Cited by 274Primary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare Systems and Technology

The Effects of Having a Regular Doctor on Access to Primary Care

LAMBREW, JEANNE M., DEFRIESE, GORDON H., CAREY, TIMOTHY S., RICKETTS, THOMAS C., BIDDLE, ANDREA K.·1996·Medical Care

Abstract

The authors assessed the relationship between having a regular doctor and access to care, as measured by a set of preventive and primary care utilization indicators recommended by the Institute of Medicine. The 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey was used in the analyses (n = 30,012). The results of the regression analyses suggest that individuals with any type of regular source of care had better access than those without a regular source of care. Persons with a regular doctor had better access to primary care than those with a regular site but no regular doctor. However, the apparent advantage of having a regular doctor over a regular site disappeared when only those individuals reporting a physician's office, clinic, or health maintenance organization as their regular source of care were compared. These results suggest that policies that promote the doctor-patient relationship will increase access, although the gains may be negligible for individuals who use mainstream primary care sites (physician's office, clinic, or health maintenance organization) versus sites such as walk-in clinics or emergency rooms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-199602000-00006

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LAMBREW, J. M., DEFRIESE, G. H., CAREY, T. S., RICKETTS, T. C., & BIDDLE, A. K.
Affiliations
United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Venue
Medical Care
Published
1996-02
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
138-151
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968248796
Cited by
274
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
26.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
primary care access, preventive care utilization, primary care utilization, physician-patient relationship, health maintenance organizations, physician offices, walk-in clinics, emergency department utilization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Maintenance Organizations, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Regression Analysis, United States, National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review