The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive optics retinal imaging reveals S-cone dystrophy in tritan color vision deficiency
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“More recently, two new mutations--replacement of arginine at position 283 with glutamine, and replacement of leucine at position 56 with proline--have been found as causes of tritan defects”
From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Baraas et al., 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“In a recent study a father and his daughter, both of whom made tritan errors, were both shown to be heterozygous for a substitution of glutamine instead of the normally occurring arginine at position 283 of the S opsin. The father's tritan phenotype was severe, whereas the daughter's was relatively mild. Adaptive optics imaging revealed an absence of S cones in the father, but S cones were clearly”
From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Baraas et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Taken together, the findings indicate that inherited tritan defects are associated with a progressive degeneration of the S cones, analogous to the degeneration of rods in retinitis pigmentosa (Baraas et al., 2007).”
From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Baraas et al., 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photoreceptor degeneration and dysfunction in aging and age-related maculopathy
Jackson, G. R., Owsley, C., & Curcio, C. A. (2002) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s1568-1637(02)00007-7 · Cited by 317
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- Wright, 1952, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 42, 509, 10.1364/JOSA.42.000509 · DOI
- Cole, 1966, Vision Res., 6, 301, 10.1016/0042-6989(66)90064-2 · DOI
- Kalmus, 1955, Ann. Hum. Genet., 20, 39, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01277.x · DOI · Paper page
- Miyake, 1985, Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago), 103, 1496, 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050100072022 · DOI
- Neuhann, 1976, Mod. Probl. Ophthalmol., 17, 135
- Pokorny, 1981, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 71, 1327, 10.1364/JOSA.71.001327 · DOI
- Went, 1985, Hum. Genet., 69, 255, 10.1007/BF00293036 · DOI
- Gunther, 2006, Visual Neurosci., 23, 403, 10.1017/S0952523806233169 · DOI · Paper page
- Weitz, 1992, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 50, 498
- Weitz, 1992, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 51, 444
- Hwa, 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 94, 10571, 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10571 · DOI
- Sheffield, 1991, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 49, 699
- Regan, 1994, Vision Res., 34, 1279, 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90203-8 · DOI
- Hofer, 2001, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 18, 497, 10.1364/JOSAA.18.000497 · DOI
- Liang, 1997, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 14, 2884, 10.1364/JOSAA.14.002884 · DOI
- Pallikaris, 2003, Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 44, 4580, 10.1167/iovs.03-0094 · DOI
- Roorda, 2001, Vision Res., 41, 1291, 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00043-8 · DOI
- Roorda, 1999, Nature, 397, 520, 10.1038/17383 · DOI
- Galli-Resta, 1999, Eur. J. Neurosci., 11, 1461, 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00555.x · DOI
- Wässle, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 200, 441, 10.1098/rspb.1978.0026 · DOI
- Zhan, 2000, Visual Neurosci., 17, 23, 10.1017/S0952523800171032 · DOI
- Kinnear, 2002, Br. J. Ophthamol., 86, 1408, 10.1136/bjo.86.12.1408 · DOI
- Smith, 1985, Am. J. Ophthalmol., 100, 176, 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)75002-0 · DOI
- Kurtenbach, 1999, Br. J. Ophthamol., 83, 43, 10.1136/bjo.83.1.43 · DOI
- Stenkamp, 2002, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1565, 168, 10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00567-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Hofer, 2005, J. Neurosci., 25, 9669, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2414-05.2005 · DOI · Paper page
- Carroll, 2004, Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 45, 4341
- Coletta, 1987, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 4, 1503, 10.1364/JOSAA.4.001503 · DOI
- Williams, 1987, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 4, 1514, 10.1364/JOSAA.4.001514 · DOI
- Putnam, 2005, J. Vision, 5, 632, 10.1167/5.7.3 · DOI
- Curcio, 1991, J. Comp. Neurol., 312, 610, 10.1002/cne.903120411 · DOI
- Curcio, 1990, J. Comp. Neurol., 292, 497, 10.1002/cne.902920402 · DOI
- Gao, 1992, Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 33, 1
- Spear, 1993, Vision Res., 33, 2589, 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90218-L · DOI
- Hoang, 2002, Visual Neurosci., 19, 395, 10.1017/S0952523802194028 · DOI
- Hendrickson, 1984, Ophthalmology, 91, 603, 10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34247-6 · DOI
- Yuodelis, 1986, Vision Res., 26, 847, 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90143-4 · DOI
- Diaz-Araya, 1992, Visual Neurosci., 8, 505, 10.1017/S0952523800005605 · DOI
- Carroll, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101, 8461, 10.1073/pnas.0401440101 · DOI · Paper page
- Dryja, 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 88, 9370, 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9370 · DOI
- Sung, 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 88, 6481, 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6481 · DOI
- Curcio, 1993, Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 34, 3278
- Henry, 1964, Ann. Hum. Genet., 27, 219, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1963.tb00788.x · DOI
- Neitz, 2000, Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago), 118, 691, 10.1001/archopht.118.5.691 · DOI
- Carroll, 2002, J. Vision, 2, 531, 10.1167/2.8.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Sharpe, 1998, J. Neurosci., 18, 10053, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10053.1998 · DOI
- Shevell, 1998, Vision Res., 38, 3371, 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00434-3 · DOI
- Neitz, 1996, Science, 274, 801, 10.1126/science.274.5288.801 · DOI · Paper page
- Parry, 2004, Biochemistry, 43, 8014, 10.1021/bi049478w · DOI
- Yokoyama, 2006, Gene, 365, 95, 10.1016/j.gene.2005.09.028 · DOI
- Fasick, 1999, Biochemistry, 38, 11593, 10.1021/bi991600h · DOI · Paper page
- Dartnall, 1983, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 220, 115, 10.1098/rspb.1983.0091 · DOI
- Krill, 1971, Invest. Ophthalmol., 10, 457
- Smith, 1973, Invest. Ophthalmol., 12, 608
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genetics of normal and defective color vision
Neitz, J., & Neitz, M. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.002 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baraas, R. C., Carroll, J., Gunther, K. L., Chung, M., Williams, D. R., Foster, D. H., & Neitz, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2007-04-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1438
- ISSN
- 1084-7529
- 1520-8532
- PMC
- PMC2082754
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
