CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and ApplicationsNear-Field Optical Microscopy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How an oxide shell affects the ultraviolet plasmonic behavior of Ga, Mg, and Al nanostructures

Open access
Gutierrez, Yael, Ortiz, Dolores, Sanz, Juan M., Saiz, Jose M., Gonzalez, Francisco, Everitt, Henry O., Moreno, Fernando·2016·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.24.020621
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The ultraviolet (UV) range presents new challenges for plasmonics, with interesting applications ranging from engineering to biology. In previous research, gallium, aluminum, and magnesium were found to be very promising UV plasmonic metals. However, a native oxide shell surrounds nanostructures of these metals that affects their plasmonic response. Here, through a nanoparticle-oxide core-shell model, we present a detailed electromagnetic analysis of how oxidation alters the UV-plasmonic response of spherical or hemisphere-on-substrate nanostructures made of those metals by analyzing the spectral evolution of two parameters: the absorption efficiency (far-field analysis) and the enhancement of the local intensity averaged over the nanoparticle surface (near-field analysis).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.24.020621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Aslan, 2005, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 9, 538, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.08.021 · DOI
  2. Lieberman, 2008, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 47, 4855, 10.1002/anie.200800231 · DOI
  3. Anker, 2008, Nat. Mater., 7, 442, 10.1038/nmat2162 · DOI
  4. Taguchi, 2009, J. Raman Spectrosc., 40, 1324, 10.1002/jrs.2287 · DOI
  5. Chowdhury, 2009, Anal. Chem., 81, 1397, 10.1021/ac802118s · DOI
  6. Sanz, 2013, J. Phys. Chem. C, 117, 19606, 10.1021/jp405773p · DOI
  7. Knight, 2012, Nano Lett., 12, 6000, 10.1021/nl303517v · DOI
  8. Knight, 2014, ACS Nano, 8, 834, 10.1021/nn405495q · DOI · Paper page
  9. Zeman, 1987, J. Phys. Chem., 91, 634, 10.1021/j100287a028 · DOI
  10. Albella, 2011, Nano Lett., 11, 3531, 10.1021/nl201783v · DOI
  11. Yang, 2014, ACS Photonics, 1, 582, 10.1021/ph500042v · DOI
  12. Wu, 2011, J. Phys. Chem. C, 115, 13571, 10.1021/jp201423r · DOI
  13. Watson, 2015, Nano Lett., 15, 1095, 10.1021/nl5040623 · DOI
  14. Alcaraz de la Osa, 2015, J. Phys. Chem. C, 119, 12572, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00983 · DOI
  15. Zhang, 2016, Nanoscale Horiz., 1, 75, 10.1039/C5NH00062A · DOI
  16. Pelton, 2008, Laser Photon. Rev, 2, 136, 10.1002/lpor.200810003 · DOI
  17. Kuzma, 2012, J. Appl. Phys, 112, 103531, 10.1063/1.4767688 · DOI
  18. Draine, 1994, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11, 1491, 10.1364/JOSAA.11.001491 · DOI
  19. Chan, 2008, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 13958, 10.1021/jp804088z · DOI
  20. Wu, 2007, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 25, 1019, 10.1116/1.2734163 · DOI
  21. Alonso-González, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 1
  22. Moreno, 2013, Langmuir, 29, 6715, 10.1021/la400703r · DOI
  23. Sharma, 2012, Mater. Today, 15, 16, 10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70017-2 · DOI
  24. Al-Kuhaili, 2003, Appl. Phys. Lett., 83, 4533, 10.1063/1.1630845 · DOI
  25. Jezequel, 1977, J. Phys. F, 7, 1613, 10.1088/0305-4608/7/8/028 · DOI
  26. Lalisse, 2015, J. Phys. Chem. C, 119, 25518, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09294 · DOI
  27. Liao, 1982, J. Chem. Phys, 76, 751, 10.1063/1.442690 · DOI
  28. Scherbak, 2014, Plasmonics, 10, 519, 10.1007/s11468-014-9836-7 · DOI
  29. Aroca, 2011, J. Phys. Chem. C, 115, 20419, 10.1021/jp205997u · DOI
  30. Rai, 2006, Combust. Theor. Model., 10, 843, 10.1080/13647830600800686 · DOI
  31. Fournier, 2002, Surf. Interface Anal., 34, 494, 10.1002/sia.1346 · DOI
  32. Blaber, 2012, Nano Lett., 12, 5275, 10.1021/nl3025104 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gutierrez, Y., Ortiz, D., Sanz, J. M., Saiz, J. M., Gonzalez, F., Everitt, H. O., & Moreno, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
  • Duke University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2016-08-29
Volume
24
Issue
18
Pages
20621
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1364/oe.24.020621
OpenAlex
W2518415957
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCrea (University of Cantabria) (acceptedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) (FIS2013-45854-P)
  • Universidad de Cantabria (UC)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Near-Field Optical Microscopy
Keywords
ultraviolet plasmonics, oxidation effects, aluminum nanostructures, core-shell nanoparticles, absorption efficiency, electromagnetic simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review