Cited by 23Mechanical and Optical ResonatorsPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchOptical Coatings and Gratings

Thermal noise and mechanical loss of SiO2/Ta2O5 optical coatings at cryogenic temperatures

Open access
Robinson, John M., Oelker, Eric, Milner, William R., Kedar, Dhruv, Zhang, Wei, Legero, Thomas, Matei, Dan G., Häfner, Sebastian +3 more·2021·Optics Letters

Abstract

Mechanical loss of dielectric mirror coatings sets fundamental limits for both gravitational wave detectors and cavity-stabilized optical local oscillators for atomic clocks. Two approaches are used to determine the mechanical loss: ringdown measurements of the coating quality factor and direct measurement of the coating thermal noise. Here we report a systematic study of the mirror thermal noise at 4, 16, 124, and 300 K by operating reference cavities at these temperatures. The directly measured thermal noise is used to extract the mechanical loss for S i O 2 / T a 2 O 5 coatings, which are compared with previously reported values.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.413758

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Silicon dioxide (SiO2) is the most commonly used material to fabricate dielectric mirrors.

    “The most commonly used material to fabricate dielectric mirrors is silicon dioxide (SiO2).”

    From Metal Oxide Thin Films for Advanced Photonic Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The introduction (p. 1) says SiO2 and Ta2O5 are the most common choices for the low- and high-refractive-index layers of highly reflective optical coatings, respectively. This supports SiO2 as a common mirror-coating material, but not the claim that it alone is the most commonly used material for dielectric mirrors. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The SiO2/TiO2 pair offers the largest optical contrast, making it suitable for high-reflectance dielectric mirrors with a smaller number of pairs and sharper stopbands.

    “However, the pair SiO2/TiO2 offers the largest optical contrast, rendering it perfect for high-reflectance dielectric mirrors with a smaller number of pairs and sharper stopbands.”

    From Metal Oxide Thin Films for Advanced Photonic Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The introduction (p. 1) says highly reflective coatings stack materials with high and low refractive indices, but identifies SiO2/Ta2O5—not SiO2/TiO2—as the common pair. Searches for SiO2/TiO2, optical contrast, pair count, and stopbands found no passage assessing the claimed advantages of SiO2/TiO2. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [18]18. M. D. Swallows, M. J. Martin, M. Bishof, C. Benko, Y. Lin, S. Blatt, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, IEEE Transactions on Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 59 , 416 (2012).
  2. [21]21. R. Nawrodt, A. Zimmer, T. Koettig, C. Schwarz, D. Heinert, M. Hudl, R. Neubert, M. Thürk, S. Nietzsche, W. Vodel, P . Seidel, and A. Tünnermann, J. Physics: Conf. Ser. 122 , 012008 (2008).
  3. [25]25. P. Klocek, Handbook of infrared optical materials (CRC Press, 1991).
  4. [28]28. A. Amato, G. Cagnoli, M. Canepa, E. Coillet, J. Degallaix, V. Dolique, D. Forest, M. Granata, V. Martinez, C. Michel, L. Pinard, B. Sassolas, and J. Teillon, J. Physics: Conf. Ser. 957 , 012006 (2018).
  5. [33]33. R. Robie, 'Characterisation of the mechanical properties of thin-film mirror coating materials for use in future interferometric gravitational wave detectors,' Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow (2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, J. M., Oelker, E., Milner, W. R., Kedar, D., Zhang, W., Legero, T., Matei, D. G., Häfner, S., Riehle, F., Sterr, U., & Ye, J.
Affiliations
  • Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics (US)
  • Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
592
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
OpenAlex
W3101593409
Cited by
23
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (QLCI 2016244)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • PTB
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC-2123 Quantum Frontiers)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Optical Coatings and Gratings
Keywords
thermal noise, mechanical losses, dielectric mirror coatings, cryogenic temperatures, quality factor, ringdown, reference cavity, gravitational wave detectors, optical local oscillator, atomic clocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review