Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,106

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Light scattering in lntralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400–1100 nm

van Staveren, Hugo J., Moes, Christian J. M., van Marie, Jan, Prahl, Scott A., van Gemert, Martin J. C.·1991·Applied Optics

Abstract

The absorption, scattering, and anisotropy coefficients of the fat emulsion Intralipid-10% have been measured at 457.9, 514.5, 632.8, and 1064 nm. The size and shape distributions of the scattering particles in Intralipid-10% were determined by transmission electron microscopy. Mie theory calculations performed by using the particle size distribution yielded values for the scattering and anisotropy coefficients from 400 to 1100 nm. The agreement with experimental values is better than 6%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ao.30.004507

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,106

Metadata

Authors
van Staveren, H. J., Moes, C. J. M., van Marie, J., Prahl, S. A., & van Gemert, M. J. C.
Venue
Applied Optics
Published
1991-11-01
Volume
30
Issue
31
Pages
4507
ISSN
  • 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4522
OpenAlex
W2132672139
Cited by
1,106
References
0
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light scattering in lntralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400–1100 nm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ao.30.004507
The paper
van Staveren, H. J., Moes, C. J. M., van Marie, J., Prahl, S. A., & van Gemert, M. J. C. (1991). Light scattering in lntralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400–1100 nm. Applied Optics. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.30.004507

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.