The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of the Roughness of the Sea Surface from Photographs of the Sun’s Glitter
Abstract
A method is developed for interpreting the statistics of the sun’s glitter on the sea surface in terms of the statistics of the slope distribution. The method consists of two principal phases: (1) of identifying, from geometric considerations, any point on the surface with the particular slope required for the reflection of the” sun’s rays toward the observer; and (2) of interpreting the average brightness of the sea surface in the vicinity of this point in terms of the frequency with which this particular slope occurs. The computation of the probability of large (and infrequent) slopes is limited by the disappearance of the glitter into a background consisting of (1) the sunlight scattered from particles beneath the sea surface, and (2) the skylight reflected by the sea surface.The method has been applied to aerial photographs taken under carefully chosen conditions in the Hawaiian area. Winds were measured from a vessel at the time and place of the aerial photographs, and cover a range from 1 to 14 m sec−1. The effect of surface slicks, laid by the vessel, are included in the study. A two-dimensional Gram-Charlier series is fitted to the data. As a first approximation the distribution is Gaussian and isotropic with respect to direction. The mean square slope (regardless of direction) increases linearly with the wind speed, reaching a value of (tan16°)2 for a wind speed of 14 m sec−1. The ratio of the up/ downwind to the crosswind component of mean square slope varies from 1.0 to 1.9. There is some up/downwind skewness which increases with increasing wind speed. As a result the most probable slope at high winds is not zero but a few degrees, with the azimuth of ascent pointing downwind. The measured peakedness which is barely above the limit of observational error, is such as to make the probability of very large and very small slopes greater than Gaussian. The effect of oil slicks covering an area of one-quarter square mile is to reduce the mean square slopes by a factor of two or three, to eliminate skewness, but to leave peakedness unchanged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A well‐calibrated ocean algorithm for special sensor microwave / imager
Wentz, F. J. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/96jc01751 · Cited by 837
Kilpatrick, K. A., Podestá, G. P., & Evans, R. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/1999jc000065 · Cited by 569
Sensor Capability and Atmospheric Correction in Ocean Colour Remote Sensing
Emberton, S., Chittka, L., Cavallaro, A., & Wang, M. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs8010001 · Cited by 486
Kay, S., Hedley, J. D., & Lavender, S. (2009) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs1040697 · Cited by 441
Satellite-derived bathymetry using the ICESat-2 lidar and Sentinel-2 imagery datasets
Ma, Y., Xu, N., Liu, Z., Yang, B., Yang, F., Wang, X. H., & Li, S. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.112047 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, C., & Munk, W.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1954-11-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 838
- ISSN
- 0030-3941 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075828063
- Cited by
- 2,512
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of the Roughness of the Sea Surface from Photographs of the Sun’s Glitter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josa.44.000838
- The paper
- Cox, C., & Munk, W. (1954). Measurement of the Roughness of the Sea Surface from Photographs of the Sun’s Glitter. Journal of the Optical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1364/josa.44.000838
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.