CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 93

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transport of orbital-angular-momentum entanglement through a turbulent atmosphere

Pors, Bart-Jan, Monken, C. H., Eliel, Eric R., Woerdman, J. P.·2011·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.19.006671
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.19.006671

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonuniform refractive index profiles caused by variations in temperature and pressure result in unwanted coupling within high-dimensional degrees of freedom in classical links and a loss of entanglement for quantum channels.

    “Nonuniform refractive index profiles caused by variations in temperature and pressure result in unwanted coupling within these high-dimensional DoFs in classical links (23–27) and a loss of entanglement for quantum channels (28–33)”

    From Topological robustness of optical skyrmions through a real-world free-space link (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Mair, 2001, Nature, 412, 313, 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Kawase, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 050501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.050501 · DOI
  3. Pors, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 120502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.120502 · DOI
  4. de Riedmatten, 2002, Quant. Inf. Comput., 2, 425
  5. Ali-Khan, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 060503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.060503 · DOI
  6. Durt, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 69, 032313, 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.032313 · DOI
  7. Brukner, 2003, Int. J. Quantum Inf., 1, 519, 10.1142/S0219749903000395 · DOI
  8. Poppe, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 3865, 10.1364/OPEX.12.003865 · DOI
  9. Zhang, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 5776, 10.1364/OE.16.005776 · DOI
  10. Salart, 2008, Nature, 454, 861, 10.1038/nature07121 · DOI
  11. Resch, 2005, Opt. Express, 13, 202, 10.1364/OPEX.13.000202 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Peng, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 150501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.150501 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ursin, 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 481, 10.1038/nphys629 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Paterson, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 153901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.153901 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gibson, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 5448, 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  16. Gopaul, 2007, N. J. Phys., 9, 94, 10.1088/1367-2630/9/4/094 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gbur, 2008, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 25, 225, 10.1364/JOSAA.25.000225 · DOI
  18. Anguita, 2008, Appl. Opt., 47, 2414, 10.1364/AO.47.002414 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Walborn, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 77, 062323, 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.062323 · DOI
  20. Tyler, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 142, 10.1364/OL.34.000142 · DOI
  21. Torres, 2003, Phys. Rev. A, 68, 050301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.050301 · DOI · Paper page
  22. van Exter, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 6431, 10.1364/OE.15.006431 · DOI
  23. Pors, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 77, 033845, 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.033845 · DOI
  24. Keskin, 2006, Appl. Opt., 45, 4888, 10.1364/AO.45.004888 · DOI
  25. Fried, 1966, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 56, 1372, 10.1364/JOSA.56.001372 · DOI
  26. Fante, 1975, Proc. IEEE, 63, 1669, 10.1109/PROC.1975.10035 · DOI
  27. Lucke, 2007, Appl. Opt., 46, 559, 10.1364/AO.46.000559 · DOI
  28. Levine, 1998, Appl. Opt., 37, 4553, 10.1364/AO.37.004553 · DOI
  29. Kral, 2005, Opt. Lett., 30, 1767, 10.1364/OL.30.001767 · DOI
  30. Schumacher, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 54, 2614, 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2614 · DOI
  31. Ryu, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 77, 052312, 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.052312 · DOI
  32. Jha, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 053832, 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.053832 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Fried, 1982, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 72, 52, 10.1364/JOSA.72.000052 · DOI
  34. Johnston, 2003, Appl. Opt., 42, 3451, 10.1364/AO.42.003451 · DOI
  35. Roggemann, 1997, Rev. Mod. Phys., 69, 437, 10.1103/RevModPhys.69.437 · DOI
  36. Li, 2004, Chin. Astron. Astrophys., 28, 222, 10.1016/S0275-1062(04)90026-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pors, B.-J., Monken, C. H., Eliel, E. R., & Woerdman, J. P.
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2011-03-24
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
6671
ISSN
1094-4087
DOI
10.1364/oe.19.006671
Cited by
93
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review