CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polarization pattern of vector vortex beams generated by q-plates with different topological charges

Cardano, Filippo, Karimi, Ebrahim, Slussarenko, Sergei, Marrucci, Lorenzo, de Lisio, Corrado, Santamato, Enrico·2012·Applied Optics
DOI 10.1364/ao.51.0000c1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ao.51.0000c1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The QP raises or lowers the OAM of the incoming photon according to its SAM state, while leaving the photon in the same optical beam, with no deflections or diffractions.

    “In particular, the QP raises or lowers the OAM of the incoming photon according to its SAM state, while leaving the photon in the same optical beam, that is, with no deflections or diffractions.”

    From Quantum walks and wavepacket dynamics on a lattice with twisted photons (2015) · cites this paper as [31]

    Section III states that a tuned q-plate gives the optical field a helical wavefront whose handedness depends on the input circular polarization; Section IV describes the resulting transmitted beam. These passages support the SAM-dependent OAM change, but our copy does not establish the additional claim that there are no deflections or diffractions. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • A spectrum analyzer is capable of measuring the instantaneous power and phase distributions of OAM components.

    “In this direction, a spectrum analyzer is a device capable to measure the instantaneous power and phase distributions of OAM components [48,52,[69][70][71][72][73][74].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Experiment section (page unavailable) describes CCD-based polarization tomography and reconstruction of a beam’s polarization pattern, not an OAM spectrum analyzer. Searches for instantaneous power and phase measurements of OAM components found no passage in our copy addressing that capability. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Zhan, 2009, Adv. Opt. Photon., 1, 1, 10.1364/AOP.1.000001 · DOI
  2. Nye, 1999, Natural Focusing and the Fine Structure of Light
  3. Dennis, 2009, Prog. Opt., 53, 293, 10.1016/S0079-6638(08)00205-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Soskin, 2001, Prog. Opt., 42, 219, 10.1016/S0079-6638(01)80018-4 · DOI
  5. Franke-Arnold, 2008, Laser Photonics Rev., 2, 299, 10.1002/lpor.200810007 · DOI
  6. Dorn, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 233901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.233901 · DOI
  7. Wang, 2008, Nat. Photon., 2, 501, 10.1038/nphoton.2008.127 · DOI
  8. Zhan, 2002, Opt. Express, 10, 324, 10.1364/OE.10.000324 · DOI
  9. Varin, 2002, Appl. Phys. B, 74, S83, 10.1007/s00340-002-0906-8 · DOI
  10. Novotny, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 5251, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5251 · DOI
  11. Bouhelier, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 013903, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.013903 · DOI
  12. Lu, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 1870, 10.1364/OL.34.001870 · DOI
  13. Zhan, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 3377, 10.1364/OPEX.12.003377 · DOI
  14. Oron, 2000, Appl. Phys. Lett., 77, 3322, 10.1063/1.1327271 · DOI
  15. Kozawa, 2005, Opt. Lett., 30, 3063, 10.1364/OL.30.003063 · DOI
  16. Kawauchi, 2008, Opt. Lett., 33, 1984, 10.1364/OL.33.001984 · DOI
  17. Wang, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 3549, 10.1364/OL.32.003549 · DOI
  18. Churin, 1993, Opt. Commun., 99, 13, 10.1016/0030-4018(93)90697-4 · DOI
  19. Bomzon, 2002, Opt. Lett., 27, 285, 10.1364/OL.27.000285 · DOI
  20. Machavariani, 2008, Opt. Commun., 281, 732, 10.1016/j.optcom.2007.10.088 · DOI
  21. Fadeyeva, 2010, Opt. Lett., 35, 3787, 10.1364/OL.35.003787 · DOI
  22. Stàlder, 1996, Opt. Lett., 21, 1948, 10.1364/OL.21.001948 · DOI
  23. Marrucci, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 163905, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Marrucci, 2011, J. Opt., 13, 064001, 10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Nagali, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 18745, 10.1364/OE.17.018745 · DOI
  26. Marrucci, 2006, Appl. Phys. Lett., 88, 221102, 10.1063/1.2207993 · DOI
  27. Karimi, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 053813, 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.053813 · DOI
  28. Karimi, 2009, Appl. Phys. Lett., 94, 231124, 10.1063/1.3154549 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Piccirillo, 2010, Appl. Phys. Lett., 97, 241104, 10.1063/1.3527083 · DOI
  30. Slussarenko, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 4085, 10.1364/OE.19.004085 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Holleczek, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 9714, 10.1364/OE.19.009714 · DOI
  32. Karimi, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 82, 022115, 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.022115 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cardano, F., Karimi, E., Slussarenko, S., Marrucci, L., de Lisio, C., & Santamato, E.
Venue
Applied Optics
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2012-03-05
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
C1
ISSN
  • 1559-128X
  • 2155-3165
DOI
10.1364/ao.51.0000c1
Cited by
415
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
7th Framework Programme of the European Commission (255914)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review