Attention has focused on the 12-20% excess deaths after hip fracture, but most are caused by underlying medical conditions unrelated to osteoporosis. More important is fracture-related morbidity. An estimated 10% of patients are disabled by hip fracture, and 19% require institutionalization, accounting for almost 140,000 nursing home admissions annually in this country. Distal forearm and vertebral fractures less commonly result in nursing home placement, but about 10% of postmenopausal women have vertebral deformities that cause chronic pain, and a substantial minority have poor function after forearm fracture. These fractures interfere greatly with the activities of daily living, and all of them can have a substantial negative impact on quality of life. Annual expenditures for osteoporotic fracture care in the United States ($17.5 million in 2002 dollars) are dominated by hip fracture treatment, but vertebral fractures, distal forearm fractures, and importantly, the other fractures related to osteoporosis contribute one-third of the total. Although all fracture patients are at increased risk of future fractures, few of them are currently treated for osteoporosis, and only a subset (i.e., those with vertebral fractures) are considered candidates for many clinical trials. Eligibility criteria should be expanded and fracture end-points generalized to acknowledge the overall burden of osteoporotic fractures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Model of Lifetime Osteoporosis Impact
Chrischilles, E. A. (1991) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1991.00400100100017 · Cited by 467 · cited 4×
“Allowing for prior functional impairment, an estimated 7% of women with fractures of the hip, spine, or distal forearm become dependent in the basic activities of daily living.((11)) Again, hip fractures contribute the most to this burden.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective
Tosteson, A. N. A., Melton, L. J., Dawson-Hughes, B., Baim, S., Favus, M. J., Khosla, S., & Lindsay, R. L. (2008) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0550-6 · Cited by 441
Self-citationDevelopment and use of FRAX® in osteoporosis
Kanis, J. A., McCloskey, E. V., Johansson, H., Oden, A., Ström, O., & Borgström, F. (2010) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1253-y · Cited by 402
Reginster, J.-Y., Adami, S., Lakatos, P., Greenwald, M., Stepan, J. J., Silverman, S. L., Christiansen, C., Rowell, L., Mairon, N., Bonvoisin, B., et al. (2006) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2005.044958 · Cited by 326
Iguacel, I., Miguel-Berges, M. L., Gómez-Bruton, A., Moreno, L. A., & Julián, C. (2019) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuy045 · Cited by 222
(2008) · PubMed · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Melton, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1139-1141
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2137106918
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.