Cited by 465Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits

Open access
Powell, Rhea E., Henstenburg, Jeffrey M., Cooper, Grace, Hollander, Judd E., Rising, Kristin L.·2017·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: Telehealth is a care delivery model that promises to increase the flexibility and reach of health services. Our objective is to describe patient experiences with video visits performed with their established primary care clinicians. METHODS: We constructed semistructured, in-depth qualitative interviews with adult patients following video visits with their primary care clinicians at a single academic medical center. Data were analyzed with a content analysis approach. RESULTS: Of 32 eligible patients, 19 were successfully interviewed. All patients reported overall satisfaction with video visits, with the majority interested in continuing to use video visits as an alternative to in-person visits. The primary benefits cited were convenience and decreased costs. Some patients felt more comfortable with video visits than office visits and expressed a preference for receiving future serious news via video visit, because they could be in their own supportive environment. Primary concerns with video visits were privacy, including the potential for work colleagues to overhear conversations, and questions about the ability of the clinician to perform an adequate physical examination. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care video visits are acceptable in a variety of situations. Patients identified convenience, efficiency, communication, privacy, and comfort as domains that are potentially important to consider when assessing video visits vs in-person encounters. Future studies should explore which patients and conditions are best suited for video visits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.2095

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, R. E., Henstenburg, J. M., Cooper, G., Hollander, J. E., & Rising, K. L.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2017-05
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
225-229
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2411813461
Cited by
465
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
FWCI
24.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
telemedicine, video consultation, primary care, patient satisfaction, patient perspectives, convenience, cost reduction, privacy concerns, physical examination limitations, in-person visits, patient-clinician communication
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Confidentiality, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Perception, Primary Health Care, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review