The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular-Level Variation Affects Population Growth in a Butterfly Metapopulation
Open accessAbstract
The dynamics of natural populations are thought to be dominated by demographic and environmental processes with little influence of intraspecific genetic variation and natural selection, apart from inbreeding depression possibly reducing population growth in small populations. Here we analyse hundreds of well-characterised local populations in a large metapopulation of the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia), which persists in a balance between stochastic local extinctions and recolonisations in a network of 4,000 discrete habitat patches. We show that the allelic composition of the glycolytic enzyme phosphoglucose isomerase (Pgi) has a significant effect on the growth of local populations, consistent with previously reported effects of allelic variation on flight metabolic performance and fecundity in the Glanville fritillary and Colias butterflies. The strength and the sign of the molecular effect on population growth are sensitive to the ecological context (the area and spatial connectivity of the habitat patches), which affects genotype-specific gene flow and the influence of migration on the dynamics of local populations. The biological significance of the results for Pgi is underscored by lack of any association between population growth and allelic variation at six other loci typed in the same material. In demonstrating, to our knowledge for the first time, that molecular variation in a candidate gene affects population growth, this study challenges the perception that differential performance of individual genotypes, leading to differential fitness, is irrelevant to population dynamics. These results also demonstrate that the spatial configuration of habitat and spatial dynamics of populations contribute to maintenance of Pgi polymorphism in this species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clobert, J., Le Galliard, J., Cote, J., Meylan, S., & Massot, M. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01267.x · Cited by 1,232
Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses
GIENAPP, P., TEPLITSKY, C., ALHO, J. S., MILLS, J. A., & MERILÄ, J. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03413.x · Cited by 1,256
Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing
VERA, J. C., WHEAT, C. W., FESCEMYER, H. W., FRILANDER, M. J., CRAWFORD, D. L., HANSKI, I., & MARDEN, J. H. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03666.x · Cited by 714
Self-citationConservation genetics of population bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection, and history
Bouzat, J. L. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0049-0 · Cited by 289
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanski, I., & Saccheri, I.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006-04-25
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e129
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2007043424
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular-Level Variation Affects Population Growth in a Butterfly Metapopulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040129
- The paper
- Hanski, I., & Saccheri, I. (2006). Molecular-Level Variation Affects Population Growth in a Butterfly Metapopulation. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.