The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physician-Patient Relationship and Medication Compliance: A Primary Care Investigation
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: We assessed the relationship between 4 attributes of the physician-patient relationship and medication compliance. METHODS: We conducted a waiting room survey of patients consulting 22 general practitioners in 14 randomly selected practices in Auckland, New Zealand (81% response rate). A total of 370 consecutive patients (75% response rate) completed survey instruments about 4 attributes of the physician-patient relationship. Continuity of care (assessed from use of a usual physician, length of continuity, and perceived importance of continuity) and trust in the physician were ascertained before the consultation. After the consultation the Patient Enablement Index measured the physician's ability to enable patients in self-care, and concordance between the patient and physician was measured by a 6-item inventory of perceived agreement about the presenting problem and management, were ascertained immediately after the consultation. Compliance with prescribed medication therapy was ascertained by telephone follow-up 4 days after the consultation. RESULTS: Overall, 220 patients (61%) received a prescription, and 79% of these patients were taking the medication at follow-up. In a univariate analysis adjusted for clustering, only trust and physician-patient concordance were significantly related to compliance. In analysis further adjusted for health and demographic factors, physician-patient concordance was independently related to compliance (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Primary care consultations with higher levels of patient-reported physician-patient concordance were associated with one-third greater medication compliance. An emphasis on understanding and facilitating agreement between physician and patient may benefit outcomes in primary care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
Anderson, L. A., & Dedrick, R. F. (1990) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091 · Cited by 923
Defining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care
Saultz, J. W. (2003) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.23 · Cited by 588
Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, And Policy
Bárbara (1992) · Cited by 501
Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction.
Hjortdahl, P., & Laerum, E. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6837.1287 · Cited by 405
Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy
Reader, G. G., & Starfield, B. (1993) · Journal of Public Health Policy · doi:10.2307/3342881 · Cited by 398
The Role of Provider Continuity in Preventing Hospitalizations
Gill, J. M. (1998) · Archives of Family Medicine · doi:10.1001/archfami.7.4.352 · Cited by 384
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 382
Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey
Howie, J. G. R., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., Walker, J. J., Freeman, G. K., & Rai, H. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.738 · Cited by 362
Communicating with Medical Patients
(1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-3-259_4 · Cited by 343
Cited by
Polonsky, W., & Henry, R. (2016) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s106821 · Cited by 784
“In a conceptually similar vein, Kerse et al 61 found that primary care patients’ sense of “concordance” with their physician (feeling that their needs during medical visits had been heard and addressed) predicted medication adherence over time.”
The association between continuity of care and outcomes: a systematic and critical review
Van Walraven, C., Oake, N., Jennings, A., & Forster, A. J. (2010) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01235.x · Cited by 644
Effects of perceived racism, cultural mistrust and trust in providers on satisfaction with care.
(2006) · PubMed Central · Cited by 278
Albus, C., Waller, C., Fritzsche, K., Gunold, H., Haass, M., Hamann, B., Kindermann, I., Köllner, V., Leithäuser, B., Marx, N., et al. (2019) · Clinical Research in Cardiology · doi:10.1007/s00392-019-01488-w · Cited by 178
Ho, S. C., Jacob, S. A., & Tangiisuran, B. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179290 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerse, N.
- Venue
- The Annals of Family Medicine
- Publisher
- Annals of Family Medicine
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 455-461
- ISSN
- 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-1717
- OpenAlex
- W2150236945
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physician-Patient Relationship and Medication Compliance: A Primary Care Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1370/afm.139
- The paper
- Kerse, N. (2004). Physician-Patient Relationship and Medication Compliance: A Primary Care Investigation. The Annals of Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.