The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Wetlands are among the most productive and economically valuable ecosystems in the world. However, because of human activities, over half of the wetland ecosystems existing in North America, Europe, Australia, and China in the early 20th century have been lost. Ecological restoration to recover critical ecosystem services has been widely attempted, but the degree of actual recovery of ecosystem functioning and structure from these efforts remains uncertain. Our results from a meta-analysis of 621 wetland sites from throughout the world show that even a century after restoration efforts, biological structure (driven mostly by plant assemblages), and biogeochemical functioning (driven primarily by the storage of carbon in wetland soils), remained on average 26% and 23% lower, respectively, than in reference sites. Either recovery has been very slow, or postdisturbance systems have moved towards alternative states that differ from reference conditions. We also found significant effects of environmental settings on the rate and degree of recovery. Large wetland areas (>100 ha) and wetlands restored in warm (temperate and tropical) climates recovered more rapidly than smaller wetlands and wetlands restored in cold climates. Also, wetlands experiencing more (riverine and tidal) hydrologic exchange recovered more rapidly than depressional wetlands. Restoration performance is limited: current restoration practice fails to recover original levels of wetland ecosystem functions, even after many decades. If restoration as currently practiced is used to justify further degradation, global loss of wetland ecosystem function and structure will spread.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007) · doi:10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 · Cited by 13,640
World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · Cited by 11,456
Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration
Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E., & Harris, J. A. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012 · Cited by 2,008
Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems
Cardinale, B. J., Srivastava, D. S., Emmett Duffy, J., Wright, J. P., Downing, A. L., Sankaran, M., & Jouseau, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05202 · Cited by 1,871
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
Cited by
Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas
Elmqvist, T., Setälä, H., Handel, S., van der Ploeg, S., Aronson, J., Blignaut, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Nowak, D., Kronenberg, J., & de Groot, R. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001 · Cited by 895
Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice
Bull, J. W., Suttle, K. B., Gordon, A., Singh, N. J., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2013) · Oryx · doi:10.1017/s003060531200172x · Cited by 482
A critique of the ‘novel ecosystem’ concept
Murcia, C., Aronson, J., Kattan, G. H., Moreno-Mateos, D., Dixon, K., & Simberloff, D. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.006 · Cited by 310
Self-citationMeli, P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Balvanera, P., & Martínez Ramos, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093507 · Cited by 289
Enhancing protection for vulnerable waters
Creed, I. F., Lane, C. R., Serran, J. N., Alexander, L. C., Basu, N. B., Calhoun, A. J. K., Christensen, J. R., Cohen, M. J., Craft, C., D'Amico, E., et al. (2017) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo3041 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Moreno-Mateos, D., Power, M. E., Comín, F. A., & Yockteng, R.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-01-24
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1001247
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2041396888
- Cited by
- 952
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 45.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247
- The paper
- Moreno-Mateos, D., Power, M. E., Comín, F. A., & Yockteng, R. (2012). Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.