CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Realization of mutually unbiased bases for a qubit with only one wave plate: theory and experiment

Hou, Zhibo, Xiang, Guoyong, Dong, Daoyi, Li, Chuan-Feng, Guo, Guang-Can·2015·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.23.010018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.23.010018

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polarization encoding has played an important role in many quantum information investigations, ranging from quantum simulation to quantum computation and communication.

    “Polarization encoding has always played an important role in a significant number of investigations in quantum information, ranging from quantum simulation [16,17] to quantum computation [18][19][20][21][22] and communication [23,24].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction describes applications of mutually unbiased bases in quantum key distribution and quantum state estimation, and §2.1 describes measurements on polarization qubits in optical experiments. This supports the broad point that polarization is important in quantum-information work, but the paper does not establish the claimed range extending to quantum simulation and computation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Zauner, 2011, Int. J. Quantum Inf., 09, 445, 10.1142/S0219749911006776 · DOI
  2. Renes, 2004, J. Math. Phys., 45, 2171, 10.1063/1.1737053 · DOI
  3. Roy, 2007, J. Math. Phys., 48, 072110, 10.1063/1.2748617 · DOI
  4. Scott, 2006, J. Phys. A Math. Gen., 39, 13507, 10.1088/0305-4470/39/43/009 · DOI
  5. de Burgh, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 78, 052122, 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.052122 · DOI
  6. Durt, 2010, Int. J. Quantum Inf., 8, 535, 10.1142/S0219749910006502 · DOI
  7. Wootters, 1989, Ann. Phys., 191, 363, 10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9 · DOI
  8. Gisin, 2002, Rev. Mod. Phys., 74, 145, 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Wehner, 2010, New J. Phys., 12, 025009, 10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025009 · DOI
  10. Wu, 2009, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 022104, 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.022104 · DOI
  11. Ballester, 2007, Phys. Rev. A, 75, 022319, 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022319 · DOI
  12. Lima, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 3542, 10.1364/OE.19.003542 · DOI
  13. Adamson, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 030406, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.030406 · DOI
  14. Qi, 2013, Sci. Rep., 3, 3496, 10.1038/srep03496 · DOI
  15. Fan, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 18339, 10.1364/OE.15.018339 · DOI
  16. Cramer, 2010, Nat. Commun., 1, 149, 10.1038/ncomms1147 · DOI
  17. Mahler, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 183601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.183601 · DOI
  18. Kravtsov, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 062122, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.062122 · DOI
  19. Salvail, 2013, Nat. Photon., 7, 316, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Simon, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 85, 022323, 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022323 · DOI
  21. De Zela, 2012, Phys. Lett. A, 376, 1664, 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.03.042 · DOI
  22. Rosset, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 86, 062325, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.062325 · DOI
  23. Mohammadi, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 012117, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.012117 · DOI
  24. Mohammadi, 2014, Phys. Rev. A, 89, 012113, 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.012113 · DOI
  25. Brierley, 2009, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 052316, 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.052316 · DOI
  26. Benedetto, 2003, Adv. Comput. Math., 18, 357, 10.1023/A:1021323312367 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hou, Z., Xiang, G., Dong, D., Li, C.-F., & Guo, G.-C.
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
10018
ISSN
1094-4087
DOI
10.1364/oe.23.010018
Cited by
19
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Australian Research Councils Discovery Projects (DP130101658)
  • National Fundamental Research Program (2011CB9211200, 2011CBA00200)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61108009, 61222504)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review