The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer
Open accessAbstract
Using the method of images, we examine the three boundary conditions commonly applied to the surface of a semi-infinite turbid medium. We find that the image-charge configurations of the partial-current and extrapolated-boundary conditions have the same dipole and quadrupole moments and that the two corresponding solutions to the diffusion equation are approximately equal. In the application of diffusion theory to frequency-domain photon-migration (FDPM) data, these two approaches yield values for the scattering and absorption coefficients that are equal to within 3%. Moreover, the two boundary conditions can be combined to yield a remarkably simple, accurate, and computationally fast method for extracting values for optical parameters from FDPM data. FDPM data were taken both at the surface and deep inside tissue phantoms, and the difference in data between the two geometries is striking. If one analyzes the surface data without accounting for the boundary, values deduced for the optical coefficients are in error by 50% or more. As expected, when aluminum foil was placed on the surface of a tissue phantom, phase and modulation data were closer to the results for an infinite-medium geometry. Raising the reflectivity of a tissue surface can, in principle, eliminate the effect of the boundary. However, we find that phase and modulation data are highly sensitive to the reflectivity in the range of 80-100%, and a minimum value of 98% is needed to mimic an infinite-medium geometry reliably. We conclude that noninvasive measurements of optically thick tissue require a rigorous treatment of the tissue boundary, and we suggest a unified partial-current--extrapolated boundary approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boas, D. A., Dale, A. M., & Franceschini, M. A. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.011 · Cited by 721
Kienle, A., & Patterson, M. S. (1997) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.14.000246 · Cited by 474
Troy, T., Jekic-McMullen, D., Sambucetti, L., & Rice, B. (2004) · Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1162/153535004773861688 · Cited by 418
A review of in‐vivo optical properties of human tissues and its impact on PDT
Sandell, J. L., & Zhu, T. C. (2011) · Journal of Biophotonics · doi:10.1002/jbio.201100062 · Cited by 384
Doornbos, R. M. P., Lang, R., Aalders, M. C., Cross, F. W., & Sterenborg, H. J. C. M. (1999) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/012 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Haskell, R. C., Svaasand, L. O., Tsay, T.-T., Feng, T.-C., Tromberg, B. J., & McAdams, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2727
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2065200530
- Cited by
- 1,138
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.11.002727
- The paper
- Haskell, R. C., Svaasand, L. O., Tsay, T.-T., Feng, T.-C., Tromberg, B. J., & McAdams, M. S. (1994). Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.11.002727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.