The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clade Age and Species Richness Are Decoupled Across the Eukaryotic Tree of Life
Open accessAbstract
Explaining the dramatic variation in species richness across the tree of life remains a key challenge in evolutionary biology. At the largest phylogenetic scales, the extreme heterogeneity in species richness observed among different groups of organisms is almost certainly a function of many complex and interdependent factors. However, the most fundamental expectation in macroevolutionary studies is simply that species richness in extant clades should be correlated with clade age: all things being equal, older clades will have had more time for diversity to accumulate than younger clades. Here, we test the relationship between stem clade age and species richness across 1,397 major clades of multicellular eukaryotes that collectively account for more than 1.2 million described species. We find no evidence that clade age predicts species richness at this scale. We demonstrate that this decoupling of age and richness is unlikely to result from variation in net diversification rates among clades. At the largest phylogenetic scales, contemporary patterns of species richness are inconsistent with unbounded diversity increase through time. These results imply that a fundamentally different interpretative paradigm may be needed in the study of phylogenetic diversity patterns in many groups of organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Sepkoski, J. J. (1984) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300008186 · Cited by 773
Diversity versus disparity and the radiation of modern cetaceans
Slater, G. J., Price, S. A., Santini, F., & Alfaro, M. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0408 · Cited by 312
Self-citationConstant extinction, constrained diversification, and uncoordinated stasis in North American mammals
Alroy, J. (1996) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/s0031-0182(96)00100-9 · Cited by 276
Cited by
How many species of mammals are there?
Burgin, C. J., Colella, J. P., Kahn, P. L., & Upham, N. S. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyx147 · Cited by 1,168
Rabosky, D. L., Santini, F., Eastman, J., Smith, S. A., Sidlauskas, B., Chang, J., & Alfaro, M. E. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2958 · Cited by 685
Self-citationEstimating the normal background rate of species extinction
De Vos, J. M., Joppa, L. N., Gittleman, J. L., Stephens, P. R., & Pimm, S. L. (2015) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12380 · Cited by 675
Phylogenomics reveals three sources of adaptive variation during a rapid radiation
Pease, J. B., Haak, D. C., Hahn, M. W., & Moyle, L. C. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002379 · Cited by 432
Tank, D. C., Eastman, J. M., Pennell, M. W., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Hinchliff, C. E., Brown, J. W., Sessa, E. B., & Harmon, L. J. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13491 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Rabosky, D. L., Slater, G. J., & Alfaro, M. E.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-08-28
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e1001381
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2027739924
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.