Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Predominantly Neolithic Origin for European Paternal Lineages

Balaresque, Patricia, Bowden, Georgina R., Adams, Susan M., Leung, Ho-Yee, King, Turi E., Rosser, Zoë H., Goodwin, Jane, Moisan, Jean-Paul, Richard, Christelle, Millward, Ann, Demaine, Andrew G., Barbujani, Guido, Previderè, Carlo, Wilson, Ian J., Tyler-Smith, Chris, Jobling, Mark A.·2010·PLoS Biology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000285

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Maps showing dates of the spread of early farming in Europe, and the frequency and microsatellite variance of haplogroup R1b1b2. (A) Isochron map representing dates of early Neolithic sites in Europe, based on data of Pinhasi et al. (2005) [3]. KYBP, thousand years before present. (B) Geographical distribution of haplogroup frequency of hgR1b1b2, shown as an interpolated spatial frequency surface. Filled circles indicate populations for which microsatellite data and TMRCA estimates are available. Unfilled circles indicate populations included to illustrate R1b1b2 frequency only. Population codes are defined in Table 1. (C) Geographical distribution of mean microsatellite variance within hgR1b1b2, shown as an interpolated spatial frequency surface. Samples shown are those used for the calculation of variance only.
Figure 1 Maps showing dates of the spread of early farming in Europe, and the frequency and microsatellite variance of haplogroup R1b1b2. (A) Isochron map representing dates of early Neolithic sites in Europe, based on data of Pinhasi et al. (2005) [3]. KYBP, thousand years before present. (B) Geographical distribution of haplogroup frequency of hgR1b1b2, shown as an interpolated spatial frequency surface. Filled circles indicate populations for which microsatellite data and TMRCA estimates are available. Unfilled circles indicate populations included to illustrate R1b1b2 frequency only. Population codes are defined in Table 1. (C) Geographical distribution of mean microsatellite variance within hgR1b1b2, shown as an interpolated spatial frequency surface. Samples shown are those used for the calculation of variance only.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Relationship of diversity among 840 R1b1b2 chromosomes with (A) longitude and (B) latitude. Population codes are defined in Table 1.
Figure 2 Relationship of diversity among 840 R1b1b2 chromosomes with (A) longitude and (B) latitude. Population codes are defined in Table 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Reduced median network of microsatellite haplotypes within haplogroup R1b1b2. Molecular relationships between the nine-locus microsatellite haplotypes of 849 hgR1b1b2 chromosomes, including seven Serbian and two Greek haplotypes not included in the other analyses because population sample sizes were too small. Circles represent haplotypes, with area proportional to frequency and coloured according to population. Lines between circles represent microsatellite mutational steps.
Figure 3 Reduced median network of microsatellite haplotypes within haplogroup R1b1b2. Molecular relationships between the nine-locus microsatellite haplotypes of 849 hgR1b1b2 chromosomes, including seven Serbian and two Greek haplotypes not included in the other analyses because population sample sizes were too small. Circles represent haplotypes, with area proportional to frequency and coloured according to population. Lines between circles represent microsatellite mutational steps.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Correlation of dates of Neolithic sites with hgR1b1b2 (A) frequency and (B) variance. Population codes are defined in Table 1. YBP, years before present.
Figure 4 Correlation of dates of Neolithic sites with hgR1b1b2 (A) frequency and (B) variance. Population codes are defined in Table 1. YBP, years before present.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. P Menozzi, 1978, Synthetic maps of human gene frequencies in Europeans., Science, 201, 786, 10.1126/science.356262 · DOI
  2. R Pinhasi, 2005, Tracing the origin and spread of agriculture in Europe., PLoS Biol, 3, e410, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030410 · DOI
  3. L Chikhi, 1998, Clines of nuclear DNA markers suggest a largely neolithic ancestry of the European gene pool., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, 9053, 10.1073/pnas.95.15.9053 · DOI
  4. E. M Belle, 2006, Origins and evolution of the Europeans' genome: evidence from multiple microsatellite loci., Proc Biol Sci, 273, 1595, 10.1098/rspb.2006.3494 · DOI
  5. Z. H Rosser, 2000, Y-chromosomal diversity within Europe is clinal and influenced primarily by geography, rather than by language., Am J Hum Genet, 67, 1526, 10.1086/316890 · DOI
  6. O Semino, 2000, The genetic legacy of Paleolithic Homo sapiens sapiens in extant Europeans: a Y chromosome perspective., Science, 290, 1155, 10.1126/science.290.5494.1155 · DOI
  7. M Richards, 1996, Paleolithic and neolithic lineages in the European mitochondrial gene pool., Am J Hum Genet, 59, 185
  8. J Novembre, 2008, Interpreting principal component analyses of spatial population genetic variation., Nat Genet, 40, 646, 10.1038/ng.139 · DOI
  9. O Semino, 2004, Origin, diffusion, and differentiation of Y-chromosome haplogroups E and J: inferences on the neolithization of Europe and later migratory events in the Mediterranean area., Am J Hum Genet, 74, 1023, 10.1086/386295 · DOI
  10. S Rootsi, 2004, Phylogeography of Y-chromosome haplogroup I reveals distinct domains of prehistoric gene flow in Europe., Am J Hum Genet, 75, 128, 10.1086/422196 · DOI
  11. C Cinnioglu, 2004, Excavating Y-chromosome haplotype strata in Anatolia., Hum Genet, 114, 127, 10.1007/s00439-003-1031-4 · DOI
  12. M Pericic, 2005, High-resolution phylogenetic analysis of southeastern Europe traces major episodes of paternal gene flow among Slavic populations., Mol Biol Evol, 22, 1964, 10.1093/molbev/msi185 · DOI
  13. B Arredi, 2004, A predominantly neolithic origin for Y-chromosomal DNA variation in North Africa., Am J Hum Genet, 75, 338, 10.1086/423147 · DOI
  14. F Cruciani, 2002, A back migration from Asia to sub-Saharan Africa is supported by high-resolution analysis of human Y-chromosome haplotypes., Am J Hum Genet, 70, 1197, 10.1086/340257 · DOI
  15. S Beleza, 2005, The genetic legacy of western Bantu migrations., Hum Genet, 117, 366, 10.1007/s00439-005-1290-3 · DOI
  16. R Cordaux, 2004, Genetic evidence for the demic diffusion of agriculture to India., Science, 304, 1125, 10.1126/science.1095819 · DOI
  17. M. F Hammer, 2006, Dual origins of the Japanese: common ground for hunter-gatherer and farmer Y chromosomes., J Hum Genet, 51, 47, 10.1007/s10038-005-0322-0 · DOI
  18. B Wen, 2004, Genetic evidence supports demic diffusion of Han culture., Nature, 431, 302, 10.1038/nature02878 · DOI
  19. M Richards, 2000, Tracing European founder lineages in the near eastern mtDNA pool., Am J Hum Genet, 67, 1251, 10.1016/S0002-9297(07)62954-1 · DOI
  20. A Achilli, 2004, The molecular dissection of mtDNA haplogroup H confirms that the Franco-Cantabrian glacial refuge was a major source for the European gene pool., Am J Hum Genet, 75, 910, 10.1086/425590 · DOI
  21. A Torroni, 2001, A signal, from human mtDNA, of postglacial recolonization in Europe., Am J Hum Genet, 69, 844, 10.1086/323485 · DOI
  22. E. T Wood, 2005, Contrasting patterns of Y chromosome and mtDNA variation in Africa: evidence for sex-biased demographic processes., Eur J Hum Genet, 13, 867, 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201408 · DOI
  23. R. R Sokal, 1991, Genetic evidence for the spread of agriculture in Europe by demic diffusion., Nature, 351, 143, 10.1038/351143a0 · DOI
  24. A Auton, 2009, Global distribution of genomic diversity underscores rich complex history of continental human populations., Genome Res, 19, 795, 10.1101/gr.088898.108 · DOI
  25. S. M Adams, 2008, The genetic legacy of religious diversity and intolerance: paternal lineages of Christians, Jews and Muslims in the Iberian Peninsula., Am J Hum Genet, 83, 725, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.11.007 · DOI
  26. E Bosch, 2002, High resolution Y chromosome typing: 19 STRs amplified in three multiplex reactions., Forensic Sci Int, 125, 42, 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00627-2 · DOI
  27. E. J Parkin, 2006, 26-locus Y-STR typing in a Bhutanese population sample., Forensic Sci Int, 161, 1, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.008 · DOI
  28. M Kayser, 2001, An extensive analysis of Y-chromosomal microsatellite haplotypes in globally dispersed human populations., Am J Hum Genet, 68, 990, 10.1086/319510 · DOI · Paper page
  29. S Sengupta, 2006, Polarity and temporality of high-resolution Y-chromosome distributions in India identify both indigenous and exogenous expansions and reveal minor genetic influence of Central Asian pastoralists., Am J Hum Genet, 78, 202, 10.1086/499411 · DOI · Paper page
  30. D. B Goldstein, 1995, An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci., Genetics, 139, 463, 10.1093/genetics/139.1.463 · DOI
  31. I. J Wilson, 2003, Inferences from DNA data: population histories, evolutionary processes and forensic match probabilities., J Roy Statist Soc A, 166, 1
  32. D Marjanovic, 2005, The peopling of modern Bosnia-Herzegovina: Y-chromosome haplogroups in the three main ethnic groups., Ann Hum Genet, 69, 757, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00190.x · DOI
  33. M Kayser, 2005, Significant genetic differentiation between Poland and Germany follows present-day political borders, as revealed by Y-chromosome analysis., Hum Genet, 117, 428, 10.1007/s00439-005-1333-9 · DOI · Paper page
  34. R. J King, 2008, Differential Y-chromosome Anatolian influences on the Greek and Cretan Neolithic., Ann Hum Genet, 72, 205, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2007.00414.x · DOI
  35. L. T Moore, 2006, A Y-chromosome signature of hegemony in Gaelic Ireland., Am J Hum Genet, 78, 334, 10.1086/500055 · DOI
  36. D Contu, 2008, Y-chromosome based evidence for pre-neolithic origin of the genetically homogeneous but diverse Sardinian population: inference for association scans., PLoS ONE, 3, e1430, 10.1371/journal.pone.0001430 · DOI
  37. O Balanovsky, 2008, Two sources of the Russian patrilineal heritage in their Eurasian context., Am J Hum Genet, 82, 236, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.09.019 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Balaresque, P., Bowden, G. R., Adams, S. M., Leung, H.-Y., King, T. E., Rosser, Z. H., Goodwin, J., Moisan, J.-P., Richard, C., Millward, A., Demaine, A. G., Barbujani, G., Previderè, C., Wilson, I. J., Tyler-Smith, C., & Jobling, M. A.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2010-01-19
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e1000285
ISSN
1545-7885
Cited by
179
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review