Cited by 679Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation

Open access
Lowry, David B., Willis, John H.·2010·PLoS Biology

Abstract

The role of chromosomal inversions in adaptation and speciation is controversial. Historically, inversions were thought to contribute to these processes either by directly causing hybrid sterility or by facilitating the maintenance of co-adapted gene complexes. Because inversions suppress recombination when heterozygous, a recently proposed local adaptation mechanism predicts that they will spread if they capture alleles at multiple loci involved in divergent adaptation to contrasting environments. Many empirical studies have found inversion polymorphisms linked to putatively adaptive phenotypes or distributed along environmental clines. However, direct involvement of an inversion in local adaptation and consequent ecological reproductive isolation has not to our knowledge been demonstrated in nature. In this study, we discovered that a chromosomal inversion polymorphism is geographically widespread, and we test the extent to which it contributes to adaptation and reproductive isolation under natural field conditions. Replicated crosses between the prezygotically reproductively isolated annual and perennial ecotypes of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus, revealed that alternative chromosomal inversion arrangements are associated with life-history divergence over thousands of kilometers across North America. The inversion polymorphism affected adaptive flowering time divergence and other morphological traits in all replicated crosses between four pairs of annual and perennial populations. To determine if the inversion contributes to adaptation and reproductive isolation in natural populations, we conducted a novel reciprocal transplant experiment involving outbred lines, where alternative arrangements of the inversion were reciprocally introgressed into the genetic backgrounds of each ecotype. Our results demonstrate for the first time in nature the contribution of an inversion to adaptation, an annual/perennial life-history shift, and multiple reproductive isolating barriers. These results are consistent with the local adaptation mechanism being responsible for the distribution of the two inversion arrangements across the geographic range of M. guttatus and that locally adaptive inversion effects contribute directly to reproductive isolation. Such a mechanism may be partially responsible for the observation that closely related species often differ by multiple chromosomal rearrangements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000500

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More often, hybrids heterozygous for inversions, especially for inversions that are polymorphic within species, do not show visible reductions in fertility.

    “More often, hybrids heterozygous for inversions, especially for inversions that are polymorphic within species, do not show visible reductions in fertility (Kianian and Quiros, 1992; Lowry and Willis, 2010; Fang et al., 2012; Stathos and Fishman, 2014; Ostevik et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2020).”

    From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Lowry and Willis, 2010

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says no underdominant effect on hybrid male fertility has been detected for this polymorphic inversion, supporting it as an example. It does not establish that such outcomes occur ‘more often’ across inversions, or address fertility beyond males. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. [1]Stebbins G. L 1958 The inviability, weakness, and sterility of interspecific hybrids. Adv Genet 9 147 215 13520442
  2. [2]Mayr E 1982 Speciation and macroevolution. Evolution 36 1119 1132 28563569
  3. [3]Clausen J 1951 Stages in the evolution of plant species Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press
  4. [4]Dobzhansky T 1970 Genetics of the evolutionary process New York Columbia University Press
  5. [6]King M 1993 Species evolution: the role of chromosomal change Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  6. [8]Noor M. A. F Grams K. L Bertucci L. A Reiland J 2001 Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 98 12084 12088 PMC59771 11593019
  7. [9]Navarro A Barton N. H 2003 Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence: accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes. Science 300 321 324 12690198
  8. [11]Butlin R. K 2005 Recombination and speciation. Mol Ecol 14 2621 2635 16029465
  9. [12]Kirkpatrick M Barton N 2006 Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173 419 434 16204214 PMC1461441
  10. [13]Lowry D. B Modliszewski J. L Wright K. M Wu C. A Willis J. H 2008 The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants. Philos T R Soc B 363 3009 3021 PMC2607309 18579478
  11. [14]Noor M. A. F Bennett S. M 2009 Islands of speciation or mirages in the desert? Examining the role of restricted recombination in maintaining species. Heredity 103 439 444 19920849 PMC2809014
  12. [15]Lai Z Nakazato T Salmaso M Burke J. M Tang S. X 2005 Extensive chromosomal repatterning and the evolution of sterility barriers in hybrid sunflower species. Genetics 171 291 303 16183908 PMC1456521
  13. [16]Hoffmann A. A Rieseberg L. H 2008 Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation? Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 39 21 42 PMC2858385 20419035
  14. [17]Ortiz-Barrientos D Reiland J Hey J Noor M. A. F 2002 Recombination and the divergence of hybridizing species. Genetica 116 167 178 12555775
  15. [18]Ortiz-Barrientos D Counterman B. A Noor M. A. F 2004 The genetics of speciation by reinforcement. PLoS Biol 2 2256 2263 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020416 PMC529318 15550988 · DOI
  16. [19]Felsenstein J 1981 Skepticism toward Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals. Evolution 35 124 138 28563447
  17. [21]Servedio M. R 2000 Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 54 21 29 10937179
  18. [24]Dobzhansky T 1951 Genetics and the origin of species (3rd ed.) New York Columbia University Press
  19. [27]Feder J. L Xie X. F Rull J Velez S Forbes A 2005 Mayr, Dobzhansky, and Bush and the complexities of sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 6573 6580 PMC1131876 15851672
  20. [28]Umina P. A Weeks A. R Kearney M. R McKechnie S. W Hoffmann A. A 2005 A rapid shift in a classic clinal pattern in Drosophila reflecting climate change. Science 308 691 693 15860627
  21. [29]Balanya J Oller J. M Huey R. B Gilchrist G. W Serra L 2006 Global genetic change tracks global climate warming in Drosophila subobscura. Science 313 1773 1775 16946033
  22. [32]Dubinin N. P Tiniakov G. G 1946 Seasonal cycle and inversion frequency in populations. Nature 157 23 24 21015086
  23. [33]Stalker H. D Carson H. L 1949 Seasonal variation in the morphology of Drosophila robusta Sturtevant. Evolution 3 330 343 15396750
  24. [34]Feder J. L Roethele F. B Filchak K Niedbalski J Romero-Severson J 2003 Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella. Genetics 163 939 953 12663534 PMC1462491
  25. [35]Feder J. L Berlocher S. H Roethele J. B Dambroski H Smith J. J 2003 Allopatric genetic origins for sympatric host-plant shifts and race formation in Rhagoletis. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 100 10314 10319 PMC193558 12928500
  26. [36]Wu C. A Lowry D. B Cooley A. M Wright K. M Lee Y. W Willis J. H 2008 Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 100 220 230 17551519
  27. [37]Hall M. C Willis J. H 2006 Divergent selection on flowering time contributes to local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus populations. Evolution 60 2466 2477 17263109
  28. [38]Lowry D. B Rockwood R. C Willis J. H 2008 Ecological reproductive isolation of coast and inland races of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 62 2196 2214 18637837 PMC11110535
  29. [39]Lowry D. B Hall M. C Salt D. E Willis J. H 2009 Genetic and physiological basis of adaptive salt tolerance divergence between coastal and inland Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol 183 776 788 19549130
  30. [40]Hall M. C Lowry D. B Willis J. H 2010 Is local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus caused by trade-offs at individual loci? Mol Ecol 19 2739 2753 20546131 PMC11104436
  31. [41]Corbin J. D Thomsen M. A Dawson T. E D'Antonio C. M 2005 Summer water use by California coastal prairie grasses: fog, drought, and community composition. Oecologia 145 511 521 16001220
  32. [42]Hall M. C Basten C. J Willis J. H 2006 Pleiotropic quantitative trait loci contribute to population divergence in traits associated with life-history variation in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics 172 1829 1844 16361232 PMC1456280
  33. [43]Sweigart A. L Willis J. H 2003 Patterns of nucleotide diversity in two species of Mimulus are affected by mating system and asymmetric introgression. Evolution 57 2490 2506 14686526
  34. [46]Martin N. H Willis J. H 2007 Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61 68 82 17300428
  35. [47]Manoukis N. C Powell J. R Toure M. B Sacko A Edillo F. E 2008 A test of the chromosomal theory of ecotypic speciation in Anopheles gambiae. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 2940 2945 PMC2268564 18287019
  36. [48]McAllister B. F Sheeley S. L Mena P. A Evans A. L Schlotterer C 2008 Clinal distribution of a chromosomal rearrangement: a precursor to chromosomal speciation? Evolution 62 1852 1865 18522710
  37. [50]Roux F Touzet P Cuguen J Le Corre V 2006 How to be early flowering: an evolutionary perspective. Trends Plant Sci 11 375 381 16843035
  38. [52]McKay J. K Richards J. H Nemali K. S Sen S Mitchell-Olds T 2008 Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. QTL analysis of a new mapping population, KAS-1×TSU-1. Evolution 62 3014 3026 18691264
  39. [53]Wu C. A Lowry D. B Nutter L. I Willis J. H 2010 Natural variation for drought-response traits in the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Oecologia 162 22 33 19727827
  40. [55]Grant V 1981 Plant speciation, 2nd ed New York Columbia University Press
  41. [57]Verhoeven K. J. F Poorter H Nevo E Biere A 2008 Habitat-specific natural selection at a flowering-time QTL is a main driver of local adaptation in two wild barley populations. Mol Ecol 17 3416 3424 18573164
  42. [58]Verhoeven K. J. F Vanhala T. K Biere A Nevo E Van Damme J. M. M 2004 The genetic basis of adaptive population differentiation: a quantitative trait locus analysis of fitness traits in two wild barley populations from contrasting habitats. Evolution 58 270 283 15068345
  43. [59]Gardner K. M Latta R. G 2006 Identifying loci under selection across contrasting environments in Avena barbata using quantitative trait locus mapping. Mol Ecol 15 1321 1333 16626456
  44. [60]Andreasen K Baldwin B. G 2001 Unequal evolutionary rates between annual and perennial lineages of checker mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae): evidence from 18S-26S rDNA internal and external transcribed spacers. Mol Biol Evol 18 936 944 11371581
  45. [61]Church S. A 2003 Molecular phylogenetics of Houstonia (Rubiaceae): descending aneuploidy and breeding system evolution in the radiation of the lineage across North America. Mol Phylogenet Evol 27 223 238 12695087
  46. [64]Shaw R. G Geyer C. J Wagenius S Hangelbroek H. H Etterson J. R 2008 Unifying life-history analyses for inference of fitness and population growth. Am Nat 172 E35 E47 18500940

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lowry, D. B., & Willis, J. H.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Lowry, David B.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2010-09-28
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
e1000500
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2096346402
Cited by
679
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 30
FWCI
31.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0723814, 0328636, 0710094)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Joint Genome Institute
  • Ministry of Environment
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007754)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
chromosomal inversion polymorphism, local adaptation, reproductive isolation, life-history transitions, Mimulus guttatus, yellow monkeyflower, reciprocal transplant, introgression, speciation, hybrid sterility, recombination suppression, geographic cline
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Alleles, Humans, Chromosome Inversion, Polymorphism, Genetic, Reproduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review