Cited by 101

Classification, identification, and growth stage estimation of microalgae based on transmission hyperspectral microscopic imaging and machine learning

Xu, Zhanpeng, Jiang, Yiming, Ji, Jiali, Forsberg, Erik, Li, Yuanpeng, He, Sailing·2020·Optics Express

Abstract

A transmission hyperspectral microscopic imager (THMI) that utilizes machine learning algorithms for hyperspectral detection of microalgae is presented. The THMI system has excellent performance with spatial and spectral resolutions of 4 µm and 3 nm, respectively. We performed hyperspectral imaging (HSI) of three species of microalgae to verify their absorption characteristics. Transmission spectra were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and peak ratio algorithms for dimensionality reduction and feature extraction, and a support vector machine (SVM) model was used for classification. The average accuracy, sensitivity and specificity to distinguish one species from the other two species were found to be 94.4%, 94.4% and 97.2%, respectively. A species identification experiment for a group of mixed microalgae in solution demonstrates the usability of the classification method. Using a random forest (RF) model, the growth stage in a phaeocystis growth cycle cultivated under laboratory conditions was predicted with an accuracy of 98.1%, indicating the feasibility to evaluate the growth state of microalgae through their transmission spectra. Experimental results show that the THMI system has the capability for classification, identification and growth stage estimation of microalgae, with strong potential for in-situ marine environmental monitoring and early warning detection applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.406036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Z., Jiang, Y., Ji, J., Forsberg, E., Li, Y., & He, S.
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2020-09-29
Volume
28
Issue
21
Pages
30686
ISSN
1094-4087
Cited by
101
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Zhejiang University NGICS Platform)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1407503)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61774131, 91833303)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review