Cited by 154RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyRNA modifications and cancer

SecM-Stalled Ribosomes Adopt an Altered Geometry at the Peptidyl Transferase Center

Open access
Bhushan, Shashi, Hoffmann, Thomas, Seidelt, Birgit, Frauenfeld, Jens, Mielke, Thorsten, Berninghausen, Otto, Wilson, Daniel N., Beckmann, Roland·2011·PLoS Biology

Abstract

As nascent polypeptide chains are synthesized, they pass through a tunnel in the large ribosomal subunit. Interaction between specific nascent chains and the ribosomal tunnel is used to induce translational stalling for the regulation of gene expression. One well-characterized example is the Escherichia coli SecM (secretion monitor) gene product, which induces stalling to up-regulate translation initiation of the downstream secA gene, which is needed for protein export. Although many of the key components of SecM and the ribosomal tunnel have been identified, understanding of the mechanism by which the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome is inactivated has been lacking. Here we present a cryo-electron microscopy reconstruction of a SecM-stalled ribosome nascent chain complex at 5.6 Å. While no cascade of rRNA conformational changes is evident, this structure reveals the direct interaction between critical residues of SecM and the ribosomal tunnel. Moreover, a shift in the position of the tRNA-nascent peptide linkage of the SecM-tRNA provides a rationale for peptidyl transferase center silencing, conditional on the simultaneous presence of a Pro-tRNA(Pro) in the ribosomal A-site. These results suggest a distinct allosteric mechanism of regulating translational elongation by the SecM stalling peptide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000581

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loop III of TetM is less well-resolved than loops I and II, but additional electron density is clearly observable within the TetM•70S map and is absent in other cryo-EM maps lacking A-site ligands.

    “Loop III of TetM linking β5 4 to helix αB 4 is less well-resolved than loops I and II, yet additional electron density is clearly observable within the TetM•70S map (Fig. 3C), which, in contrast, is absent in other cryo-EM maps lacking A-site ligands, such as the SecM-stalled ribosome nascent chain complex (26) (Fig. 3D).”

    From Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance (2012) · cites this paper as [26]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhushan, S., Hoffmann, T., Seidelt, B., Frauenfeld, J., Mielke, T., Berninghausen, O., Wilson, D. N., & Beckmann, R.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Wilson, Daniel N.
  • Beckmann, Roland
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2011-01-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
e1000581
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2168458051
Cited by
154
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 646, WI3285/1-1, SFB740, SFB 594)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
SecM, ribosome stalling, peptidyl transferase center, ribosomal tunnel, nascent polypeptide chains, ribosome-nascent chain complex, allosteric regulation, protein secretion, SecA, Escherichia coli
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Molecular Conformation, Peptidyl Transferases, Ribosomes, RNA, Transfer, Transcription Factors, Protein Biosynthesis, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Catalytic Domain, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Protein Structure, Quaternary, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review