Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison between optical and electrical interconnects based on power and speed considerations

Feldman, Michael R., Esener, Sadik C., Guest, Clark C., Lee, Sing H.·1988·Applied Optics

Abstract

Conditions are determined for which optical interconnects can transmit information at a higher data rate and consume lc3s power than the equivalent electrical interconnections. The analysis is performed for free-space optical intrachip communication links. Effects of scaling circuit dimensions, presence of signal fan-out, and the use of light modulators as optical signal transmitters are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ao.27.001742

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Feldman, M. R., Esener, S. C., Guest, C. C., & Lee, S. H.
Venue
Applied Optics
Published
1988-05-01
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
1742
ISSN
  • 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4522
OpenAlex
W1965432738
Cited by
388
References
5
FWCI
28.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison between optical and electrical interconnects based on power and speed considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ao.27.001742
The paper
Feldman, M. R., Esener, S. C., Guest, C. C., & Lee, S. H. (1988). Comparison between optical and electrical interconnects based on power and speed considerations. Applied Optics. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.27.001742

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.