The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Contribution of Ethical Obligation and Self-identity to the Theory of Planned Behaviour: An Exploration of Ethical Consumers
Abstract
Whilst the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) has generated much research interest, many market researchers are divided over the addition of further constructs to the model. The TRA and its many modifications have been applied in numerous behavioural contexts, however, research to-date has neglected an emerging group of "ethical" consumers. This paper outlines results from a recent survey of over 1400 UK consumers that applied the TRA to this complex area of decision making. Using readers to the Ethical Consumer magazine, the study addresses issues involving proposed model modifications - specifically, by the addition of control, ethical obligation and self-identify. Management implications of the findings are discussed, including the importance of understanding consumers' self-identification with ethical issues in marketing communications programmes; and the underlying potential importance of ethical issues to mainstream consumer groups. Finally, the need to develop conceptually as well as practically robust techniques by using Structural Equation Modelling, which represents the next stage in this research, is outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x · Cited by 989
An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9 · Cited by 891
Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption
Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10008 · Cited by 572
Self-citationThe mindful consumer: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motivations to purchase local food
Birch, D., Memery, J., & De Silva Kanakaratne, M. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.013 · Cited by 272
Moraes, C., Carrigan, M., Bosangit, C., Ferreira, C., & McGrath, M. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2893-9 · Cited by 138
“Other developments of this model entail the inclusion of values as determinants of ethical consumption behaviour (Shaw et al. 2005), but these rationalist approaches suffer from a particular limitation regarding the assessment of consumers’ actions when motivated by ethical concerns (Raats et al.…”
BackgroundCaruana, R., Carrington, M. J., & Chatzidakis, A. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2444-9 · Cited by 123
Green apparel buying behaviour: A study on Indian youth
Khare, A., & Sadachar, A. (2017) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12367 · Cited by 94
Berki-Kiss, D., & Menrad, K. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.026 · Cited by 90
Impact of online social media activities on marketing of green products
Gupta, M., & Syed, A. A. (2022) · International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-02-2020-2037 · Cited by 46
The determinants of the intention to purchase animal welfare-friendly meat products in Spain
Gracia, A. (2013) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.22.2.255 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, D., Shiu, E., & Clarke, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 879-894
- ISSN
- 0267-257X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1376
- OpenAlex
- W2124612697
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
