The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frequency-resolved optical gating with the use of second-harmonic generation
Abstract
We discuss the use of second-harmonic generation (SHG) as the nonlinearity in the technique of frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG) for measuring the full intensity and phase evolution of an arbitrary ultrashort pulse. FROG that uses a third-order nonlinearity in the polarization-gate geometry has proved extremely successful, and the algorithm required for extraction of the intensity and the phase from the experimental data is quite robust. However, for pulse intensities less than ~1 MW, third-order nonlinearities generate insufficient signal strength, and therefore SHG FROG appears necessary. We discuss the theoretical, algorithmic, and experimental considerations of SHG FROG in detail. SHG FROG has an ambiguity in the direction of time, and its traces are somewhat unintuitive. Also, previously published algorithms are generally ineffective at extracting the intensity and the phase of an arbitrary laser pulse from the SHG FROG trace. We present an improved pulse-retrieval algorithm, based on the method of generalized projections, that is far superior to the previously published algorithms, although it is still not so robust as the polarization-gate algorithm. We discuss experimental sources of error such as pump depletion and group-velocity mismatch. We also present several experimental examples of pulses measured with SHG FROG and show that the derived intensities and phases are in agreement with more conventional diagnostic techniques, and we demonstrate the high-dynamic-range capability of SHG FROG. We conclude that, despite the above drawbacks, SHG FROG should be useful in measuring low-energy pulses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shaped-pulse optimization of coherent emission of high-harmonic soft X-rays
Bartels, R., Backus, S., Zeek, E., Misoguti, L., Vdovin, G., Christov, I. P., Murnane, M. M., & Kapteyn, H. C. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35018029 · Cited by 713
Spectral resolution and sampling issues in Fourier-transform spectral interferometry
Dorrer, C., Belabas, N., Likforman, J.-P., & Joffre, M. (2000) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.17.001795 · Cited by 364
Recent advances in petahertz electric field sampling
Herbst, A., Scheffter, K., Bidhendi, M. M., Kieker, M., Srivastava, A., & Fattahi, H. (2022) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ac8032 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- DeLong, K. W., Trebino, R., Hunter, J., & White, W. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America B
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2206
- ISSN
- 0740-3224 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8540
- OpenAlex
- W2130998902
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency-resolved optical gating with the use of second-harmonic generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josab.11.002206
- The paper
- DeLong, K. W., Trebino, R., Hunter, J., & White, W. E. (1994). Frequency-resolved optical gating with the use of second-harmonic generation. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.11.002206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.