Cited by 11Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactionsPhotonic and Optical Devices

Proposal for noise-free visible-telecom quantum frequency conversion through third-order sum and difference frequency generation

Open access
Lu, Xiyuan, Moille, Gregory, Rao, Ashutosh, Srinivasan, Kartik·2021·Optics Letters

Abstract

Quantum frequency conversion (QFC) between the visible and telecom is a key to connect quantum memories in fiber-based quantum networks. Current methods for linking such widely separated frequencies, such as sum/difference frequency generation and four-wave mixing Bragg scattering, are prone to broadband noise generated by the pump laser(s). To address this issue, we propose to use third-order sum/difference frequency generation (TSFG/TDFG) for an upconversion/downconversion QFC interface. In this process, two long wavelength pump photons combine their energy and momentum to mediate frequency conversion across the large spectral gap between the visible and telecom bands, which is particularly beneficial from the noise perspective. We show that waveguide-coupled silicon nitride microring resonators can be designed for efficient QFC between 606 and 1550 nm via a 1990 nm pump through TSFG/TDFG. We simulate the device dispersion and coupling, and from the simulated parameters, estimate that the frequency conversion can be efficient ( ) at 50 mW pump power. Our results suggest that microresonator TSFG/TDFG is promising for compact, scalable, and low-power QFC across large spectral gaps.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.412602

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four-wave mixing QFC between 980 and 1550 nm with on-chip efficiency ≈60% was recently shown in SiN microrings and constituted a wider spectral gap than previous fiber demonstrations; efficient low-noise visible-to-telecom QFC has been proposed using similar devices.

    “For example, four-wave mixing QFC between 980 and 1550 nm (on-chip efficiency ≈60%) was recently shown in SiN microrings [183] and constituted a wider spectral gap than previous demonstrations in optical fibers; efficient and low-noise visible-to-telecom QFC has also been proposed using similar devices [184].”

    From 2022 Roadmap on integrated quantum photonics (2022) · cites this paper as [184]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • 2022 Roadmap on integrated quantum photonics

    Moody, G., Sorger, V. J., Blumenthal, D. J., Juodawlkis, P. W., Loh, W., Sorace-Agaskar, C., Jones, A. E., Balram, K. C., Matthews, J. C. F., Laing, A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Physics: Photonics · doi:10.1088/2515-7647/ac1ef4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

    “For example, four-wave mixing QFC between 980 and 1550 nm (on-chip efficiency≈60%) was recently shown in SiN microrings [183] and constituted a wider spectral gap than previous demonstrations in optical fibers; efficient and low-noise visible-to-telecom QFC has also been proposed using similar devices [184].”
    MethodSelf-citation

Authors
Lu, X., Moille, G., Rao, A., & Srinivasan, K.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Srinivasan, Kartik
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2021-01-05
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
222
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
OpenAlex
W3093202255
Cited by
11
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST-on-a-chip, 70NANB10H193)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (LUMOS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
Keywords
quantum frequency conversion, silicon nitride microring resonator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review