Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design of optimal polarimeters: maximization of signal-to-noise ratio and minimization of systematic error

Tyo, J. Scott·2002·Applied Optics

Abstract

The relationship between system condition and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in reconstructed Stokes parameter images is investigated for rotating compensator, variable retardance, and rotating analyzer Stokes vector (SV) polarimeters. A variety of optimal configurations are presented for each class of systems. The operation of polarimeters is discussed in terms of a four-dimensional conical vector space; and the concept of nonorthogonal bases, frames, and tight frames is introduced to describe the operation of SV polarimeters. Although SNR is an important consideration, performance of a polarimeter in the presence of errors in the calibration and alignment of the optical components is also important. The relationship between system condition and error performance is investigated, and it is shown that an optimum system from the point of view of SNR is not always an optimum system with respect to error performance. A detailed theory of error performance is presented, and the error of a SV polarimeter is shown to be related to the stability and condition number of the polarization processing matrices. The rms error is found to fall off as the inverse of the number of measurements taken. Finally, the concepts used to optimize SV polarimeters are extended to be useful for full Mueller matrix polarimeters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ao.41.000619

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Tyo, J. S.
Venue
Applied Optics
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
619
ISSN
  • 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4522
OpenAlex
W2003895198
Cited by
347
References
8
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design of optimal polarimeters: maximization of signal-to-noise ratio and minimization of systematic error. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ao.41.000619
The paper
Tyo, J. S. (2002). Design of optimal polarimeters: maximization of signal-to-noise ratio and minimization of systematic error. Applied Optics. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.41.000619

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.