The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correction of the aberrations in the human eye with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator: limits to performance
Abstract
We evaluated the performance of a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator for static correction of the aberrations in the human eye. By applying phase-retrieval techniques to pairs of double-pass images we first estimated the wave aberration of the eye to be corrected. Then we introduced the opposite phase map in the modulator, which was placed in a plane conjugated with the eye's pupil, and we recorded double-pass images of a point source before and after correction of the aberrations. In a slightly aberrated artificial eye a clear improvement was obtained after correction, and, although diffraction-limited performance was not achieved, the results were close to the theoretical predictions. In the two living eyes that we studied some benefit also appeared in the correction, but the performance was worse than that expected. We evaluated possible explanations for the relatively poor performance that was obtained in the human eye: an incorrect estimate of the ocular aberration, the limited spatial resolution of the modulator, and the dynamic changes in the ocular aberrations. Based on the results in the artificial eye, the first problem was not considered to be a major source of error. However, we showed that the spatial resolution of the liquid-crystal spatial light modulator limits the maximum correction to be attained. In addition, the changes in the ocular optics over time also impose a limit in the performance of static corrections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography
DREXLER, W., & FUJIMOTO, J. (2008) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.005 · Cited by 906
Compensation of corneal aberrations by the internal optics in the human eye
Artal, P., Guirao, A., Berrio, E., & Williams, D. R. (2001) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/1.1.1 · Cited by 434
Self-citationAdaptive-optics ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography
Hermann, B., Fernández, E. J., Unterhuber, A., Sattmann, H., Fercher, A. F., Drexler, W., Prieto, P. M., & Artal, P. (2004) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.29.002142 · Cited by 379
Self-citationDynamics of the eye’s wave aberration
Hofer, H., Artal, P., Singer, B., Aragón, J. L., & Williams, D. R. (2001) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.18.000497 · Cited by 353
Self-citationNeural compensation for the eye’s optical aberrations
Artal, P., Chen, L., Fernández, E. J., Singer, B., Manzanera, S., & Williams, D. R. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.4.4 · Cited by 332
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vargas-Martı́n, F., Prieto, P. M., & Artal, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2552
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2117596334
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correction of the aberrations in the human eye with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator: limits to performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.15.002552
- The paper
- Vargas-Martı́n, F., Prieto, P. M., & Artal, P. (1998). Correction of the aberrations in the human eye with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator: limits to performance. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.15.002552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.