Cited by 225Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsElder Abuse and Neglect

Intimate Partner Violence in China: National Prevalence, Risk Factors and Associated Health Problems

Open access
Parish, William L., Pan, Suiming, Luo, Ye, Wang, Tianfu, Laumann, Edward O.·2004·International Family Planning Perspectives

Abstract

CONTEXT: Intimate partner violence has been studied in many developed and developing countries. China remains one of the few large societies for which the prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence are unknown. METHODS: Data from a nationally representative sample of women and men aged 20-64 with a spouse or other steady partner provide estimates of intimate partner violence in China. Binomial and multinomial logistic regression analyses adjusted for sample design examine risk factors and negative outcomes associated with partner violence. RESULTS: Altogether, 34% of women and 18% of men had ever been hit during their current relationship; the prevalence of hitting resulting in bleeding, bruises, swelling, or severe pain and injuries was 12% for women and 5% for men. Significant risk factors for partner violence included sexual jealousy, patriarchal beliefs, low female contribution to household income, low male socioeconomic status, alcohol consumption and residence in regions other than the South and Southeast. Severe hitting was a significant risk factor for self-reported adverse general and sexual health outcomes, including sexual dysfunction, sexual dissatisfaction and unwanted sex. CONCLUSIONS: As in other societies, intimate partner violence in China is common and is correlated with adverse general and sexual health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1363/3017404

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parish, W. L., Pan, S., Luo, Y., Wang, T., & Laumann, E. O.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
ORCID
Luo, Ye
Venue
International Family Planning Perspectives
Published
2004-12
Volume
30
Issue
04
Pages
174-181
ISSN
0190-3187 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978123757
Cited by
225
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Family Planning Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Chicago
  • National Institutes of Health (AI50410)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30 AI50410, P30AI050410)
  • Fogarty International Center
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30 HD18288, P30HD018288, R01 HD34157, R01HD034157)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, domestic violence, prevalence, risk factors, sexual jealousy, patriarchy, household income, alcohol consumption, sexual health, sexual dysfunction, unwanted sex, China
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Risk Factors, Sex Offenses, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Spouse Abuse, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Domestic Violence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Risk Assessment, Battered Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review