The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative study of single molecule location estimation techniques
Open accessAbstract
Estimating the location of single molecules from microscopy images is a key step in many quantitative single molecule data analysis techniques. Different algorithms have been advocated for the fitting of single molecule data, particularly the nonlinear least squares and maximum likelihood estimators. Comparisons were carried out to assess the performance of these two algorithms in different scenarios. Our results show that both estimators, on average, are able to recover the true location of the single molecule in all scenarios we examined. However, in the absence of modeling inaccuracies and low noise levels, the maximum likelihood estimator is more accurate than the nonlinear least squares estimator, as measured by the standard deviations of its estimates, and attains the best possible accuracy achievable for the sets of imaging and experimental conditions that were tested. Although neither algorithm is consistently superior to the other in the presence of modeling inaccuracies or misspecifications, the maximum likelihood algorithm emerges as a robust estimator producing results with consistent accuracy across various model mismatches and misspecifications. At high noise levels, relative to the signal from the point source, neither algorithm has a clear accuracy advantage over the other. Comparisons were also carried out for two localization accuracy measures derived previously. Software packages with user-friendly graphical interfaces developed for single molecule location estimation (EstimationTool) and limit of the localization accuracy calculations (FandPLimitTool) are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Precise Nanometer Localization Analysis for Individual Fluorescent Probes
Thompson, R. E., Larson, D. R., & Webb, W. W. (2002) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75618-x · Cited by 2,320
Cited by
Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy
Sage, D., Kirshner, H., Pengo, T., Stuurman, N., Min, J., Manley, S., & Unser, M. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3442 · Cited by 396
Single-molecule spectroscopy and imaging over the decades
Moerner, W. E., Shechtman, Y., & Wang, Q. (2015) · Faraday Discussions · doi:10.1039/c5fd00149h · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraham, A. V., Ram, S., Chao, J., Ward, E. S., & Ober, R. J.
- Venue
- Optics Express
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2009-12-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 23352
- ISSN
- 1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999727451
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative study of single molecule location estimation techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/oe.17.023352
- The paper
- Abraham, A. V., Ram, S., Chao, J., Ward, E. S., & Ober, R. J. (2009). Quantitative study of single molecule location estimation techniques. Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.17.023352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.