The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
eBird: Engaging Birders in Science and Conservation
Open accessAbstract
How do you successfully engage an audience in a citizen-science project? The processes developed by eBird (www.ebird.org), a fast-growing web-based tool that now gathers millions of bird observations per month, offers a model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences
Sullivan, B. L., Wood, C. L., Iliff, M. J., Bonney, R. E., Fink, D., & Kelling, S. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.006 · Cited by 2,017
Self-citationPredicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game
Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Treuille, A., Barbero, J., Lee, J., Beenen, M., Leaver-Fay, A., Baker, D., Popović, Z., & players, F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09304 · Cited by 1,368
Cited by
The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science
Sullivan, B. L., Aycrigg, J. L., Barry, J. H., Bonney, R. E., Bruns, N., Cooper, C. B., Damoulas, T., Dhondt, A. A., Dietterich, T., Farnsworth, A., et al. (2014) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003 · Cited by 1,155
Self-citationBias and information in biological records
Isaac, N. J. B., & Pocock, M. J. O. (2015) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/bij.12532 · Cited by 368
Allf, B. C., Cooper, C. B., Larson, L. R., Dunn, R. R., Futch, S. E., Sharova, M., & CAVALIER, D. (2022) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biac035 · Cited by 74
Free as in puppies: compensating for ict constraints in citizen science
Wiggins, A. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441942 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, C., Sullivan, B., Iliff, M., Fink, D., & Kelling, S.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-12-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1001220
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2098485216
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
