Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient generation and sorting of orbital angular momentum eigenmodes of light by thermally tuned q-plates

Karimi, Ebrahim, Piccirillo, Bruno, Nagali, Eleonora, Marrucci, Lorenzo, Santamato, Enrico·2009·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

We present methods for generating and for sorting specific orbital angular momentum (OAM) eigenmodes of a light beam with high efficiency, using a liquid crystal birefringent plate with unit topological charge known as “q-plate.” The generation efficiency has been optimized by tuning the optical retardation of the q-plate with temperature. The measured OAM m=±2 eigenmodes generation efficiency from an input TEM00 beam was of 97%. Mode sorting of the two input OAM m=±2 eigenmodes was achieved with an efficiency of 81%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3154549

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hybrid encoding between polarization and OAM can enhance sensitivity to angular rotations.

    “Related to the capability of producing alignment-free states, hybrid encoding between polarization and OAM can be exploited to enhance the sensitivity to angular rotations [65,106].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [65]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 2003, Optical Angular Momentum
  2. 2008, Laser Photonics Rev., 2, 299, 10.1002/lpor.200810007 · DOI
  3. 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 5448, 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  4. 2001, Nature (London), 412, 313, 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 305, 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
  6. 1990, JETP Lett., 52, 429
  7. 1994, Opt. Commun., 112, 321, 10.1016/0030-4018(94)90638-6 · DOI
  8. 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 3548, 10.1364/OPEX.12.003548 · DOI
  9. 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 013601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.013601 · DOI
  10. 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 163905, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2006, Appl. Phys. Lett., 88, 221102, 10.1063/1.2207993 · DOI
  12. 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 1225, 10.1364/OL.34.001225 · DOI
  13. 1992, Opt. Quantum Electron., 24, S951, 10.1007/BF01588597 · DOI
  14. 1995, J. Mod. Opt., 42, 217, 10.1080/09500349514550171 · DOI
  15. 2003, Astrophys. J., 597, 1266, 10.1086/378623 · DOI
  16. 2008, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 488, 148, 10.1080/15421400802240524 · DOI
  17. 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 3053, 10.1364/OL.32.003053 · DOI
  18. 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 10200, 10.1364/OE.16.010200 · DOI
  19. 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 8287, 10.1364/OE.17.008287 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Karimi, E., Piccirillo, B., Nagali, E., Marrucci, L., & Santamato, E.
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2009-06-08
Volume
94
Issue
23
ISSN
  • 0003-6951
  • 1077-3118
Cited by
251
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review