Cited by 217RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance

Open access
Dönhöfer, Alexandra, Franckenberg, Sibylle, Wickles, Stephan, Berninghausen, Otto, Beckmann, Roland, Wilson, Daniel N.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Ribosome protection proteins (RPPs) confer tetracycline resistance by binding to the ribosome and chasing the drug from its binding site. The current model for the mechanism of action of RPPs proposes that drug release is indirect and achieved via conformational changes within the drug-binding site induced upon binding of the RPP to the ribosome. Here we report a cryo-EM structure of the RPP TetM in complex with the 70S ribosome at 7.2-Å resolution. The structure reveals the contacts of TetM with the ribosome, including interaction between the conserved and functionally critical C-terminal extension of TetM and the decoding center of the small subunit. Moreover, we observe direct interaction between domain IV of TetM and the tetracycline binding site and identify residues critical for conferring tetracycline resistance. A model is presented whereby TetM directly dislodges tetracycline to confer resistance.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A 7.2-Å cryo-EM structure of the ribosome protection protein TetM bound to the 70S ribosome shows that TetM directly contacts the tetracycline binding site via domain IV loop III and the decoding center via its C-terminal extension. The authors propose that TetM directly dislodges tetracycline and leaves the ribosome in a conformation that prevents drug rebinding while promoting ternary complex binding.

Key findings

  • The TetM•GDPNP•70S complex was reconstructed at 7.2-Å resolution (EMD-2183; PDB 3J25) from 406,687 particles; sorting yielded 27% TetM-bound nonrotated 70S, 40% rotated 70S without TetM, and 33% nonrotated 70S without TetM.
  • TetM’s conserved C-terminal extension (CTE) was modeled as an 11-aa α-helix (residues 627–637) that interacts with H69 of 23S rRNA and h44 of 16S rRNA near A1492/A1493, stabilizing a flipped-out decoding-center conformation; deleting the CTE (stop at residue 623) reduced tetracycline resistance to MIC50 ∼0.4 μg/mL, similar to no-TetM BL21 (∼0.6 μg/mL), whereas WT TetM raised MIC50 ∼14-fold to ∼10 μg/mL.
  • Domain IV loop III directly contacts C1054 in the primary tetracycline binding site; no density for tigecycline (Tgc) was observed in the TetM•70S map despite complex formation with 10 μM Tgc, and the Tgc C9-glycyl side chain was proposed to sterically hinder loop III, helping explain how Tgc overcomes TetM-mediated resistance.
  • Alanine scanning showed single loop III substitutions had no significant effect, but double Y506A-Y507A and triple Y507A-S508A-P509A TetM variants were inactive, while S508A-P509A-V510A retained activity.

Methods

  • E. coli 70S ribosomes (0.4 μM) were mixed with Tgc (10 μM), incubated at 37 °C for 20 min with purified recombinant E. faecalis TetM (4 μM) and GDPNP (500 μM); cryo-EM data were collected on a Titan Krios and processed with SPIDER, yielding a 7.2-Å map at FSC 0.5.
  • A homology model of E. faecalis TetM was built on the EF-G template using HHpred and Modeler, then fitted as rigid bodies to cryo-EM density with Coot and Chimera alongside ribosome crystal structures.
  • Site-specific tetM mutations were introduced with QuikChange, and minimal inhibitory concentrations were determined; growth of E. coli BL21 with or without TetM variants was compared across tetracycline concentrations (0–128 μg/mL).

Limitations

  • The paper states that at 7.2-Å resolution interactions can only be approximated, with closest residues listed at sites of density fusion; no crystal structure of any RPP was available, so TetM was homology-modeled on EF-G, and the CTE could not be generated by homology modeling.
  • The paper notes that the previous TetO map was not deposited, preventing direct comparison, and that no structure was reported for Tgc•70S, so the Tgc binding position was modeled into the primary tetracycline site based on chemical similarity.
  • Evident from the text: loop III is less well-resolved than loops I and II, and filtering the TetM•70S map to the TetO•70S resolution loses loop III density; single loop III alanine substitutions did not significantly affect resistance, with inactivity seen only for double/triple mutants.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1208037109

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance

    Domain IV of TetM directly interacts with the tetracycline binding site.

    “Moreover, we observe direct interaction between domain IV of TetM and the tetracycline binding site and identify residues critical for conferring tetracycline resistance.”
    • Also stated in: § Domain IV of TetM Directly Encroaches Upon the Tetracycline Binding · plain
      “Domain IV of TetM Directly Encroaches Upon the Tetracycline Binding”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Domain IV of TetM interacts with the cleft between the head and body of the small subunit.

    “Domain IV of TetM interacts with the cleft between the head and body of the small subunit (Fig. 3A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Density connects the distal end of helix-αA of the TetM C-terminal extension with helix 44 of the 16S rRNA, in close proximity to A1492 and A1493.

    “Additionally, density is seen connecting the distal end of helix-αA of the TetM-CTE with helix 44 of the 16S rRNA, in close proximity to A1492 and A1493 (Fig. 2E).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Loop II of TetM interacts with the proximal end of h34 of the 16S rRNA, with residues Ser465-Leu466-Gly467 coming into close proximity with the backbone of C1209 and the nucleobase of C1214.

    “Loop II between β4 4 and αA 4 interacts with the proximal end of h34 of the 16S rRNA, with residues Ser465-Leu466-Gly467 ( 465 SLG 467 ) coming into close proximity with the backbone of C1209 and the nucleobase of C1214 (Fig. 3C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Additional density in the TetM•70S map fuses directly with C1054 of the 16S rRNA, a component of the primary tetracycline binding site.

    “This additional density in the TetM•70S map fuses directly with C1054 of the 16S rRNA, a component of the primary tetracycline binding site (2, 3), and is consistent with the protection of C1054 from DMS modification observed upon TetO binding to the ribosome (15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    EF-G is shifted in position relative to TetM, being located closer to the 30S subunit and further away from the stalk base of the 50S subunit.

    “whereas the overall orientation of TetM on the ribosome is similar to that of EF-G (22), EF-G is shifted in position relative to TetM, being located closer to the 30S subunit and further away from the stalk base of the 50S subunit (Fig. 1D and SI Appendix, Fig. S6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The C-terminal extension of TetM interacts with a loop region at the tip of domain IV of TetM and with H69 of the 23S rRNA.

    “The CTE interacts with a loop region at the tip of domain IV of TetM, but also with H69 of the 23S rRNA (Fig. 2D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The proline-rich loop I of TetM is bent significantly to allow interaction with the RPP-specific C-terminal helix-αA CTE, whereas loop I of EF-G is longer and adopts an extended conformation on the ribosome that establishes interaction with the P-tRNA.

    “The proline-rich loop I, located between β2 4 and β3 4 , is bent significantly to allow interaction with the RPP-specific C-terminal helix-αA CTE (SI Appendix, Fig. S8A), whereas, in contrast, loop I of EF-G is longer and adopts an extended conformation on the ribosome that establishes interaction with the P-tRNA (22) (SI Appendix, Fig. S8B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Loop III of TetM is less well-resolved than loops I and II, but additional electron density is clearly observable within the TetM•70S map and is absent in other cryo-EM maps lacking A-site ligands.

    “Loop III of TetM linking β5 4 to helix αB 4 is less well-resolved than loops I and II, yet additional electron density is clearly observable within the TetM•70S map (Fig. 3C), which, in contrast, is absent in other cryo-EM maps lacking A-site ligands, such as the SecM-stalled ribosome nascent chain complex (26) (Fig. 3D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The binding position of TetM does not overlap with the mRNA and does not appear to encroach on the P-site.

    “However, the binding position of TetM does not overlap in position with the mRNA, and, unlike EF-G, TetM does not appear to encroach on the P-site (SI Ap- pendix, Fig. S5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance

    The TetM-70S structure reveals contacts of TetM with the ribosome, including interaction between the conserved C-terminal extension of TetM and the decoding center of the small subunit.

    “The structure reveals the contacts of TetM with the ribosome, including interaction between the conserved and functionally critical C-terminal extension of TetM and the decoding center of the small subunit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Deletion of the C-terminal extension of TetM extensively inhibited resistance activity, decreasing the MIC50 value to approximately 0.4 μg/mL, similar to that observed in the absence of TetM overexpression.

    “whereas, in contrast, deletion of the CTE of TetM extensively inhibited resistance activity, decreasing the MIC 50 value (∼0.4 μg/mL; Fig. 4B, blue triangles) to that observed in the absence of TetM overexpression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Double and triple mutations within loop III of TetM identified the Y506A-Y507A (YY/AA) and Y507A-S508A-P509A (YSP/AAA) TetM variants as inactive, whereas the S508A-P509A-V510A (SPV/AAA) triple mutant retained activity.

    “Subsequent analysis of double and triple mutations within loop III of TetM led to the identification of the Y506A-Y507A (YY/AA) and Y507A-S508A-P509A (YSP/AAA) TetM variants as inactive, whereas the S508A-P509A-V510A (SPV/ AAA) triple mutant retained activity (Fig. 4B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Binding of TetM (and TetO) to the ribosome leads to flipping out of A1492 and A1493, a conformation stabilized via interaction with the C-terminal extension of TetM.

    “Collectively, these results suggest that binding of both TetM (and TetO) to the ribosome leads to the flipping out of A1492 and A1493-a conformation that is stabilized via interaction with the CTE of TetM.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    TetM can bind to the tigecycline•70S complex and recycle tigecycline, but does so too inefficiently compared with tetracycline to allow translation levels necessary for viability.

    “As we observe the presence of a small population of 70S ribosome containing TetM (27%; SI Appendix, Fig. S2A), we conclude that TetM can bind to the Tgc•70S complex and recycle Tgc; however, it does so too inefficiently (compared with tetracycline) as to allow translation levels necessary for viability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Tigecycline binds the primary tetracycline binding site in a manner similar to tetracycline, as inferred from the similarity of their chemical structures.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The flipped-out conformation of A1492 and A1493 persists upon dissociation of TetM from the ribosome, which promotes binding of the ternary complex.

    “Footprinting experiments suggest that the flipped-out conformation of A1492 and A1493 persists upon dissociation of TetM from the ribosome (16), which promote binding of the ternary complex.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance

    Tetracyclines bind to elongating ribosomes and inhibit delivery of the ternary complex EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA to the A-site.

    “Tetracyclines are broad-spectrum antibiotic agents that bind to elongating ribosomes and inhibit delivery of the ternary complex EF-Tu, GTP and aminoacylated-tRNA (EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA) to the A-site (1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance

    The conformational changes were proposed to persist after TetO has dissociated from the ribosome, preventing rebinding of tetracycline as well as stimulating delivery of the ternary complex.

    “Moreover, the conformational changes were proposed to persist after TetO has dissociated from the ribosome, preventing rebinding of tetracycline as well as stimulating delivery of the ternary complex (9,16).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The altered conformation of C1054 perturbs the stacking interaction with tetracycline, leading to its dissociation from the ribosome and preventing rebinding.

    “(ii) The altered conformation of C1054 perturbs stacking interaction with tetracycline, leading to its dissociation from the ribosome and prevents rebinding (Fig. 5B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Tetracycline, which lacks the C9-glycyl side chain, exhibits significantly less overlap with the TetM density and would still permit interaction between the side chains within loop III and C1054 in h34 of the 16S rRNA.

    “Compared with Tgc, tetracycline that lacks the C9-glycyl side chain (SI Appendix, Fig. S10 G and H) exhibits significantly less overlap with the TetM density and would still permit interaction between the side chains within loop III and C1054 in h34 of the 16S rRNA (Fig. 4A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance

    Third-generation tetracycline derivatives such as tigecycline display enhanced antimicrobial activity, overcoming efflux and ribosome protection mechanisms.

    “The third generation of tetracycline derivatives, such as tigecycline (Tgc), display enhanced antimicrobial activity, overcoming efflux and ribosome protection mechanisms (6)(7)(8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The attached C9-glycyl side chain of tigecycline would prevent access of the residues of loop III of TetM, and this steric hindrance contributes, together with the increased affinity of tigecycline, to explaining how tigecycline overcomes TetM-mediated resistance whereas tetracycline cannot.

    “In contrast, the attached C9-glycyl side chain of Tgc would prevent access of the residues of loop III of TetM (Fig. 3 E and F), leading us to suggest that this steric hindrance contributes, together with the increased affinity of Tgc (7,8,27), to explaining how Tgc overcomes TetM-mediated resistance whereas tetracycline cannot (8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Tigecycline binds the primary tetracycline binding site in a manner similar to tetracycline, as inferred from the similarity of their chemical structures.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The conformation of C1054 and U1196 in the TetM•70S structure appears to be most compatible with binding of EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA and would disfavor rebinding of tetracycline.

    “Indeed, our findings provide structural support for this model, as the conformation of C1054 and U1196 in the TetM•70S structure appears to be most compatible with binding of EF-Tu•GTP•aa-tRNA (Fig. 4D) and would disfavor rebinding of tetracycline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    At 7.2-Å resolution, the interactions between TetM and the ribosome can only be approximated, and the closest residues at the site of density fusion are listed.

    “At 7.2-Å resolution, the interactions can only be approximated, and thus the closest residues between TetM and the ribosome at the site of density fusion are listed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance

    Binding of TetO to the ribosome leads to protection of C1214 and to a lesser extent C1054 within h34 from chemical modification, whereas the reactivity of A1408 in h44 is enhanced.

    “Binding of TetO to the ribosome leads to protection of C1214 and to a lesser extent C1054 within h34 from chemical modification, whereas the reactivity of A1408 in h44 is enhanced (15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

20 of 20
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Tigecycline binds the primary tetracycline binding site in a manner similar to tetracycline, as inferred from the similarity of their chemical structures.

    “Because there is no structure reported for Tgc•70S, the observed binding position of Tgc was modeled into the primary tetracycline binding site (2, 3) based on similarity of the chemical structures of the two drugs (SI Appendix, Fig. S10 D-H).”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TetM directly dislodges and releases tetracycline from the ribosome by interaction between domain IV of the 16S rRNA and the tetracycline binding site, and this interaction alters ribosomal conformation, preventing rebinding of the antibiotic.

    “Dönhöfer et al. recently showed that TetM directly dislodges and releases tetracycline from the ribosome by an interaction between the domain IV of the 16S rRNA and the tetracycline binding site. Furthermore, this interaction alters the ribosomal conformation, preventing rebinding of the antibiotic (52).”

    From Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance (2016) · cites this paper as [52]

  • The results agree with the results by Wilson and coworkers in all essential details, as expected based on the high sequence homology between Tet(O) and Tet(M).

    “Our results agree with the results by Wilson and coworkers in all essential details, as expected based on the high sequence homology between Tet(O) and Tet(M).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • TetM-ΔCTE has conflicting colors in the text and figure caption

    Minor

    The results describe the TetM-ΔCTE data as blue triangles, while the Fig. 4B caption identifies TetM-ΔCTE as pink and assigns blue to TetM-YY/AA.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dönhöfer, A., Franckenberg, S., Wickles, S., Berninghausen, O., Beckmann, R., & Wilson, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Gene Center and Department for Biochemistry and
  • Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-10
Volume
109
Issue
42
Pages
16900-16905
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1969543781
Cited by
217
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
tetM, tetracycline resistance, 70S ribosome, drug release mechanism, C-terminal extension, decoding center, domain IV, cryo-EM structure, antibiotic resistance
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Escherichia coli, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Molecular, Ribosomes, Enterococcus faecalis, Tetracycline, Mutagenesis, DNA Primers, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review