The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct Estimation of the Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Rate in Drosophila melanogaster
Open accessAbstract
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variants are widely used in evolutionary genetics as markers for population history and to estimate divergence times among taxa. Inferences of species history are generally based on phylogenetic comparisons, which assume that molecular evolution is clock-like. Between-species comparisons have also been used to estimate the mutation rate, using sites that are thought to evolve neutrally. We directly estimated the mtDNA mutation rate by scanning the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila melanogaster lines that had undergone approximately 200 generations of spontaneous mutation accumulation (MA). We detected a total of 28 point mutations and eight insertion-deletion (indel) mutations, yielding an estimate for the single-nucleotide mutation rate of 6.2 x 10(-8) per site per fly generation. Most mutations were heteroplasmic within a line, and their frequency distribution suggests that the effective number of mitochondrial genomes transmitted per female per generation is about 30. We observed repeated occurrences of some indel mutations, suggesting that indel mutational hotspots are common. Among the point mutations, there is a large excess of G-->A mutations on the major strand (the sense strand for the majority of mitochondrial genes). These mutations tend to occur at nonsynonymous sites of protein-coding genes, and they are expected to be deleterious, so do not become fixed between species. The overall mtDNA mutation rate per base pair per fly generation in Drosophila is estimated to be about 10x higher than the nuclear mutation rate, but the mitochondrial major strand G-->A mutation rate is about 70x higher than the nuclear rate. Silent sites are substantially more strongly biased towards A and T than nonsynonymous sites, consistent with the extreme mutation bias towards A+T. Strand-asymmetric mutation bias, coupled with selection to maintain specific nonsynonymous bases, therefore provides an explanation for the extreme base composition of the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors
Margulies, M., Egholm, M., Altman, W. E., Attiya, S., Bader, J. S., Bemben, L. A., Berka, J., Braverman, M. S., Chen, Y.-J., Chen, Z., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03959 · Cited by 7,693
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1979) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1179-98 · Cited by 7,666
Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution
Avise, J. C. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2381-9 · Cited by 5,242
The incomplete natural history of mitochondria
Ballard, J. W. O., & Whitlock, M. C. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.02063.x · Cited by 2,289
Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human disease
Taylor, R. W., & Turnbull, D. M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1606 · Cited by 1,852
A Sequencing Method Based on Real-Time Pyrophosphate
Ronaghi, M., Uhlén, M., & Nyrén, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5375.363 · Cited by 1,630
Mathematical Population Genetics
Baake, E., Ewens, W. J., & Wakolbinger, A. (2006) · Oberwolfach Reports · doi:10.4171/owr/2005/40 · Cited by 1,624
Time Dependency of Molecular Rate Estimates and Systematic Overestimation of Recent Divergence Times
Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., Cooper, A., & Drummond, A. J. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi145 · Cited by 1,057
Cited by
Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing
Schmitt, M. W., Kennedy, S. R., Salk, J. J., Fox, E. J., Hiatt, J. B., & Loeb, L. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208715109 · Cited by 1,047
Molecular Poltergeists: Mitochondrial DNA Copies (numts) in Sequenced Nuclear Genomes
Hazkani-Covo, E., Zeller, R. M., & Martin, W. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000834 · Cited by 629
Keightley, P. D., Trivedi, U., Thomson, M., Oliver, F., Kumar, S., & Blaxter, M. L. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.091231.109 · Cited by 357
Self-citationMeiklejohn, C. D., Holmbeck, M. A., Siddiq, M. A., Abt, D. N., Rand, D. M., & Montooth, K. L. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003238 · Cited by 259
Oxidative stress is not a major contributor to somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations
Itsara, L. S., Kennedy, S. R., Fox, E. J., Yu, S., Hewitt, J. J., Sanchez-Contreras, M., Cardozo-Pelaez, F., & Pallanck, L. J. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003974 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Haag-Liautard, C., Coffey, N., Houle, D., Lynch, M., Charlesworth, B., & Keightley, P. D.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-08-19
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e204
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2147322476
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct Estimation of the Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Rate in Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060204
- The paper
- Haag-Liautard, C., Coffey, N., Houle, D., Lynch, M., Charlesworth, B., & Keightley, P. D. (2008). Direct Estimation of the Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Rate in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.