The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contrast discrimination in noise
Abstract
Even the highest contrast sensitivities that humans can achieve for the detection of targets on uniform fields fall far short of ideal values. Recent theoretical formulations have attributed departures from ideal performance to two factors--the existence of internal noise within the observer and suboptimal stimulus information sampling by the observer. It has been postulated that the contributions of these two factors can be evaluated separately by measuring contrast-detection thresholds as a function of the level of externally added visual noise. We wished to determine whether a similar analysis could be applied to contrast discrimination and whether variation of the increment threshold with pedestal contrast is due to changes in internal noise or sampling efficiency. We measured contrast-increment thresholds as a function of noise spectral density for near-threshold and suprathreshold pedestal contrasts. The experiments were conducted separately for static and dynamic noise. Our findings indicate that the same formulation can be applied to contrast discrimination and that changes in the estimated values of internal noise, rather than changes in sampling efficiency, play the major role in determining properties of contrast discrimination. Implications for models of contrast coding in vision are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boneau, C. A., & Hays, W. L. (1966) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420739 · Cited by 1,881
Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.
Campbell, F. W., & Green, D. G. (1965) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784 · Cited by 1,595
Contrast masking in human vision
Legge, G. E., & Foley, J. M. (1980) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.70.001458 · Cited by 1,182
Self-citationUncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination
Pelli, D. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001508 · Cited by 670
Efficiency of Human Visual Signal Discrimination
Burgess, A. E., Wagner, R. F., Jennings, R. J., & Barlow, H. B. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7280685 · Cited by 411
Self-citationGrating contrast: Discrimination may be better than detection
Nachmias, J., & Sansbury, R. V. (1974) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(74)90175-8 · Cited by 395
Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision
Foley, J. M., & Legge, G. E. (1981) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(81)90009-2 · Cited by 293
Self-citationWatson, A. B., Barlow, H. B., & Robson, J. G. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/302419a0 · Cited by 284
A power law for contrast discrimination
Legge, G. E. (1981) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(81)90092-4 · Cited by 267
Self-citationTolhurst, D. J., Movshon, J. A., & Thompson, I. D. (1981) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00238900 · Cited by 260
Cited by
The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision
Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/5.5.1 · Cited by 691
Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold
Kontsevich, L. L., & Tyler, C. W. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00285-5 · Cited by 668
The psychophysics of visual search
Palmer, J., Verghese, P., & Pavel, M. (2000) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00244-8 · Cited by 454
A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (2005) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/5.9.6 · Cited by 329
From Gestalt Theory to Image Analysis: A Probabilistic Approach
Desolneux, A., Moisan, L., & Morel, J.-M. (2008) · Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74378-3 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Legge, G. E., Kersten, D., & Burgess, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1987-02-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 391
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2170683674
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrast discrimination in noise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.4.000391
- The paper
- Legge, G. E., Kersten, D., & Burgess, A. E. (1987). Contrast discrimination in noise. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.4.000391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.