Cited by 134Photonic Crystals and ApplicationsMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics

Doubly resonant χ (2) nonlinear photonic crystal cavity based on a bound state in the continuum

Open access
Minkov, Momchil, Gerace, Dario, Fan, Shanhui·2019·Optica

Abstract

Photonic nanostructures simultaneously maximizing spectral and spatial overlap between fundamental and second-harmonic confined modes are highly desirable for enhancing second-order nonlinear effects in nonlinear media. These conditions have thus far remained challenging to satisfy in photonic crystal cavities because of the difficulty in designing a band gap at the second-harmonic frequency. Here, we solve this issue by using instead a bound state in the continuum at that frequency, and we design a doubly-resonant photonic crystal slab cavity with strongly improved figures of merit for nonlinear frequency conversion when compared to previous photonic crystal designs. Furthermore, we show that the far-field emission at both frequencies is highly collimated around normal incidence, which allows for simultaneously efficient pump excitation and collection of the generated nonlinear signal. Our results could lead to unprecedented conversion efficiencies in both parametric down conversion and second harmonic generation in an extremely compact architecture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.6.001039

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A normalized conversion efficiency of 1160%/W·cm^2 was achieved in a 5 mm SiNx loaded waveguide on PPLN by engineering the cross section to limit leakage.

    “In the former case, high normalized conversion efficiency of 1160%/W•cm 2 was achieved in a 5 mm SiN x loaded waveguide on PPLN through engineering the waveguide cross section to limit leakage of the fundamental TE mode to TM slab modes [322].”

    From Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate (2021) · cites this paper as [322]

  • Ultrahigh normalized conversion efficiencies have been achieved in SiNx loaded waveguides and monolithic LN ridge waveguides via type-0 QPM.

    “To date, ultrahigh normalized conversion efficiencies have been achieved in both SiN x loaded waveguides and monolithic LN ridge waveguides via type-0 quasi-phase matching.”

    From Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate (2021) · cites this paper as [322]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [7]M. Liscidini and L. C. Andreani, Physical Review E 73 , 016613 (2006).
  2. [11]A. W. Bruch, X. Liu, X. Guo, J. B. Surya, Z. Gong, L. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Yan, and H. X. Tang, Applied Physics Letters 113 , 131102 (2018).
  3. [13]Z. Lin, M. Lonˇ car, and A. W. Rodriguez, Opt. Express 42 , 2818 (2017), arXiv:1701.05628. · arXiv
  4. [27]M. Minkov and V. Savona, Proc. SPIE 9127 , 91270C (2014).
  5. [31]D. Gerace and V. Savona, Physical Review A 89 , 031803 (2014).
  6. [37]E. Estephan, C. Larroque, F. J. Cuisinier, Z. B´ alint, and C. Gergely, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 112 , 8799 (2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minkov, M., Gerace, D., & Fan, S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Venue
Optica
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
1039
ISSN
2334-2536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965904245
Cited by
134
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optica (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) (FA9550-17-1-0002)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) (P300P2_177721)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020) (QuantERA ERA-NET Cofund in Quantum Technologies project CUSPIDOR)
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Keywords
bound states in the continuum, photonic crystal cavities, second harmonic generation, second-order nonlinear optics, parametric down-conversion, doubly resonant cavity, photonic crystal slabs, nonlinear frequency conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review