The DOI matches its Crossref record.
General analysis and optimization of the four-detector photopolarimeter
Abstract
The four-detector photopolarimeter (FDP) is analyzed for an arbitrary spatial configuration and any reflection characteristics (ri, ψi, Δi,) of the first three detectors. The instrument matrix A, which relates the output signal vector I to the input Stokes vector S by I = AS, and its determinant are derived explicitly. The essential condition that A be nonsingular (det A ≠ 0) is satisfied in general with uncoated absorbing detector surfaces, assuming that the plane of incidence (POI) is rotated between successive reflections by other than 90°. Therefore no special coatings on the detectors are required, and a thin dielectric (e.g., thermal oxide) layer would suffice. The differential reflection phase shift Δ is unrestricted for the first and third detectors and has optimum values of ±90° for the second. The optimum rotation angles of the POI are ±45° and ±135°. The optimum values of the surface parameter ψ are 27.37°, 22.5° or 67.5°, and 0 or 90° for the first, second, and third reflections, respectively. The following topics are also considered: (1) the partition of energy among detectors, (2) the effect of tilting the last detector, (3) operation of the FDP over a broadband spectral range, (4) choice of the light-beam path, and (5) calibration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera
Rubin, N. A., D’Aversa, G., Chevalier, P., Shi, Z., Chen, W. T., & Capasso, F. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax1839 · Cited by 1,017
Tyo, J. S. (2002) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.41.000619 · Cited by 347
Optimal Frames for Polarization State Reconstruction
Foreman, M. R., Favaro, A., & Aiello, A. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.263901 · Cited by 90
Experimental polarization state tomography using optimal polarimeters
Ling, A., Soh, K. P., Lamas-Linares, A., & Kurtsiefer, C. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.022309 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Azzam, R. M. A., Elminyawi, I. M., & El-Saba, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1988-05-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 681
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2060544541
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General analysis and optimization of the four-detector photopolarimeter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.5.000681
- The paper
- Azzam, R. M. A., Elminyawi, I. M., & El-Saba, A. M. (1988). General analysis and optimization of the four-detector photopolarimeter. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.5.000681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.