The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Invasive Mutualists Erode Native Pollination Webs
Open accessAbstract
Plant-animal mutualisms are characterized by weak or asymmetric mutual dependences between interacting species, a feature that could increase community stability. If invasive species integrate into mutualistic webs, they may alter web structure, with consequences for species persistence. However, the effect of alien mutualists on the architecture of plant-pollinator webs remains largely unexplored. We analyzed the extent of mutual dependency between interacting species, as a measure of mutualism strength, and the connectivity of 10 paired plant-pollinator webs, eight from forests of the southern Andes and two from oceanic islands, with different incidences of alien species. Highly invaded webs exhibited weaker mutualism than less-invaded webs. This potential increase in network stability was the result of a disproportionate increase in the importance and participation of alien species in the most asymmetric interactions. The integration of alien mutualists did not alter overall network connectivity, but links were transferred from generalist native species to super-generalist alien species during invasion. Therefore, connectivity among native species declined in highly invaded webs. These modifications in the structure of pollination webs, due to dominance of alien mutualists, can leave many native species subject to novel ecological and evolutionary dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., & Jordano, P. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x · Cited by 599
Cited by
Review: Ecological networks – beyond food webs
Ings, T. C., Montoya, J. M., Bascompte, J., Blüthgen, N., Brown, L., Dormann, C. F., Edwards, F., Figueroa, D., Jacob, U., Jones, J. I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01460.x · Cited by 934
Schweiger, O., Biesmeijer, J. C., Bommarco, R., Hickler, T., Hulme, P. E., Klotz, S., Kühn, I., Moora, M., Nielsen, A., Ohlemüller, R., et al. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00125.x · Cited by 431
Diversity, threats and conservation of native bees in the Neotropics
Freitas, B. M., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L., Medina, L. M., Kleinert, A. D. M. P., Galetto, L., Nates-Parra, G., & Quezada-Euán, J. J. G. (2009) · Apidologie · doi:10.1051/apido/2009012 · Cited by 355
Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks
Guimarães Jr, P. R., Jordano, P., & Thompson, J. N. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01649.x · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Aizen, M. A., Morales, C. L., & Morales, J. M.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-02-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e31
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2039755861
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invasive Mutualists Erode Native Pollination Webs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060031
- The paper
- Aizen, M. A., Morales, C. L., & Morales, J. M. (2008). Invasive Mutualists Erode Native Pollination Webs. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.