The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles of Genome Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group
Open accessAbstract
That closely related species often differ by chromosomal inversions was discovered by Sturtevant and Plunkett in 1926. Our knowledge of how these inversions originate is still very limited, although a prevailing view is that they are facilitated by ectopic recombination events between inverted repetitive sequences. The availability of genome sequences of related species now allows us to study in detail the mechanisms that generate interspecific inversions. We have analyzed the breakpoint regions of the 29 inversions that differentiate the chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster and two closely related species, D. simulans and D. yakuba, and reconstructed the molecular events that underlie their origin. Experimental and computational analysis revealed that the breakpoint regions of 59% of the inversions (17/29) are associated with inverted duplications of genes or other nonrepetitive sequences. In only two cases do we find evidence for inverted repetitive sequences in inversion breakpoints. We propose that the presence of inverted duplications associated with inversion breakpoint regions is the result of staggered breaks, either isochromatid or chromatid, and that this, rather than ectopic exchange between inverted repetitive sequences, is the prevalent mechanism for the generation of inversions in the melanogaster species group. Outgroup analysis also revealed evidence for widespread breakpoint recycling. Lastly, we have found that expression domains in D. melanogaster may be disrupted in D. yakuba, bringing into question their potential adaptive significance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457
Speciation Within Anopheles gambiae -- the Glass Is Half Full
della Torre, A., Costantini, C., Besansky, N. J., Caccone, A., Petrarca, V., Powell, J. R., & Coluzzi, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1078170 · Cited by 229 · cited 1×
“divergence [31,32].”
Bourque, G., Zdobnov, E. M., Bork, P., Pevzner, P. A., & Tesler, G. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3002305 · Cited by 162
Highly variable rates of genome rearrangements between hemiascomycetous yeast lineages
Fischer, G., Rocha, E. P. C., Brunet, F., Vergassola, M., & Dujon, B. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020032 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change
Hu, T. T., Pattyn, P., Bakker, E. G., Cao, J., Cheng, J.-F., Clark, R. M., Fahlgren, N., Fawcett, J. A., Grimwood, J., Gundlach, H., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.807 · Cited by 872
Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution
Simakov, O., Marlétaz, F., Yue, J.-X., O’Connell, B., Jenkins, J., Brandt, A., Calef, R., Tung, C.-H., Huang, T.-K., Schmutz, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1156-z · Cited by 363
Molecular, genetic and evolutionary analysis of a paracentric inversion in Arabidopsis thaliana
Fransz, P., Linc, G., Lee, C., Aflitos, S. A., Lasky, J. R., Toomajian, C., Ali, H., Peters, J., van Dam, P., Ji, X., et al. (2016) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13262 · Cited by 94
Miller, D. E., Kahsai, L., Buddika, K., Dixon, M. J., Kim, B. Y., Calvi, B. R., Sokol, N. S., Hawley, R. S., & Cook, K. R. (2020) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.120.401559 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranz, J. M., Maurin, D., Chan, Y. S., von Grotthuss, M., Hillier, L. W., Roote, J., Ashburner, M., & Bergman, C. M.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-06-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e152
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2090002702
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Genome Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050152
- The paper
- Ranz, J. M., Maurin, D., Chan, Y. S., von Grotthuss, M., Hillier, L. W., Roote, J., Ashburner, M., & Bergman, C. M. (2007). Principles of Genome Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.