The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination
Abstract
More than 20 years ago, Tanner [Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 89, 752 (1961)] noted that observers asked to detect a signal act as though they are uncertain about the physical characteristics of the signal to be detected. The popular assumptions of probability summation and decision variable, taken together, imply this uncertainty. This paper defines and uncertainty model of visual detection that assumes that the observer is uncertain among many signals and chooses the likeliest. With only four parameters, the uncertainty model explains why d' is approximately a power function of contrast ("nonlinear transduction") and accurately predicts effects of summation, facilitation, noise, subjective criterion, and task for near-threshold contrast. Thus the uncertainty model offers a synthesis of much of our current understanding of visual contrast detection and discrimination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties
Legge, G. E. (1978) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90079-2 · Cited by 445
Cited by
The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance
Britten, K., Shadlen, M., Newsome, W., & Movshon, J. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-12-04745.1992 · Cited by 1,958
Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision
Newsome, W. T., Britten, K. H., & Movshon, J. A. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/341052a0 · Cited by 1,177
SENSE AND THE SINGLE NEURON: Probing the Physiology of Perception
Parker, A. J., & Newsome, W. T. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.227 · Cited by 801
Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold
Kontsevich, L. L., & Tyler, C. W. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00285-5 · Cited by 668
Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination
Boynton, G. M., Demb, J. B., Glover, G. H., & Heeger, D. J. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00113-8 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Pelli, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1985-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1508
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W1986214687
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.2.001508
- The paper
- Pelli, D. G. (1985). Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.2.001508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.