Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
Open accessAbstract
Ribosome protection proteins (RPPs) confer tetracycline resistance by binding to the ribosome and chasing the drug from its binding site. The current model for the mechanism of action of RPPs proposes that drug release is indirect and achieved via conformational changes within the drug-binding site induced upon binding of the RPP to the ribosome. Here we report a cryo-EM structure of the RPP TetM in complex with the 70S ribosome at 7.2-Å resolution. The structure reveals the contacts of TetM with the ribosome, including interaction between the conserved and functionally critical C-terminal extension of TetM and the decoding center of the small subunit. Moreover, we observe direct interaction between domain IV of TetM and the tetracycline binding site and identify residues critical for conferring tetracycline resistance. A model is presented whereby TetM directly dislodges tetracycline to confer resistance.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
A 7.2-Å cryo-EM structure of the ribosome protection protein TetM bound to the 70S ribosome shows that TetM directly contacts the tetracycline binding site via domain IV loop III and the decoding center via its C-terminal extension. The authors propose that TetM directly dislodges tetracycline and leaves the ribosome in a conformation that prevents drug rebinding while promoting ternary complex binding.
Key findings
- The TetM•GDPNP•70S complex was reconstructed at 7.2-Å resolution (EMD-2183; PDB 3J25) from 406,687 particles; sorting yielded 27% TetM-bound nonrotated 70S, 40% rotated 70S without TetM, and 33% nonrotated 70S without TetM.
- TetM’s conserved C-terminal extension (CTE) was modeled as an 11-aa α-helix (residues 627–637) that interacts with H69 of 23S rRNA and h44 of 16S rRNA near A1492/A1493, stabilizing a flipped-out decoding-center conformation; deleting the CTE (stop at residue 623) reduced tetracycline resistance to MIC50 ∼0.4 μg/mL, similar to no-TetM BL21 (∼0.6 μg/mL), whereas WT TetM raised MIC50 ∼14-fold to ∼10 μg/mL.
- Domain IV loop III directly contacts C1054 in the primary tetracycline binding site; no density for tigecycline (Tgc) was observed in the TetM•70S map despite complex formation with 10 μM Tgc, and the Tgc C9-glycyl side chain was proposed to sterically hinder loop III, helping explain how Tgc overcomes TetM-mediated resistance.
- Alanine scanning showed single loop III substitutions had no significant effect, but double Y506A-Y507A and triple Y507A-S508A-P509A TetM variants were inactive, while S508A-P509A-V510A retained activity.
Methods
- E. coli 70S ribosomes (0.4 μM) were mixed with Tgc (10 μM), incubated at 37 °C for 20 min with purified recombinant E. faecalis TetM (4 μM) and GDPNP (500 μM); cryo-EM data were collected on a Titan Krios and processed with SPIDER, yielding a 7.2-Å map at FSC 0.5.
- A homology model of E. faecalis TetM was built on the EF-G template using HHpred and Modeler, then fitted as rigid bodies to cryo-EM density with Coot and Chimera alongside ribosome crystal structures.
- Site-specific tetM mutations were introduced with QuikChange, and minimal inhibitory concentrations were determined; growth of E. coli BL21 with or without TetM variants was compared across tetracycline concentrations (0–128 μg/mL).
Limitations
- The paper states that at 7.2-Å resolution interactions can only be approximated, with closest residues listed at sites of density fusion; no crystal structure of any RPP was available, so TetM was homology-modeled on EF-G, and the CTE could not be generated by homology modeling.
- The paper notes that the previous TetO map was not deposited, preventing direct comparison, and that no structure was reported for Tgc•70S, so the Tgc binding position was modeled into the primary tetracycline site based on chemical similarity.
- Evident from the text: loop III is less well-resolved than loops I and II, and filtering the TetM•70S map to the TetO•70S resolution loses loop III density; single loop III alanine substitutions did not significantly affect resistance, with inactivity seen only for double/triple mutants.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
Domain IV of TetM directly interacts with the tetracycline binding site.
“Moreover, we observe direct interaction between domain IV of TetM and the tetracycline binding site and identify residues critical for conferring tetracycline resistance.”
- Also stated in: § Domain IV of TetM Directly Encroaches Upon the Tetracycline Binding · plain
“Domain IV of TetM Directly Encroaches Upon the Tetracycline Binding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Domain IV of TetM Directly Encroaches Upon the Tetracycline Binding · plain
- Findingown data
Domain IV of TetM interacts with the cleft between the head and body of the small subunit.
“Domain IV of TetM interacts with the cleft between the head and body of the small subunit (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Density connects the distal end of helix-αA of the TetM C-terminal extension with helix 44 of the 16S rRNA, in close proximity to A1492 and A1493.
“Additionally, density is seen connecting the distal end of helix-αA of the TetM-CTE with helix 44 of the 16S rRNA, in close proximity to A1492 and A1493 (Fig. 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loop II of TetM interacts with the proximal end of h34 of the 16S rRNA, with residues Ser465-Leu466-Gly467 coming into close proximity with the backbone of C1209 and the nucleobase of C1214.
“Loop II between β4 4 and αA 4 interacts with the proximal end of h34 of the 16S rRNA, with residues Ser465-Leu466-Gly467 ( 465 SLG 467 ) coming into close proximity with the backbone of C1209 and the nucleobase of C1214 (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Additional density in the TetM•70S map fuses directly with C1054 of the 16S rRNA, a component of the primary tetracycline binding site.
“This additional density in the TetM•70S map fuses directly with C1054 of the 16S rRNA, a component of the primary tetracycline binding site (2, 3), and is consistent with the protection of C1054 from DMS modification observed upon TetO binding to the ribosome (15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
- Findingcitation
The overall orientation of TetM on the ribosome is similar to that observed previously for TetO.
“The overall orientation of TetM on the ribosome is similar to that observed previously for TetO (14), although no direct comparison can be made because the TetO map was not deposited in a public database.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
Residues critical for conferring tetracycline resistance were identified.
“Moreover, we observe direct interaction between domain IV of TetM and the tetracycline binding site and identify residues critical for conferring tetracycline resistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The C-terminal extension of TetM was modeled as a short 11-amino-acid α-helix (residues 627-637) connected to domain V by a flexible unstructured loop.
“Therefore, the CTE of TetM was modeled as a short 11-aa α-helix (residues 627-637) connected to domain V by a flexible unstructured loop (Fig. 2B), in accordance with secondary structure predictions (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
TetM significantly overlaps with the anticodon stem-loop of the A-tRNA.
“TetM significantly overlaps with the anticodon stem-loop of the A-tRNA (Fig. 1C), as observed for EF-G bound to a posttranslocation state ribosome (22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
No density for tigecycline is observable in the TetM•70S map although the complex was formed in the presence of 10 μM tigecycline.
“Although the TetM•70S complex was formed in the presence of 10 μM Tgc, no density for the drug is observable in the TetM•70S map (Fig. 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Three loops protrude from one end of domain IV of TetM, referred to as loops I, II, and III.
“Three loops protrude from one end of domain IV of TetM, hereafter referred to as loops I, II, and III (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
A cryo-EM structure of the ribosome protection protein TetM in complex with the 70S ribosome was determined at 7.2-Å resolution.
“Here we report a cryo-EM structure of the RPP TetM in complex with the 70S ribosome at 7.2-Å resolution.”
- Also stated in: § Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance · plain
“we have determined a cryo-EM structure of the RPP TetM bound to the 70S ribosome at 7.2-Å resolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance · plain
- Findingown data
Tyrosine 507 of TetM comes into close proximity of C1054 in the TetM•70S model.
“The equivalent residue to H583 of E. coli EF-G in TetM is tyrosine 507 (Y507; SI Appendix, Fig. S1), which, in the TetM•70S model, comes into close proximity of C1054 (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No single alanine substitution within loop III of TetM exhibited a significant effect on the ability of TetM to confer tetracycline resistance.
“Surprisingly, no single alanine substitution within loop III of TetM exhibited a significant effect on the ability of TetM to confer tetracycline resistance (shown for Y506A and Y507A in Fig. 4B)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loop III of TetM contains a number of residues that are highly conserved in ribosome protection proteins, in particular the 508SPVS511 motif that directly follows Y507.
“Moreover, loop III contains a number of residues that are highly conserved in RPPs, in particular the 508 SPVS 511 motif that directly follows Y507 (SI Appendix, Fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pelleting assays confirmed that binding of TetM to the 70S ribosome was observed in the presence of tigecycline.
“Pelleting assays confirmed that binding of TetM to the 70S ribosome was observed in the presence of Tgc, suggesting that analysis of this complex by cryo-EM may enable TetM and Tgc to be visualized simultaneously on the same ribosome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No additional density for tigecycline is observed within any of the secondary tetracycline binding sites in the TetM•70S map.
“In contrast to tetracycline, which has multiple binding sites on the ribosome (2, 3), a careful examination of the TetM•70S map reveals no additional density for Tgc within any of the sec- ondary tetracycline binding sites (SI Appendix, Fig. S10 I-M).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Density for tigecycline is clearly present in the nonrotated and rotated 70S ribosomes where TetM is not bound.
“Density for Tgc is, however, clearly present in the nonrotated (Fig. 3F) and rotated (SI Appendix, Fig. S10 A-C) 70S ribosomes where TetM is not bound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overexpression of E. faecalis TetM raises the tetracycline MIC50 by 14-fold to approximately 10 μg/mL.
“whereas, as expected, overexpression of E. faecalis TetM (Fig. 4B, red circles) raises the MIC 50 by 14-fold to ∼10 μg/mL (Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Binding of TetM to the ribosome induces A1492 and A1493 to adopt a flipped-out conformation analogous to that observed during decoding of the mRNA by EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA.
“Moreover, binding of TetM to the ribosome induces A1492 and A1493 to adopt a flipped-out conformation (Fig. 2 C and D), analogous to that observed during decoding of the mRNA by EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA (25) (Fig. 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
E. faecalis TetM is comprised of five domains, labeled I through V.
“Like EF-G, E. faecalis TetM is comprised of five domains, labeled I through V (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
TetM induces a conformation in the stalk base analogous to that observed in the EF-Tu•70S structure.
“Finally, we observe that TetM also induces a conformation in the stalk base, analogous to that observed in the EF-Tu•70S structure (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In the absence of TetM protein, the wild-type E. coli strain BL21 is sensitive to tetracycline with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC50) of approximately 0.6 μg/mL.
“In the absence of TetM protein, the WT E. coli strain (Fig. 4B, black squares) is sensitive to tetracycline with minimal inhibition concentration (MIC 50 ) of ∼0.6 μg/mL”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TetM binds preferentially to the nonrotated 70S ribosome state.
“The absence of a subpopulation of TetM bound to rotated 70S ribosomes suggests that TetM binds preferentially to the nonrotated state, i.e., analogous to the expected (posttranslocational) substrate resulting from tetracycline inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The overall orientation of TetM structurally mimics more closely the position of EF-Tu•tRNA bound to the 70S ribosome than that of EF-G.
“The overall orientation of TetM appears rather to structurally mimic more closely the position of EF- Tu•tRNA bound to the 70S ribosome (SI Appendix, Fig. S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The flipped-out conformation of A1492 and A1493 remains after the ribosome protection protein has left the ribosome.
“The enhancement of A1408 is also observed when TetO is bound with GTP rather than GDPNP (15), suggesting that the flipped-out conformation of A1492 and A1493 remains after the RPP has left the ribosome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Domain IV of TetM is structurally analogous to EF-G, containing a four-stranded β-sheet and two α-helices with an overall βββαβα topology.
“Sequence alignments (SI Appendix, Fig. S1) and homology modeling suggest that domain IV of TetM is structurally analogous to EF-G, containing a four-stranded β-sheet and two α-helices, with an overall βββαβα topology (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
TetM directly dislodges tetracycline to confer resistance.
“A model is presented whereby TetM directly dislodges tetracycline to confer resistance.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · hedged
“In conclusion, our structure suggests that TetM confers resistance to tetracycline using a direct mechanism (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusion · hedged
- Study design and conductown data
The final density map for the TetM•70S complex has a resolution of 7.2 Å, determined using the Fourier shell correlation cutoff value of 0.5.
“Further refinement of the TetM•70S complex resulted in a final density map (Fig. 1A) with a resolution of 7.2 Å (EMD-2183), as determined by using the Fourier shell correlation cutoff value of 0.5 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The structural features imparted by TetM on the ribosome would contribute to the synergistic effect that TetM has been proposed to have on EF-Tu binding to the ribosome.
“Collectively, we believe these structural features imparted by TetM on the ribosome would contribute to the synergistic effect that TetM has been proposed to have on EF-Tu binding to the ribosome (16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Mutagenesis data suggest that residues especially Y506 and Y507 within loop III of TetM are likely to be important for inducing the conformational change.
“Additionally, the mutagenesis data (Fig. 4B) suggest that residues especially Y506 and Y507 within loop III of TetM are likely to be important for inducing this conformational change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
TetM dislodges tetracycline from its binding site on the ribosome by disrupting the reported stacking interaction between the aromatic ring D of tetracycline and the nucleobase of C1054.
“This suggests that TetM dislodges tetracycline from its binding site on the ribosome by disrupting the reported stacking interaction between the aromatic ring D of tetracycline and the nucleobase of C1054 (2), in agreement with a previous proposal (15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The altered conformation of C1054, together with the flipped-out conformation of A1492 and A1493 induced by interaction with the C-terminal extension of TetM, as well as the closed conformation of the stalk base, promote rapid binding of the ternary complex EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA.
“(iii) The altered conformation of C1054, together with the flipped-out conformation of A1492 and A1493 induced by interaction with the CTE of TetM, as well as the closed conformation of the stalk base, promote rapid binding of the ternary complex EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA (Fig. 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TetM employs residues including Y506 and Y507 within loop III of domain IV to directly interact and alter the conformation of nucleotide C1054 within h34 of the 16S rRNA that comprises part of the tetracycline binding site.
“(i) TetM employs residues including Y506 and Y507 within loop III of domain IV to directly interact and alter the conformation of nucleotide C1054 within h34 of the 16S rRNA that comprises part of the tetracycline binding site (Fig. 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The observed binding position of tigecycline was modeled into the primary tetracycline binding site based on similarity of the chemical structures of tigecycline and tetracycline.
“Because there is no structure reported for Tgc•70S, the observed binding position of Tgc was modeled into the primary tetracycline binding site (2, 3) based on similarity of the chemical structures of the two drugs (SI Appendix, Fig. S10 D-H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- The authors state this as an assumption: Tigecycline binds the primary tetracycline binding site in a manner similar to tetracycline, as inferred from the similarity of their chemical structures.
- Premisecitation§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
TetO and TetM catalyze the release of tetracycline from the ribosome in a GTP-dependent manner.
“Accordingly, TetO and TetM catalyze the release of tetracycline from the ribosome in a GTP-dependent manner (12,13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
GTP hydrolysis is not strictly required to dislodge tetracycline because drug release also occurs in the presence of nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues.
“Although GTPase activity is required for multiturnover of RPPs, GTP hydrolysis is however not strictly required to dislodge tetracycline because drug release also occurs in the presence of nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues (12,13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The absence of secondary binding sites illustrates the increased specificity of tigecycline compared with tetracycline.
“the absence of secondary binding sites illustrates the increased specificity of Tgc compared with tetracycline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Tigecycline binds the primary tetracycline binding site in a manner similar to tetracycline, as inferred from the similarity of their chemical structures.
- Premisecitation§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
Crystal structures of the 30S ribosomal subunit in complex with tetracycline reveal the primary binding site to be located in helix 34 of the 16S rRNA, in a position overlapping with the anticodon stem-loop of A-site tRNA.
“Consistently, crystal structures of the small (30S) ribosomal subunit in complex with tetracycline reveal the primary binding site to be located in helix 34 (h34) of the 16S rRNA, in a position overlapping with the anticodon stem-loop of A-site tRNA (A-tRNA) (2, 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance
TetO was suggested to chase tetracycline from the ribosome indirectly via inducing local disturbances within h34.
“As TetO is not observed to directly interact with C1054 or A1408 (14), TetO was suggested to chase tetracycline from the ribosome indirectly via inducing local disturbances within h34 (9,14,15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
- May combine two claims. 18
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationEF-G is shifted in position relative to TetM, being located closer to the 30S subunit and further away from the stalk base of the 50S subunit.
“whereas the overall orientation of TetM on the ribosome is similar to that of EF-G (22), EF-G is shifted in position relative to TetM, being located closer to the 30S subunit and further away from the stalk base of the 50S subunit (Fig. 1D and SI Appendix, Fig. S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe C-terminal extension of TetM interacts with a loop region at the tip of domain IV of TetM and with H69 of the 23S rRNA.
“The CTE interacts with a loop region at the tip of domain IV of TetM, but also with H69 of the 23S rRNA (Fig. 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe proline-rich loop I of TetM is bent significantly to allow interaction with the RPP-specific C-terminal helix-αA CTE, whereas loop I of EF-G is longer and adopts an extended conformation on the ribosome that establishes interaction with the P-tRNA.
“The proline-rich loop I, located between β2 4 and β3 4 , is bent significantly to allow interaction with the RPP-specific C-terminal helix-αA CTE (SI Appendix, Fig. S8A), whereas, in contrast, loop I of EF-G is longer and adopts an extended conformation on the ribosome that establishes interaction with the P-tRNA (22) (SI Appendix, Fig. S8B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataLoop III of TetM is less well-resolved than loops I and II, but additional electron density is clearly observable within the TetM•70S map and is absent in other cryo-EM maps lacking A-site ligands.
“Loop III of TetM linking β5 4 to helix αB 4 is less well-resolved than loops I and II, yet additional electron density is clearly observable within the TetM•70S map (Fig. 3C), which, in contrast, is absent in other cryo-EM maps lacking A-site ligands, such as the SecM-stalled ribosome nascent chain complex (26) (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe binding position of TetM does not overlap with the mRNA and does not appear to encroach on the P-site.
“However, the binding position of TetM does not overlap in position with the mRNA, and, unlike EF-G, TetM does not appear to encroach on the P-site (SI Ap- pendix, Fig. S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistanceThe TetM-70S structure reveals contacts of TetM with the ribosome, including interaction between the conserved C-terminal extension of TetM and the decoding center of the small subunit.
“The structure reveals the contacts of TetM with the ribosome, including interaction between the conserved and functionally critical C-terminal extension of TetM and the decoding center of the small subunit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDeletion of the C-terminal extension of TetM extensively inhibited resistance activity, decreasing the MIC50 value to approximately 0.4 μg/mL, similar to that observed in the absence of TetM overexpression.
“whereas, in contrast, deletion of the CTE of TetM extensively inhibited resistance activity, decreasing the MIC 50 value (∼0.4 μg/mL; Fig. 4B, blue triangles) to that observed in the absence of TetM overexpression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDouble and triple mutations within loop III of TetM identified the Y506A-Y507A (YY/AA) and Y507A-S508A-P509A (YSP/AAA) TetM variants as inactive, whereas the S508A-P509A-V510A (SPV/AAA) triple mutant retained activity.
“Subsequent analysis of double and triple mutations within loop III of TetM led to the identification of the Y506A-Y507A (YY/AA) and Y507A-S508A-P509A (YSP/AAA) TetM variants as inactive, whereas the S508A-P509A-V510A (SPV/ AAA) triple mutant retained activity (Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBinding of TetM (and TetO) to the ribosome leads to flipping out of A1492 and A1493, a conformation stabilized via interaction with the C-terminal extension of TetM.
“Collectively, these results suggest that binding of both TetM (and TetO) to the ribosome leads to the flipping out of A1492 and A1493-a conformation that is stabilized via interaction with the CTE of TetM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTetM can bind to the tigecycline•70S complex and recycle tigecycline, but does so too inefficiently compared with tetracycline to allow translation levels necessary for viability.
“As we observe the presence of a small population of 70S ribosome containing TetM (27%; SI Appendix, Fig. S2A), we conclude that TetM can bind to the Tgc•70S complex and recycle Tgc; however, it does so too inefficiently (compared with tetracycline) as to allow translation levels necessary for viability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Tigecycline binds the primary tetracycline binding site in a manner similar to tetracycline, as inferred from the similarity of their chemical structures.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe flipped-out conformation of A1492 and A1493 persists upon dissociation of TetM from the ribosome, which promotes binding of the ternary complex.
“Footprinting experiments suggest that the flipped-out conformation of A1492 and A1493 persists upon dissociation of TetM from the ribosome (16), which promote binding of the ternary complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistanceTetracyclines bind to elongating ribosomes and inhibit delivery of the ternary complex EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA to the A-site.
“Tetracyclines are broad-spectrum antibiotic agents that bind to elongating ribosomes and inhibit delivery of the ternary complex EF-Tu, GTP and aminoacylated-tRNA (EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA) to the A-site (1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistanceThe conformational changes were proposed to persist after TetO has dissociated from the ribosome, preventing rebinding of tetracycline as well as stimulating delivery of the ternary complex.
“Moreover, the conformational changes were proposed to persist after TetO has dissociated from the ribosome, preventing rebinding of tetracycline as well as stimulating delivery of the ternary complex (9,16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe altered conformation of C1054 perturbs the stacking interaction with tetracycline, leading to its dissociation from the ribosome and preventing rebinding.
“(ii) The altered conformation of C1054 perturbs stacking interaction with tetracycline, leading to its dissociation from the ribosome and prevents rebinding (Fig. 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTetracycline, which lacks the C9-glycyl side chain, exhibits significantly less overlap with the TetM density and would still permit interaction between the side chains within loop III and C1054 in h34 of the 16S rRNA.
“Compared with Tgc, tetracycline that lacks the C9-glycyl side chain (SI Appendix, Fig. S10 G and H) exhibits significantly less overlap with the TetM density and would still permit interaction between the side chains within loop III and C1054 in h34 of the 16S rRNA (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistanceThird-generation tetracycline derivatives such as tigecycline display enhanced antimicrobial activity, overcoming efflux and ribosome protection mechanisms.
“The third generation of tetracycline derivatives, such as tigecycline (Tgc), display enhanced antimicrobial activity, overcoming efflux and ribosome protection mechanisms (6)(7)(8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe attached C9-glycyl side chain of tigecycline would prevent access of the residues of loop III of TetM, and this steric hindrance contributes, together with the increased affinity of tigecycline, to explaining how tigecycline overcomes TetM-mediated resistance whereas tetracycline cannot.
“In contrast, the attached C9-glycyl side chain of Tgc would prevent access of the residues of loop III of TetM (Fig. 3 E and F), leading us to suggest that this steric hindrance contributes, together with the increased affinity of Tgc (7,8,27), to explaining how Tgc overcomes TetM-mediated resistance whereas tetracycline cannot (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Tigecycline binds the primary tetracycline binding site in a manner similar to tetracycline, as inferred from the similarity of their chemical structures.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe conformation of C1054 and U1196 in the TetM•70S structure appears to be most compatible with binding of EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA and would disfavor rebinding of tetracycline.
“Indeed, our findings provide structural support for this model, as the conformation of C1054 and U1196 in the TetM•70S structure appears to be most compatible with binding of EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA (Fig. 4D) and would disfavor rebinding of tetracycline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAt 7.2-Å resolution, the interactions between TetM and the ribosome can only be approximated, and the closest residues at the site of density fusion are listed.
“At 7.2-Å resolution, the interactions can only be approximated, and thus the closest residues between TetM and the ribosome at the site of density fusion are listed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistanceBinding of TetO to the ribosome leads to protection of C1214 and to a lesser extent C1054 within h34 from chemical modification, whereas the reactivity of A1408 in h44 is enhanced.
“Binding of TetO to the ribosome leads to protection of C1214 and to a lesser extent C1054 within h34 from chemical modification, whereas the reactivity of A1408 in h44 is enhanced (15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Tigecycline binds the primary tetracycline binding site in a manner similar to tetracycline, as inferred from the similarity of their chemical structures.
“Because there is no structure reported for Tgc•70S, the observed binding position of Tgc was modeled into the primary tetracycline binding site (2, 3) based on similarity of the chemical structures of the two drugs (SI Appendix, Fig. S10 D-H).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TetM directly dislodges and releases tetracycline from the ribosome by interaction between domain IV of the 16S rRNA and the tetracycline binding site, and this interaction alters ribosomal conformation, preventing rebinding of the antibiotic.
“Dönhöfer et al. recently showed that TetM directly dislodges and releases tetracycline from the ribosome by an interaction between the domain IV of the 16S rRNA and the tetracycline binding site. Furthermore, this interaction alters the ribosomal conformation, preventing rebinding of the antibiotic (52).”
From Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance (2016) · cites this paper as [52]
The results agree with the results by Wilson and coworkers in all essential details, as expected based on the high sequence homology between Tet(O) and Tet(M).
“Our results agree with the results by Wilson and coworkers in all essential details, as expected based on the high sequence homology between Tet(O) and Tet(M).”
From Mechanism of tetracycline resistance by ribosomal protection protein Tet(O) (2013) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
TetM-ΔCTE has conflicting colors in the text and figure caption
MinorThe results describe the TetM-ΔCTE data as blue triangles, while the Fig. 4B caption identifies TetM-ΔCTE as pink and assigns blue to TetM-YY/AA.
“decreasing the MIC 50 value (∼0.4 μg/mL; Fig. 4B, blue triangles)”
“(TetM-ΔCTE, pink), TetM-YSP/AAA, (orange), TetM-SPV/AAA (purple), TetM-YY/AA (blue)”
Cites
UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Couch, G. S., Greenblatt, D. M., Meng, E. C., & Ferrin, T. E. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20084 · Cited by 45,260 · see citing works
<i>Coot</i> : model-building tools for molecular graphics
Emsley, P., & Cowtan, K. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904019158 · Cited by 30,571 · see citing works
Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.
Jones, D. C. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091 · Cited by 5,741 · see citing works
Chopra, I., & Roberts, M. (2001) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.65.2.232-260.2001 · Cited by 4,517 · see citing works
The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction
Söding, J., Biegert, A., & Lupas, A. N. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki408 · Cited by 3,703 · see citing works
SPIDER and WEB: Processing and Visualization of Images in 3D Electron Microscopy and Related Fields
Frank, J., Radermacher, M., Penczek, P. A., Zhu, J., Li, Y., Ladjadj, M., & Leith, A. G. (1996) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1006/jsbi.1996.0030 · Cited by 2,026 · see citing works
The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources
Kiefer, F., Arnold, K., Künzli, M., Bordoli, L., & Schwede, T. F. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn750 · Cited by 2,003 · see citing works
Protein Structure Modeling with MODELLER
Eswar, N., Eramian, D., Webb, B., Shen, M., & Šali, A. (2008) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-058-8_8 · Cited by 1,781 · see citing works
Structures of the Bacterial Ribosome at 3.5 A Resolution
Schuwirth, B. S., Borovinskaya, M. A., Hau, C. W., Zhang, W., Vila‐Sanjurjo, A., Holton, J. M., & Cate, J. H. D. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117230 · Cited by 1,417 · see citing works
Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases
Leipe, D. D., Wolf, Y. I., Koonin, E. V., & Aravind, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.5378 · Cited by 1,148 · see citing works
Update on acquired tetracycline resistance genes
Roberts, M. C. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.034 · Cited by 1,010 · see citing works
Brodersen, D. E., Clemons, W. M., Carter, A. P., Morgan-Warren, R. J., Wimberly, B. T., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00216-6 · Cited by 950 · cited 19× · see citing works
“In contrast to tetracycline, which has multiple binding sites on the ribosome (2, 3), a careful examination of the TetM•70S map reveals no additional density for Tgc within any of the secondary tetracycline binding sites (SI Appendix, Fig.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe Crystal Structure of the Ribosome Bound to EF-Tu and Aminoacyl-tRNA
Schmeing, T. M., Voorhees, R. M., Kelley, A. C., Gao, Y., Murphy, F. V., Weir, J. R., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179700 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Crystal structures of complexes of the small ribosomal subunit with tetracycline, edeine and IF3
Pioletti, M., Schlünzen, F., Harms, J., Zarivach, R., Glühmann, M., Avila, H., Bashan, A., Bartels, H., Auerbach, T., Jacobi, C., et al. (2001) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/20.8.1829 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
The Structure of the Ribosome with Elongation Factor G Trapped in the Posttranslocational State
Gao, Y.-G., Selmer, M., Dunham, C. M., Weixlbaumer, A., Kelley, A. C., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179709 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Ribosomal Protection Proteins and Their Mechanism ofTetracyclineResistance
Connell, S. R., Tracz, D. M., Nierhaus, K. H., & Taylor, D. E. (2003) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.47.12.3675-3681.2003 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Insights into the decoding mechanism from recent ribosome structures
Ogle, J. M., Carter, A. P., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2003) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(03)00066-5 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
The Mechanism for Activation of GTP Hydrolysis on the Ribosome
Voorhees, R. M., Schmeing, T. M., Kelley, A. C., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194460 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Protein annotation and modelling servers at University College London
Buchan, D. W. A., Ward, S. M., Lobley, A., Nugent, T., Bryson, K., & Jones, D. T. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq427 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
A Detailed View of a Ribosomal Active Site
Wimberly, B. T., Guymon, R., McCutcheon, J. P., White, S. W., & Ramakrishnan, V. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80759-x · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Agrawal, R. K., Penczek, P. A., Grassucci, R. A., & Frank, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.11.6134 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
The A-Z of bacterial translation inhibitors
Wilson, D. N. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409230903307311 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Self-citationHarms, J., Wilson, D., Schluenzen, F., Connell, S., Stachelhaus, T., Zaborowska, Z., Spahn, C., & Fucini, P. (2008) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Self-citationStructural Insight into Nascent Polypeptide Chain–Mediated Translational Stalling
Seidelt, B., Innis, C. A., Wilson, D. N., Gartmann, M., Armache, J., Villa, E., Trabuco, L. G., Becker, T. A., Mielke, T., Schulten, K. J., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177662 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Self-citationStructural basis of highly conserved ribosome recycling in eukaryotes and archaea
Becker, T. A., Franckenberg, S., Wickles, S., Shoemaker, C. J., Anger, A. M., Armache, J., Sieber, H., Ungewickell, C., Berninghausen, O., Daberkow, I., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10829 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationSchröder, G. F., Brünger, A. T., & Levitt, M. (2007) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2007.09.021 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Functional, biophysical, and structural bases for antibacterial activity of tigecycline
Olson, M. W., Ruzin, A., Feyfant, E., Rush, T. S., O'Connell, J., & Bradford, P. A. (2006) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01499-05 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Structure of the C-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein from Escherichia coli at 1.7 Å
Leijonmarck, M., & Liljas, A. (1987) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(87)90183-5 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Taylor, D. J., Nilsson, J., Merrill, A. R., Andersen, G. R., Nissen, P., & Frank, J. (2007) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601677 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
GTPase activation of elongation factor EF‐Tu by the ribosome during decoding
Schuette, J.-C., Murphy, F. V., Kelley, A. C., Weir, J. R., Giesebrecht, J., Connell, S. R., Loerke, J., Mielke, T., Zhang, W., Penczek, P. A., et al. (2009) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.26 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Structural basis for mRNA and tRNA positioning on the ribosome
Berk, V., Zhang, W., Pai, R. D., & Cate, J. H. D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607541103 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Connell, S. R., Takemoto, C., Wilson, D. N., Wang, H., Murayama, K., Terada, T., Shirouzu, M., Rost, M., Schüler, M., Giesebrecht, J., et al. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.027 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationSIGNATURE: A single-particle selection system for molecular electron microscopy
Chen, J. Z., & Grigorieff, N. (2006) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2006.06.001 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Target- and resistance-based mechanistic studies with TP-434, a novel fluorocycline antibiotic
Grossman, T. H., Starosta, A. L., Fyfe, C., O'Brien, W., Rothstein, D. M., Mikolajka, A., Wilson, D. N., & Sutcliffe, J. A. (2012) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.06187-11 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationBergeron, J., Ammirati, M., Danley, D., James, L., Norcia, M., Retsema, J., Strick, C. A., Su, W. G., Sutcliffe, J., & Wondrack, L. (1996) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.40.9.2226 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
SecM-Stalled Ribosomes Adopt an Altered Geometry at the Peptidyl Transferase Center
Bhushan, S., Hoffmann, T., Seidelt, B., Frauenfeld, J., Mielke, T., Berninghausen, O., Wilson, D. N., & Beckmann, R. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000581 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationTetracycline resistance mediated by ribosomal protection
Taylor, D. E., & Chau, A. (1996) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.40.1.1 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Structural rearrangements of the ribosome at the tRNA proofreading step
Jenner, L. B., Demeshkina, N., Yusupova, G. Z., & Yusupov, M. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1880 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
New developments in tetracycline antibiotics: Glycylcyclines and tetracycline efflux pump inhibitors
Chopra, I. (2002) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/s1368-7646(02)00051-1 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Mechanism of Tet(O)‐mediated tetracycline resistance
Connell, S. R., Trieber, C. A., Dinos, G. P., Einfeldt, E., Taylor, D. E., & Nierhaus, K. H. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg093 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Tet(M)-promoted release of tetracycline from ribosomes is GTP dependent
Burdett, V (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.11.3246-3251.1996 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Role of Domains 4 and 5 in Elongation Factor G Functions on the Ribosome
Savelsbergh, A., Matassova, N. B., Rodnina, M. V., & Wintermeyer, W. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.3886 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Sharma, M. R., Dönhöfer, A., Barat, C., Marquez, V., Datta, P. P., Fucini, P., Wilson, D. N., & Agrawal, R. K. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.062299 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationSpahn, C. M. T., Blaha, G., Agrawal, R. K., Penczek, P., Grassucci, R. A., Trieber, C. A., Connell, S. R., Taylor, D. E., Nierhaus, K. H., & Frank, J. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00238-6 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
A new tRNA intermediate revealed on the ribosome during EF4-mediated back-translocation
Connell, S. R., Topf, M., Qin, Y., Wilson, D. N., Mielke, T., Fucini, P., Nierhaus, K. H., & Spahn, C. M. T. (2008) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1469 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationTrieber, C. A., Burkhardt, N., Nierhaus, K. H., & Taylor, D. E. (1998) · bchm · doi:10.1515/bchm.1998.379.7.847 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Atomic mutagenesis reveals A2660 of 23S ribosomal RNA as key to EF-G GTPase activation
Clementi, N., Chirkova, A., Puffer, B., Micura, R., & Polacek, N. (2010) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.341 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Differential Effects of Thiopeptide and Orthosomycin Antibiotics on Translational GTPases
Mikolajka, A., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Starosta, A. L., Marquez, V., Ivanova, M. S., Cooperman, B. S., & Wilson, D. N. (2011) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.03.010 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationConnell, S. R., Trieber, C. A., Stelzl, U., Einfeldt, E., Taylor, D. E., & Nierhaus, K. H. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03115.x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Binding Interaction between Tet(M) and the Ribosome: Requirements for Binding
Dantley, K. A., Dannelly, H. K., & Burdett, V. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.16.4089-4092.1998 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance
Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.vmbf-0016-2015 · Cited by 2,782 · see citing works
Ribosome-targeting antibiotics and mechanisms of bacterial resistance
Wilson, D. N. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3155 · Cited by 1,054 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanisms of antibiotic resistance
Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016) · Virulence Mechanisms of Bacterial Pathogens · doi:10.1128/9781555819286.ch17 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
The bacterial translation stress response.
Starosta, A. L., Lassak, J., Jung, K., & Wilson, D. N. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12083 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationJenner, L., Starosta, A. L., Terry, D. S., Mikolajka, A., Filonava, L., Yusupov, M., Blanchard, S. C., Wilson, D. N., & Yusupova, G. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1216691110 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanism of tetracycline resistance by ribosomal protection protein Tet(O)
Li, W., Atkinson, G. C., Thakor, N. S., Allas, Ü., Lu, C.-C., Chan, K.-Y., Tenson, T., Schulten, K., Wilson, K. S., Hauryliuk, V., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2470 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Negamycin interferes with decoding and translocation by simultaneous interaction with rRNA and tRNA
Polikanov, Y. S., Szal, T., Jiang, F., Gupta, P., Matsuda, R., Shiozuka, M., Steitz, T. A., Vázquez-Laslop, N., & Mankin, A. S. (2014) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.021 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Sarecycline interferes with tRNA accommodation and tethers mRNA to the 70S ribosome
Batool, Z., Lomakin, I. B., Polikanov, Y. S., & Bunick, C. G. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2008671117 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Olivier, N. B., Altman, R. B., Noeske, J., Basarab, G. S., Code, E., Ferguson, A. D., Gao, N., Huang, J., Juette, M. F., Livchak, S., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414401111 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Radovanovic, M., Kekic, D., Gajic, I., Kabic, J., Jovicevic, M., Kekic, N., Opavski, N., & Ranin, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2023.1054555 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dönhöfer, A., Franckenberg, S., Wickles, S., Berninghausen, O., Beckmann, R., & Wilson, D. N.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Gene Center and Department for Biochemistry and
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (DE)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 16900-16905
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3479509
- OpenAlex
- W1969543781
- Semantic Scholar
- 377a70ee9be419418aa8d6191fd3bbe4acfb1615
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- tetM, tetracycline resistance, 70S ribosome, drug release mechanism, C-terminal extension, decoding center, domain IV, cryo-EM structure, antibiotic resistance
- MeSH terms
- Bacterial Proteins, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Escherichia coli, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Molecular, Ribosomes, Enterococcus faecalis, Tetracycline, Mutagenesis, DNA Primers, Cryoelectron Microscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review