Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Agitation Modules: Flexible Means to Accelerate Automated Freeze Substitution

Reipert, Siegfried, Goldammer, Helmuth, Richardson, Christine, Goldberg, Martin W., Hawkins, Timothy J., Hollergschwandtner, Elena, Kaufmann, Walter A., Antreich, Sebastian, Stierhof, York-Dieter·2018·Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

Abstract

For ultrafast fixation of biological samples to avoid artifacts, high-pressure freezing (HPF) followed by freeze substitution (FS) is preferred over chemical fixation at room temperature. After HPF, samples are maintained at low temperature during dehydration and fixation, while avoiding damaging recrystallization. This is a notoriously slow process. McDonald and Webb demonstrated, in 2011, that sample agitation during FS dramatically reduces the necessary time. Then, in 2015, we (H.G. and S.R.) introduced an agitation module into the cryochamber of an automated FS unit and demonstrated that the preparation of algae could be shortened from days to a couple of hours. We argued that variability in the processing, reproducibility, and safety issues are better addressed using automated FS units. For dissemination, we started low-cost manufacturing of agitation modules for two of the most widely used FS units, the Automatic Freeze Substitution Systems, AFS(1) and AFS2, from Leica Microsystems, using three dimensional (3D)-printing of the major components. To test them, several labs independently used the modules on a wide variety of specimens that had previously been processed by manual agitation, or without agitation. We demonstrate that automated processing with sample agitation saves time, increases flexibility with respect to sample requirements and protocols, and produces data of at least as good quality as other approaches.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1369/0022155418786698

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1007/978-3-642-72815-0_7 · DOI
  2. Humbel BM, 1989, Immuno-gold labeling in cell biology
  3. Humbel BM. Freeze substitution. In: Cavalier A, Spehner D, Humbel BM, editors. Hand book of cryo-preparation methods for electron microscopy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. p. 319–41.
  4. Cavalier A, Spehner D, Humbel BM. Handbook of cryo-preparation methods for electron microscopy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. · DOI
  5. 10.1002/jemt.1098 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0968-4328(01)00037-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01237.x · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01767.x · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S1431927613004790 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S143192761005765X · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03526.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bobik K, 2014, J Vis Exp, 92, e51844
  13. 10.1083/jcb.201405081 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/ismej.2015.253 · DOI
  15. 10.1091/mbc.e16-02-0099 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S1431927613008702 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.protis.2016.06.002 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6352-2_15 · DOI
  19. Kaech A., 2009, Handbook of cryo-preparation methods for electron microscopy
  20. 10.1083/jcb.25.2.407 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01122-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nprot.2014.099 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Siksou L, Rostaing P, Lechaire JP, Boudier T, Ohtsuka T, Fejtová A, Kao HT, Greengard P, Gundelfinger ED, Triller A, Marty S. Three-dimensional architecture of presynaptic terminal cytomatrix. J Neurosci. 2007;27(26):6868–77. · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0091-679X(10)96020-2 · DOI
  25. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01064.x · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.01984.x · DOI
  27. 10.1104/pp.82.3.787 · DOI
  28. 10.1105/tpc.007773 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04388.x · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00063-5 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.08.006 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00182.x · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086383 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0165-0270(97)00061-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s00709-013-0575-y · DOI
  36. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000749 · DOI
  37. 10.1104/pp.010517 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/jxb/ert151 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/aob/mcu042 · DOI
  40. 10.3389/fpls.2015.01018 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.12.003 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/jemt.20451 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/jemt.20371 · DOI
  44. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020187 · DOI
  45. 10.1042/BJ20121259 · DOI
  46. MacKay EM, 1932, J Biol Chem, 96, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)76276-5 · DOI
  47. Brittain T, 1978, Biochim Biophys Acta, 543
  48. 10.1007/s00421-015-3175-z · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1985.tb02658.x · DOI
  50. Humbel B, 1985, The science of biological specimen preparation
  51. 10.1017/S1431927613013846 · DOI
  52. 10.7717/peerj.3923 · DOI
  53. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01238.x · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.09.002 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41396-018-0069-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Reipert, S., Goldammer, H., Richardson, C., Goldberg, M. W., Hawkins, T. J., Hollergschwandtner, E., Kaufmann, W. A., Antreich, S., & Stierhof, Y.-D.
Affiliations
  • Core Facility Cell Imaging and Ultrastructure Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
  • Electron Microscopy Facility, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
  • Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), Microscopy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Venue
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
Published
2018-07-03
Volume
66
Issue
12
Pages
903-921
ISSN
  • 0022-1554
  • 1551-5044
Cited by
25
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1101)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK (BB/G011818/1, BB/E015735/1)
  • Austria Wirtschaftsservice (P1404884)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agitation Modules: Flexible Means to Accelerate Automated Freeze Substitution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1369/0022155418786698
The paper
Reipert, S., Goldammer, H., Richardson, C., Goldberg, M. W., Hawkins, T. J., Hollergschwandtner, E., Kaufmann, W. A., Antreich, S., & Stierhof, Y.-D. (2018). Agitation Modules: Flexible Means to Accelerate Automated Freeze Substitution. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155418786698