The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In an effort to learn more about the importance of continuity of care to physicians and patients, I reviewed the medical literature on continuity of care to define interpersonal continuity and describe how it has been measured and studied. METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE database from 1966 through April 2002 was conducted to find articles focusing on the keyword "continuity of patient care," including all subheadings. Titles and abstracts of the resulting articles were screened to select articles focusing on interpersonal continuity in the physician-patient relationship or on the definition of continuity of care. These articles were systematically reviewed and analyzed for study method, measurement technique, and research theme. RESULTS: A total of 379 original articles were found that addressed any aspect of continuity as an attribute of general medical care. One hundred forty-two articles directly related to the definition of continuity or to the concept of interpersonal continuity in the physician-patient relationship. Although the available literature reflects little agreement on how to define continuity of care, it is best defined as a hierarchy of 3 dimensions; informational, longitudinal, and interpersonal continuity. Interpersonal continuity is of particular interest for primary care. Twenty-one measurement techniques have been defined to study continuity, many of which relate to visit patterns and concentration rather than the interpersonal nature of the continuity relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Future inquiry in family medicine should focus on better understanding the interpersonal dimension of continuity of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Quantitative Measure of Continuity of Care
Bice, T. W., & Boxerman, S. B. (1977) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-197704000-00010 · Cited by 529
The Effects of Having a Regular Doctor on Access to Primary Care
LAMBREW, J. M., DEFRIESE, G. H., CAREY, T. S., RICKETTS, T. C., & BIDDLE, A. K. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199602000-00006 · Cited by 274
Rowley, M. J., Hensley, M. J., Brinsmead, M. W., & Wlodarczyk, J. H. (1995) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124592.x · Cited by 183
Cited by
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A., & Devane, D. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub5 · Cited by 906
The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions
Kringos, D. S., Boerma, W. G., Hutchinson, A., van der Zee, J., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-65 · Cited by 720
Midwife‐led versus other models of care for childbearing women
Hatem, M., Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H., & Gates, S. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub2 · Cited by 621
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A., & Devane, D. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub4 · Cited by 514
Physician-Patient Relationship and Medication Compliance: A Primary Care Investigation
Kerse, N. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.139 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Saultz, J. W.
- Venue
- The Annals of Family Medicine
- Publisher
- Annals of Family Medicine
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 134-143
- ISSN
- 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-1717
- OpenAlex
- W2135400505
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1370/afm.23
- The paper
- Saultz, J. W. (2003). Defining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care. The Annals of Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.