A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation
Open accessAbstract
The role of chromosomal inversions in adaptation and speciation is controversial. Historically, inversions were thought to contribute to these processes either by directly causing hybrid sterility or by facilitating the maintenance of co-adapted gene complexes. Because inversions suppress recombination when heterozygous, a recently proposed local adaptation mechanism predicts that they will spread if they capture alleles at multiple loci involved in divergent adaptation to contrasting environments. Many empirical studies have found inversion polymorphisms linked to putatively adaptive phenotypes or distributed along environmental clines. However, direct involvement of an inversion in local adaptation and consequent ecological reproductive isolation has not to our knowledge been demonstrated in nature. In this study, we discovered that a chromosomal inversion polymorphism is geographically widespread, and we test the extent to which it contributes to adaptation and reproductive isolation under natural field conditions. Replicated crosses between the prezygotically reproductively isolated annual and perennial ecotypes of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus, revealed that alternative chromosomal inversion arrangements are associated with life-history divergence over thousands of kilometers across North America. The inversion polymorphism affected adaptive flowering time divergence and other morphological traits in all replicated crosses between four pairs of annual and perennial populations. To determine if the inversion contributes to adaptation and reproductive isolation in natural populations, we conducted a novel reciprocal transplant experiment involving outbred lines, where alternative arrangements of the inversion were reciprocally introgressed into the genetic backgrounds of each ecotype. Our results demonstrate for the first time in nature the contribution of an inversion to adaptation, an annual/perennial life-history shift, and multiple reproductive isolating barriers. These results are consistent with the local adaptation mechanism being responsible for the distribution of the two inversion arrangements across the geographic range of M. guttatus and that locally adaptive inversion effects contribute directly to reproductive isolation. Such a mechanism may be partially responsible for the observation that closely related species often differ by multiple chromosomal rearrangements.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More often, hybrids heterozygous for inversions, especially for inversions that are polymorphic within species, do not show visible reductions in fertility.
“More often, hybrids heterozygous for inversions, especially for inversions that are polymorphic within species, do not show visible reductions in fertility (Kianian and Quiros, 1992; Lowry and Willis, 2010; Fang et al., 2012; Stathos and Fishman, 2014; Ostevik et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2020).”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Lowry and Willis, 2010
The Discussion (page unavailable) says no underdominant effect on hybrid male fertility has been detected for this polymorphic inversion, supporting it as an example. It does not establish that such outcomes occur ‘more often’ across inversions, or address fertility beyond males. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Recombination suppressors and the evolution of new species
Trickett, A. J., & Butlin, R. K. (1994) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1994.180 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- [1]Stebbins G. L 1958 The inviability, weakness, and sterility of interspecific hybrids. Adv Genet 9 147 215 13520442
- [2]Mayr E 1982 Speciation and macroevolution. Evolution 36 1119 1132 28563569
- [3]Clausen J 1951 Stages in the evolution of plant species Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press
- [4]Dobzhansky T 1970 Genetics of the evolutionary process New York Columbia University Press
- [6]King M 1993 Species evolution: the role of chromosomal change Cambridge Cambridge University Press
- [8]Noor M. A. F Grams K. L Bertucci L. A Reiland J 2001 Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 98 12084 12088 PMC59771 11593019
- [9]Navarro A Barton N. H 2003 Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence: accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes. Science 300 321 324 12690198
- [11]Butlin R. K 2005 Recombination and speciation. Mol Ecol 14 2621 2635 16029465
- [12]Kirkpatrick M Barton N 2006 Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173 419 434 16204214 PMC1461441
- [13]Lowry D. B Modliszewski J. L Wright K. M Wu C. A Willis J. H 2008 The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants. Philos T R Soc B 363 3009 3021 PMC2607309 18579478
- [14]Noor M. A. F Bennett S. M 2009 Islands of speciation or mirages in the desert? Examining the role of restricted recombination in maintaining species. Heredity 103 439 444 19920849 PMC2809014
- [15]Lai Z Nakazato T Salmaso M Burke J. M Tang S. X 2005 Extensive chromosomal repatterning and the evolution of sterility barriers in hybrid sunflower species. Genetics 171 291 303 16183908 PMC1456521
- [16]Hoffmann A. A Rieseberg L. H 2008 Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation? Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 39 21 42 PMC2858385 20419035
- [17]Ortiz-Barrientos D Reiland J Hey J Noor M. A. F 2002 Recombination and the divergence of hybridizing species. Genetica 116 167 178 12555775
- [18]Ortiz-Barrientos D Counterman B. A Noor M. A. F 2004 The genetics of speciation by reinforcement. PLoS Biol 2 2256 2263 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020416 PMC529318 15550988 · DOI
- [19]Felsenstein J 1981 Skepticism toward Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals. Evolution 35 124 138 28563447
- [21]Servedio M. R 2000 Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 54 21 29 10937179
- [24]Dobzhansky T 1951 Genetics and the origin of species (3rd ed.) New York Columbia University Press
- [27]Feder J. L Xie X. F Rull J Velez S Forbes A 2005 Mayr, Dobzhansky, and Bush and the complexities of sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 6573 6580 PMC1131876 15851672
- [28]Umina P. A Weeks A. R Kearney M. R McKechnie S. W Hoffmann A. A 2005 A rapid shift in a classic clinal pattern in Drosophila reflecting climate change. Science 308 691 693 15860627
- [29]Balanya J Oller J. M Huey R. B Gilchrist G. W Serra L 2006 Global genetic change tracks global climate warming in Drosophila subobscura. Science 313 1773 1775 16946033
- [32]Dubinin N. P Tiniakov G. G 1946 Seasonal cycle and inversion frequency in populations. Nature 157 23 24 21015086
- [33]Stalker H. D Carson H. L 1949 Seasonal variation in the morphology of Drosophila robusta Sturtevant. Evolution 3 330 343 15396750
- [34]Feder J. L Roethele F. B Filchak K Niedbalski J Romero-Severson J 2003 Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella. Genetics 163 939 953 12663534 PMC1462491
- [35]Feder J. L Berlocher S. H Roethele J. B Dambroski H Smith J. J 2003 Allopatric genetic origins for sympatric host-plant shifts and race formation in Rhagoletis. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 100 10314 10319 PMC193558 12928500
- [36]Wu C. A Lowry D. B Cooley A. M Wright K. M Lee Y. W Willis J. H 2008 Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 100 220 230 17551519
- [37]Hall M. C Willis J. H 2006 Divergent selection on flowering time contributes to local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus populations. Evolution 60 2466 2477 17263109
- [38]Lowry D. B Rockwood R. C Willis J. H 2008 Ecological reproductive isolation of coast and inland races of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 62 2196 2214 18637837 PMC11110535
- [39]Lowry D. B Hall M. C Salt D. E Willis J. H 2009 Genetic and physiological basis of adaptive salt tolerance divergence between coastal and inland Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol 183 776 788 19549130
- [40]Hall M. C Lowry D. B Willis J. H 2010 Is local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus caused by trade-offs at individual loci? Mol Ecol 19 2739 2753 20546131 PMC11104436
- [41]Corbin J. D Thomsen M. A Dawson T. E D'Antonio C. M 2005 Summer water use by California coastal prairie grasses: fog, drought, and community composition. Oecologia 145 511 521 16001220
- [42]Hall M. C Basten C. J Willis J. H 2006 Pleiotropic quantitative trait loci contribute to population divergence in traits associated with life-history variation in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 172 1829 1844 16361232 PMC1456280
- [43]Sweigart A. L Willis J. H 2003 Patterns of nucleotide diversity in two species of Mimulus are affected by mating system and asymmetric introgression. Evolution 57 2490 2506 14686526
- [46]Martin N. H Willis J. H 2007 Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61 68 82 17300428
- [47]Manoukis N. C Powell J. R Toure M. B Sacko A Edillo F. E 2008 A test of the chromosomal theory of ecotypic speciation in Anopheles gambiae. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 2940 2945 PMC2268564 18287019
- [48]McAllister B. F Sheeley S. L Mena P. A Evans A. L Schlotterer C 2008 Clinal distribution of a chromosomal rearrangement: a precursor to chromosomal speciation? Evolution 62 1852 1865 18522710
- [50]Roux F Touzet P Cuguen J Le Corre V 2006 How to be early flowering: an evolutionary perspective. Trends Plant Sci 11 375 381 16843035
- [52]McKay J. K Richards J. H Nemali K. S Sen S Mitchell-Olds T 2008 Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. QTL analysis of a new mapping population, KAS-1×TSU-1. Evolution 62 3014 3026 18691264
- [53]Wu C. A Lowry D. B Nutter L. I Willis J. H 2010 Natural variation for drought-response traits in the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Oecologia 162 22 33 19727827
- [55]Grant V 1981 Plant speciation, 2nd ed New York Columbia University Press
- [57]Verhoeven K. J. F Poorter H Nevo E Biere A 2008 Habitat-specific natural selection at a flowering-time QTL is a main driver of local adaptation in two wild barley populations. Mol Ecol 17 3416 3424 18573164
- [58]Verhoeven K. J. F Vanhala T. K Biere A Nevo E Van Damme J. M. M 2004 The genetic basis of adaptive population differentiation: a quantitative trait locus analysis of fitness traits in two wild barley populations from contrasting habitats. Evolution 58 270 283 15068345
- [59]Gardner K. M Latta R. G 2006 Identifying loci under selection across contrasting environments in Avena barbata using quantitative trait locus mapping. Mol Ecol 15 1321 1333 16626456
- [60]Andreasen K Baldwin B. G 2001 Unequal evolutionary rates between annual and perennial lineages of checker mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae): evidence from 18S-26S rDNA internal and external transcribed spacers. Mol Biol Evol 18 936 944 11371581
- [61]Church S. A 2003 Molecular phylogenetics of Houstonia (Rubiaceae): descending aneuploidy and breeding system evolution in the radiation of the lineage across North America. Mol Phylogenet Evol 27 223 238 12695087
- [64]Shaw R. G Geyer C. J Wagenius S Hangelbroek H. H Etterson J. R 2008 Unifying life-history analyses for inference of fitness and population growth. Am Nat 172 E35 E47 18500940
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues
Andrés, F., & Coupland, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3291 · Cited by 1,538 · see citing works
Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
“Structural variants are known to be involved in local adaptation, including copy number variation (Perry et al. 2007; Prasad et al. 2012 a ), inversions (Lowry and Willis 2010; Kunte et al. 2014), and transposon insertions (González and Pe-trov 2009; Casacuberta and González 2013).”
Self-citationMassive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers
Todesco, M., Owens, G. L., Bercovich, N., Légaré, J.-S., Soudi, S., Burge, D. O., Huang, K., Ostevik, K. L., Drummond, E. B. M., Imerovski, I., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2467-6 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Recombination rate evolution and the origin of species
Ortiz-Barrientos, D., Engelstädter, J., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.016 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
When two rights make a wrong: the evolutionary genetics of plant hybrid incompatibilities
Fishman, L., & Sweigart, A. L. (2018) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040113 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Megabase-scale inversion polymorphism in the wild ancestor of maize
Fang, Z., Pyhäjärvi, T., Weber, A. L., Dawe, R. K., Glaubitz, J. C., González, J. D. J. S., Ross-Ibarra, C., Doebley, J., Morrell, P. L., & Ross-Ibarra, J. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.138578 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Feder, J. L., Gejji, R., Powell, T. H. Q., & Nosil, P. (2011) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01321.x · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Bock, D. G., Cai, Z., Elphinstone, C., González-Segovia, E., Hirabayashi, K., Huang, K., Keais, G. L., Kim, A., Owens, G. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2023) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100599 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“4 Plant Communications 4, 100599, September 11 2023 a 2023 Th visible reductions in fertility (Kianian and Quiros, 1992; Lowry and Willis, 2010; Fang et al., 2012; Stathos and Fishman, 2014; Ostevik et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2020).”
Reproductive isolation and introgression between sympatric<i>Mimulus</i>species
Kenney, A. M., & Sweigart, A. L. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13630 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Stathos, A., & Fishman, L. (2014) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12503 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lowry, D. B., & Willis, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lowry, David B.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-09-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1000500
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- PMC
- PMC2946948
- OpenAlex
- W2096346402
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 31.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2012-01-09)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0723814, 0328636, 0710094)
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Joint Genome Institute
- Ministry of Environment
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007754)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- chromosomal inversion polymorphism, local adaptation, reproductive isolation, life-history transitions, Mimulus guttatus, yellow monkeyflower, reciprocal transplant, introgression, speciation, hybrid sterility, recombination suppression, geographic cline
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Alleles, Humans, Chromosome Inversion, Polymorphism, Genetic, Reproduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review